Agricultural sustainability assessment using multicriteria indicators and hierarchical tools-a review

被引:3
|
作者
Neto, Joana [1 ]
Cunha, Mario [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Fac Sci, Dept Geosci Environm & Terr Planning, Rua Campo Alegre, P-4169007 Porto, Portugal
关键词
indicators; hierarchical models; computational tools; environmental criteria; sustainability assessment; environmental performance; agricultural practices; agricultural management; sustainability theoretical frameworks; AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS; IMPACT; METHODOLOGY; LANDSCAPE; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEMS; LCA;
D O I
10.1504/IJSAMI.2020.112849
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Europe's 2020 strategy considers sustainable management as an increasingly important criterion for the several normative and incentives recently legislated. It is expectable that in short-term, political decision-makers and farmers will need to evaluate the type and degree of their activities' impact on the environment, economy and society. For this reason, tools are required to ease and translate these evaluations, capable of defining the main imbalance factors that need action. Despite a wide range of sustainability assessment tools available in the literature, the underlying methodologies are very similar and resort to indicators aggregated in hierarchical evaluation models that should be representative and adaptive for putative transferability. This paper provides an overview of the most relevant computational sustainability evaluation tools and their scope of application, in a benchmarking analysis. To ease the comprehension of these tools, a literature review was performed to analyse their structural elements and based on methodologies.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 400
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Understanding the social dimension of sustainability in agriculture: a critical review of sustainability assessment tools
    Judith Janker
    Stefan Mann
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2020, 22 : 1671 - 1691
  • [32] Participatory tuning agricultural sustainability assessment tools to Flemish farmer and sector needs
    Coteur, Ine
    Marchand, Fleur
    Debruyne, Lies
    Dalemans, Floris
    Lauwers, Ludwig
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2018, 69 : 70 - 81
  • [33] Integrated assessment of sustainability of agricultural systems and land use: Methods, tools and applications
    Bezlepkina, Irina
    Reidsma, Pytrik
    Sieber, Stefan
    Helming, Katharina
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2011, 104 (02) : 105 - 109
  • [34] Social sustainability tools and indicators for the food supply chain: A systematic literature review
    Desiderio, E.
    Garcia-Herrero, L.
    Hall, D.
    Segre, A.
    Vittuari, M.
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 30 : 527 - 540
  • [35] Navigating next-gen nutrition care using artificial intelligence-assisted dietary assessment tools-a scoping review of potential applications
    Phalle, Anuja
    Gokhale, Devaki
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2025, 12
  • [36] Performance assessment and indicators for agricultural water management-A review
    Ahmad, Muhammad Tajuri
    Haie, Naim
    Goncalves, Jose Manuel
    Pinho, Jose
    Yen, Haw
    Yakubu, Mahadi Lawan
    Mohammed, Murtala Uba
    Suleimana, Aiuba
    WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2024, 38 (02) : 192 - 211
  • [37] Prioritizing Sustainability Indicators: Using Materiality Analysis to Guide Sustainability Assessment and Strategy
    Whitehead, Jay
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 26 (03) : 399 - 412
  • [38] Critical Review of the Material Criteria of Building Sustainability Assessment Tools
    Park, Jiyoung
    Yoon, Jungwon
    Kim, Kwang-Hyun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (02)
  • [39] A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools
    Sharifi, Ayyoob
    Murayama, Akito
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2013, 38 : 73 - 87
  • [40] Environmental sustainability assessment in agricultural systems: A conceptual and methodological review
    Soule, Emma
    Michonneau, Philippe
    Michel, Nadia
    Bockstaller, Christian
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 325 (325)