Audit Service Quality Perceived by Customers: Formative Modelling Measurement Approach

被引:3
|
作者
Pestovic, Kristina [1 ]
Milicevic, Nikola [1 ]
Djokic, Nenad [1 ]
Djokic, Ines [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Novi Sad, Fac Econ Subotica, Subotica 24000, Serbia
关键词
audit quality; higher-order model; reflective-formative model; satisfaction; loyalty; MULTIPLE-ITEM SCALE; BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS; SATISFACTION; PERCEPTIONS; LOYALTY; INSIGHTS; IMPACT; FEES;
D O I
10.3390/su132111724
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The imperative to measure perceived service quality by a formative model in which it represents higher-order formative construct, consisting of reflective first-order constructs ((sub)dimensions), is defined in leading marketing literature in previous years. That approach is of special importance since model misspecifications were often occurring in perceived service quality measurement researches, which may lead to totally wrong conclusions. Furthermore, when it comes to the perceived audit service quality, according to the knowledge of the authors, this is the first implementation of the described approach. Besides the analysis of perceived quality dimensions (all of them originate from intensively used SERVQUAL instrument and are adopted to audit service quality: tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy), the model included relations between quality and client's satisfaction and loyalty. The results were obtained by processing 123 responses from Serbian companies. All dimensions of perceived quality influenced it positively and significantly (the strongest influence is related to assurance, followed by responsiveness; smaller coefficient with relatively similar value describes the influence of reliability; followed by empathy; the weakest is the impact of tangibles). Furthermore, research results pointed to the existence of positive relations between audit quality, satisfaction and loyalty. Hereby, satisfaction partially mediates the relationship between quality and loyalty.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Perceived quality versus quality of processes: a meta concept of service quality measurement
    Urban, Wieslaw
    SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL, 2013, 33 (02): : 200 - 217
  • [22] The impact of perceived service quality on customers' repurchase intention: Mediation effect of price perception
    Salem, Omar
    Kiss, Marietta
    INNOVATIVE MARKETING, 2022, 18 (04) : 1 - 12
  • [23] QUALITY AND SERVICE FOR INTERNAL CUSTOMERS
    MCDERMOTT, LC
    EMERSON, M
    TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 1991, 45 (01): : 61 - 64
  • [24] Perceived service quality in bus transit service: A structural equation approach
    de Ona, Juan
    de Ona, Rocio
    Eboli, Laura
    Mazzulla, Gabriella
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2013, 29 : 219 - 226
  • [25] Measurement of perceived service quality in the food retail industry of Turkey
    Ihtiyar, Ali
    Ahmad, Fauziah Sh
    ENERGY EDUCATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PART B-SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 2012, 4 (04): : 2601 - 2610
  • [26] Beyond Providing Information: An Analysis on the Perceived Service Quality, Satisfaction, and Loyalty of Public Library Customers
    Oh, Dong-Geun
    LIBRI-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIBRARIES AND INFORMATION STUDIES, 2020, 70 (04): : 345 - 359
  • [27] SERVICE QUALITY AS A DIMENSION OF AUDIT QUALITY
    Sever Malis, Sanja
    Brozovic, Mateja
    PROCEEDINGS OF FEB ZAGREB 10TH INTERNATIONAL ODYSSEY CONFERENCE ON ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2019, 1 (01): : 69 - 83
  • [28] Exploring Perceived Benefits of Service Robots on Customers' Experiences
    Lee, Seonjeong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY & TOURISM ADMINISTRATION, 2024,
  • [29] MODELLING PERCEIVED PEDESTRIAN LEVEL OF SERVICE OF SIDEWALKS: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION APPROACH
    Bivina, Geetha Rajendran
    Parida, Manoranjan
    TRANSPORT, 2019, 34 (03) : 339 - 350
  • [30] Why do customers use self-service information technologies in retail? The mediating effect of perceived service quality
    Kallweit, Katrin
    Spreer, Philipp
    Toporowski, Waldemar
    JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2014, 21 (03) : 268 - 276