Checking Correctness and Compliance of Integrated Process Models

被引:8
|
作者
Woerzberger, Rene [1 ]
Kurpick, Thomas [1 ]
Heer, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aachen, Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Dept Comp Sci Software Engn 3, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SYMBOLIC AND NUMERIC ALGORITHMS FOR SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING | 2009年
关键词
D O I
10.1109/SYNASC.2008.10
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Models of different kinds are used in the area of business process management. Abstract process knowledge as well as executable process definitions call be visualized and edited in a graphical manner The same holds true for models of process instances in some process-aware information systems (PAIS), which allow for dynamic modifications in a process instance during process runtime. An appropriate modeling tool must not only provide means to graphically edit different kinds of models oil different abstraction layers but also detect or prevent violations of certain model constraints. These constraints comprise a model's internal correctness as well as a model's compliance with general process knowledge expressed in another more abstract model. In this paper we contribute an approach that allows for uniformly specifying correctness as well as compliance checks for diverse graphical process models. This is achieved by means of all integrated meta-model for models of different kinds. The integrated meta-model is referenced by a fixed set of Object Constraint Language (OCL) expressions, which specify, correctness and compliance checks. We exemplify, some OCL expressions and their application within a prototypical modeling tool.
引用
收藏
页码:576 / 583
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Checking security compliance between models and code
    Tuma, Katja
    Peldszus, Sven
    Struber, Daniel
    Scandariato, Riccardo
    Juerjens, Jan
    SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS MODELING, 2023, 22 (01): : 273 - 296
  • [22] Checking security compliance between models and code
    Katja Tuma
    Sven Peldszus
    Daniel Strüber
    Riccardo Scandariato
    Jan Jürjens
    Software and Systems Modeling, 2023, 22 : 273 - 296
  • [23] An Efficient Business Process Compliance Checking Approach
    Becker, Joerg
    Bergener, Philipp
    Breuker, Dominic
    Delfmann, Patrick
    Eggert, Mathias
    GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABILITY IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS: MANAGING THE TRANSFER AND DIFFUSION OF IT, 2011, 366 : 282 - 287
  • [24] Evolution of Compliance Checking in Process Mining Discipline
    Elhagaly, Moustafa
    Drvoderic, Karlo
    Kippers, Richard G.
    Bukhsh, Faiza Allah
    2019 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, MATHEMATICS AND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES (ICOMET), 2019,
  • [25] Compliance checking for semantically annotated process model
    Gong, Ping
    International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, 2012, 6 (21) : 670 - 679
  • [26] Process Compliance checking using Model Checker
    Sebastian, Ritz
    Asokan, Shimmi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INVENTIVE COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES (ICICCT), 2017, : 363 - 368
  • [27] MPI correctness checking with Marmot
    Krammer, Bettina
    Hilbrich, Tobias
    Himmler, Valentin
    Czink, Blasius
    Dichev, Kiril
    Mueller, Matthias S.
    TOOLS FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING, 2008, : 61 - +
  • [28] Structuredness and its significance for correctness of process models
    Ralf Laue
    Jan Mendling
    Information Systems and e-Business Management, 2010, 8 : 287 - 307
  • [29] On the suitability of correctness criteria for business process models
    Dehnert, J
    Zimmermann, A
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3649 : 386 - 391
  • [30] Checking correctness of transactional behaviors
    Ciancia, Vincenzo
    Ferrari, Gian Luigi
    Guanciale, Roberto
    Strollo, Daniele
    FORMAL TECHNIQUES FOR NETWORKED AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS - FORTE 2008, 2008, 5048 : 134 - +