NOVATION AND DELEGATION OF DEBT - WHAT IS THE EFFECT ON THE SECURED CHARACTER OF THE UNDERLYING DEBT?

被引:0
|
作者
Sonnekus, J. C. [1 ]
Schlemmer, E. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
[2] Univ Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Personal rights may be transferred by means of cession, and, in such an instance, the cedent (creditor) does not need the debtor's permission, but once the debtor has been informed, the debt is redeemed only if he performs against the cessionary. If however, someone owes a debt, he (the debtor) can free himself of the obligation only if he redeems the debt, if he is released, or through the running of prescription. But sometimes it might be necessary that a restructuring of someone's debts takes place or the debtor may want to be replaced with someone else who is willing to take over his obligation. This can be done only with the cooperation and agreement of the creditor. In such a case the debtor delegates his obligation to another person, who then becomes the new debtor of a new debt - the creditor relinquishes his right against the old debtor and accepts the new debtor and the new debt. The old debt no longer exists. It is also possible to rearrange the debt and create a new obligation which extinguishes the old debt - a novation takes place. This contribution starts with a discussion of these general principles and particularly the role that they (should) play when one is dealing with a secured debt which the debtor wants to delegate or when novation comes into play. This leads into a discussion of Wilke NO v Griekwaland Wes Korporatief Ltd (1327/2019) 2020 ZASCA 182 (23 Dec 2020) and the judgments in the earlier courts in which the supreme court of appeal and the other courts did not consider the implications of delegation and novation on an underlying debt when that debt was secured. Delegation and novation extinguish the underlying debt and any security right fortifying that debt is thereby also extinguished because of the principle of accessority. If the creditor requires the new debt to be secured, a new security right needs to be established by meeting all the requirements for the establishment of such security whether it is a right of suretyship or a real security right. A creditor must carefully consider agreeing to a delegation or novation of a secured debt since the implication is that he loses his secured and preferential position, and, even with the creation of a new security right, he loses the ranking he initially held in the line of secured creditors when a right of mortgage, for example, is at stake - qui prior est tempore potior est iure (D 20 4 11pr).
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 378
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The character of credit: Personal debt in English culture
    Anderson, O
    ENGLISH HISTORICAL REVIEW, 2004, 119 (483) : 1000 - 1002
  • [42] Evaluating the underlying behind variable rate debt
    Mccue, Michael J.
    Kim, Tae Hyun
    HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (04) : 300 - 308
  • [43] Public debt and corporate debt: Is there a crowding out effect in Brazil?
    Hoerlle, Carlos Stahlhoefer
    Kayo, Eduardo Kazuo
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2025, 74
  • [44] What motivates exchangeable debt offerings?
    Danielova, Anna N.
    Smart, Scott B.
    Boquist, John
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2010, 16 (02) : 159 - 169
  • [45] What Is Social Debt in Software Engineering?
    Tamburri, Damian A.
    Kruchten, Philippe
    Lago, Patricia
    Van Vliet, Hans
    2013 6TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON COOPERATIVE AND HUMAN ASPECTS OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (CHASE), 2013, : 93 - 96
  • [46] Pay Ourselves What to Ourselves Is Debt
    Gonzalez, Elisa
    YALE REVIEW, 2021, 109 (01): : 130 - 131
  • [47] The debt: What America owes to blacks
    McWhorter, J
    NEW REPUBLIC, 2001, 225 (04) : 32 - 38
  • [48] A FREE-CASH FLOW THEORY OF SECURED DEBT AND CREDITOR PRIORITIES
    TRIANTIS, GG
    VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1994, 80 (08) : 2155 - 2168
  • [49] What Prospects for a European Debt Agency?
    Diev, Pavel
    Daniel, Laurent
    REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2011, 62 (06): : 1147 - 1162
  • [50] What Explains Sovereign Debt Litigation?
    Schumacher, Julian
    Trebesch, Christoph
    Enderlein, Henrik
    JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2015, 58 (03): : 585 - 623