Does performance measurement improve public sector performance? A case of Australian government agencies

被引:6
|
作者
Smith, Graham [1 ]
Halligan, John [1 ]
Mir, Monir [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canberra, Inst Governance & Policy Anal, 11 Kirinari St, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia
[2] Univ Canberra, Canberra Business Sch, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
Australian government; government agencies; performance measurement; public sector performance; SERVICE; TARGETS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/1467-8500.12481
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The paper investigates whether performance measurement drives performance improvement in Australian government agencies. Because the answer to such a question is rarely unconditional, contextual factors such as jurisdiction and type of organisation are considered. The paper uses documents such as budgets and annual reports of nine government agencies in three Australian jurisdictions to analyse how results against targets influence subsequent measured performance. It finds that performance measurement does not drive performance improvement for the agencies studied. The paper also explores two types of mechanism by which performance measurement might improve performance in Australian government agencies. One mechanism is that setting targets focuses effort leading to improved performance. A second mechanism assumes that policy intent plus resources leads to good performance measures, which produces better information and decisions and hence higher performance. No discernible impacts of these mechanisms on performance improvements in these agencies were observed. A systems-based approach to understanding the forces acting on managers and organisations showed that the mechanisms described above were less effective than countervailing influences that tended to derogate from the use of performance measurement.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 731
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] New public management and the rise of public sector performance audit Evidence from the Australian case
    Parker, Lee D.
    Jacobs, Kerry
    Schmitz, Jana
    ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2019, 32 (01): : 280 - 306
  • [12] The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance
    Spekle, Roland F.
    Verbeeten, Frank H. M.
    MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (02) : 131 - 146
  • [13] Digital government: technology and public sector performance.
    Pollard, Hilary
    INFORMATION RESEARCH-AN INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC JOURNAL, 2007, 12 (04):
  • [14] Transforming the French public sector: Government performance and results
    Stoll, JF
    ESPRIT, 2002, (12) : 192 - 200
  • [16] Digital government: Technology and public sector performance.
    Krueger, Brian S.
    JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2007, 69 (01): : 276 - 278
  • [17] Public sector corruption and perceived government performance in transition
    Moldogaziev, Tima T.
    Liu, Cheol
    GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 2021, 34 (02): : 475 - 504
  • [18] Australian public sector performance management: success or stagnation?
    Hawke, Lewis
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 61 (03) : 310 - 328
  • [19] Does Evaluation Improve Performance? - A Case Study of Japanese Public Libraries
    Shimoyama, Kanako
    Nishiura, Minako
    Naka, Hajime
    Tsuji, Keita
    Itsumura, Hiroshi
    QUALITATIVE & QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN LIBRARIES, 2013, : 293 - 303
  • [20] Performance Measurement in Public Sector of Transition Countries
    Veledar, Benina
    Basic, Meliha
    Kapic, Jadranka
    BUSINESS SYSTEMS RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2014, 5 (02): : 72 - 83