Development of a baseline assessment tool to establish students' foundational knowledge of life sciences at entry to university

被引:2
|
作者
Pienaar, L. [1 ]
Prince, R. [2 ]
Abrahams, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Sci Educ, Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Univ Cape Town, Ctr Higher Educ Dev, Ctr Educ Testing Access & Placement, Cape Town, South Africa
[3] Univ Cape Town, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Human Biol, Cape Town, South Africa
来源
关键词
BLOOMS TAXONOMY; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; EDUCATION; COMPETENCE; PREDICTORS; PROGRAM; ANATOMY;
D O I
10.7196/AJHPE.2021.v13i1.1226
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Universities in South Africa use the Grade 12 school-leaving examinations to measure whether students have the knowledge and skills needed to enter tertiary-level education. However, there is much discussion on the effectiveness of these assessments to measure the preparedness of students for their first year at university. To facilitate the appropriate teaching and learning of anatomy and physiology, there is a need to assess students' baseline knowledge of life sciences at entry to their first year at university. Objectives. To develop and refine an anatomy and physiology foundational knowledge assessment (A&P foundational knowledge assessment), which looks back to the content of the Grade 12 life sciences curriculum and forward to the first-year anatomy and physiology curricula. Methods. Three hundred and seventy-one first-year students (occupational therapy, physiotherapy and MB ChB) wrote the A&P foundational knowledge assessment. Classic item and test analysis was done using Iteman 4.3 software (Assessment Systems Corp., USA). Results. The Kuder-Richardson formula 20 (KR-20) reliability score, which ranges from 0 to 1, was 0.64 for all the students. For MB ChB students, the KR-20 value was lower (0.57) compared with that for occupational therapy and physiotherapy students (0.66). The KR-20 scores for the 21 physiology and 16 anatomy items were 0.48 and 0.57, respectively. A KR-20 score of >0.50 is considered acceptable. The mean difficulty index (range 0 - 1) for physiology was 0.60, and the mean discrimination index was 0.15. For anatomy, the mean item difficulty index was 0.57 and mean discrimination index was 0.21. Conclusion. Based on the acceptable reliability value, the assessment was shown to be an effective instrument to measure students' foundational knowledge in human anatomy and physiology, which is part of life sciences.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 82
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of dietary intake in Spanish university students of health sciences
    Correa-Rodriguez, Maria
    Pocovi, Gabriela
    Schmidt-RioValle, Jacqueline
    Gonzalez-Jimenez, Emilio
    Rueda-Medina, Blanca
    ENDOCRINOLOGIA DIABETES Y NUTRICION, 2018, 65 (05): : 265 - 273
  • [22] AN ASSESSMENT OF THE ASSERTIVENESS AMONG STUDENTS OF JAHROM UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
    Yektatalab, S.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 24
  • [23] A Measurement Tool for Repeated Measurement of Assessment of University Students' Writing Skill: Development and Evaluation
    Sayin, Ayfer
    Kahraman, Nilufer
    JOURNAL OF MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION AND PSYCHOLOGY-EPOD, 2020, 11 (02): : 113 - 130
  • [24] Microfluidics An essential tool for product development in the life sciences
    Becker, Holger
    Gaertner, Claudia
    CHIMICA OGGI-CHEMISTRY TODAY, 2011, 29 (04) : 11 - 14
  • [25] The Development and Assessment of Competencies in Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences
    Petrova, Egita
    Jansone, Dace
    Silkane, Vineta
    2ND WORLD CONFERENCE ON PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIOLOGY (PSYSOC 2013), 2013, 140 : 241 - 245
  • [26] AN ASSESSMENT TOOL TO COMPARE THE ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
    Jose Vieira, Maria
    Vidal, Javier
    Barrio, Sara
    RIE-REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION EDUCATIVA, 2007, 25 (02): : 327 - 350
  • [27] EVALUATION OF STUDENTS' LEARNING SKILLS IN MATHEMATICS AT LATVIA UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES IN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT
    Zeidmane, Anda
    Rubina, Tatjana
    EDULEARN18: 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, : 2123 - 2130
  • [28] GET A LIFE! A FUTURE WORK LIFE SIMULATION TOOL FOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
    Ollila, J.
    Jokinen, L.
    Ilkkala, V.
    INTED2014: 8TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2014, : 1459 - 1465
  • [29] Unpacking the foundational dimensions of work integration social enterprise The development of an assessment tool
    Lysaght, Rosemary
    Roy, Michael J.
    Rendall, Jack S.
    Krupa, Terry
    Ball, Liam
    Davis, Janessa
    SOCIAL ENTERPRISE JOURNAL, 2018, 14 (01) : 60 - 70
  • [30] Multilevel Assessment of Middle School Students' Interest in the Health Sciences: Development and Validation of a New Measurement Tool
    Romine, William L.
    Miller, Michele E.
    Knese, Shawn A.
    Folk, William R.
    CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2016, 15 (02):