Applicability and performance of some similarity metrics for automated image registration

被引:0
|
作者
Suri, Sahil [1 ]
Arora, Manoj K. [1 ]
Seiler, Ralf [1 ]
Csaplovics, Elmar [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Roorkee 247667, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
image registration; mutual information; cluster reward algorithm; genetic algorithm; simplex algorithm;
D O I
10.1117/12.693954
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Image registration is a key to many image processing tasks such as image fusion, image change detection, GIS overlay operations, 3D visualization etc. The task of image registration needs to become efficient and automatic to process enormous amount of remote sensing data. A number of feature and intensity based image registration techniques are in vogue. The aim of this study is to evaluate the applicability and performance of the two intensity based similarity metrics, namely mutual information and cluster reward algorithm. Image registration task has been mapped as an optimization problem. A combination of a global optimizer namely Genetic algorithm and a local optimizer namely Nelder Mead Simplex algorithm have been successfully used to search registration parameters from the coarsest to the finest level of the image pyramid formed using wavelet transformation. For sound investigations, registration of remote sensing images acquired with varied spatial, spectral characteristics from the ASTER sensor have been considered. The image registration experiments suggest that both the similarity metrics have the capability of successfully registering the images with high accuracy and efficiency. In general, mutual information has yielded more accurate results than cluster reward algorithm.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Image registration by integrating similarity and epipolor constraints
    He, Mingyi
    Dai, Yuchao
    Mang, Jing
    ICIEA 2008: 3RD IEEE CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 1870 - 1874
  • [32] A Combined Similarity Measure for Multimodal Image Registration
    Zhou, Jingkai
    Liu, Qiong
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGING SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES (IST) PROCEEDINGS, 2015, : 274 - 278
  • [33] Normalized similarity measures for medical image registration
    Bardera, A
    Feixas, M
    Boada, I
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2004: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2004, 5370 : 108 - 118
  • [34] The comparison of the similarity metric in medical image registration
    Yang, CL
    Zheng, L
    ISTM/2005: 6TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TEST AND MEASUREMENT, VOLS 1-9, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 6343 - 6346
  • [35] A structural similarity-inspired performance assessment model for multisensor image registration algorithms
    Jiao, Jichao
    Li, Wenyi
    Deng, Zhongliang
    Arain, Qasim Ali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 2017, 14 (04): : 1 - 11
  • [36] Applicability of the SIFT operator to geometric SAR image registration
    Schwind, P.
    Suri, S.
    Reinartz, P.
    Siebert, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 31 (08) : 1959 - 1980
  • [37] Robust voxel similarity metrics for the registration of dissimilar single and multimodal images
    Nikou, C
    Heitz, F
    Armspach, JP
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1999, 32 (08) : 1351 - 1368
  • [38] Using String Similarity Metrics for Automated Grading of SQL Statements
    Stajduhar, I.
    Mausa, G.
    2015 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, ELECTRONICS AND MICROELECTRONICS (MIPRO), 2015, : 1250 - 1255
  • [39] Comparison of similarity metrics for texture image retrieval.
    Kokare, M
    Chatterji, BN
    Biswas, PK
    IEEE TENCON 2003: CONFERENCE ON CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION, VOLS 1-4, 2003, : 571 - 575
  • [40] Comparison of Similarity Measurement Metrics on Medical Image Data
    Samantaray, Aswini. K.
    Rahulkar, Amol D.
    2019 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION AND NETWORKING TECHNOLOGIES (ICCCNT), 2019,