The interaction of global motion and global form processing on the perception of implied motion: An equivalent noise approach

被引:5
|
作者
Joshi, Mahesh R. [1 ]
Simmers, Anita J. [2 ]
Jeon, Seong T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Plymouth, Sch Hlth Profess, Eye & Vis Res Grp, Plymouth, Devon, England
[2] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Dept Life Sci, Vis Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Global motion; Global form; Implied motion; Noise; Equivalent noise paradigm; PSYCHOPHYSICAL EVIDENCE; SPATIAL INTEGRATION; BIOLOGICAL MOTION; OPPOSITE-POLARITY; GLASS PATTERNS; VISUAL-MOTION; DIRECTION; SIGNALS; MECHANISMS; COHERENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2021.04.006
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Global motion and global form are proposed to be processed through functionally differentiated independent channels along dorsal (motion) and ventral (form) pathways. However, more recent studies show significant interactions between these pathways by inducing the perception of motion (implied motion) from presenting the independent frames of static Glass patterns. The mechanisms behind such interaction are not adequately understood with studies showing a larger contribution of either a motion or form processing mechanism. In the current study, we adapted the equivalent noise paradigm to disentangle the effect of internal noise (local processing) and sampling efficiency (global processing) on global motion, global form, and the interaction of both on the perception of implied motion using physically equivalent stimuli. Six visually normal observers discriminated the direction or orientation of random dot kinematograms (RDK), static Glass patterns (Glass), and dynamic Glass patterns (dGlass) whose directions/orientations were determined by the means of normal distributions with a range of direction/orientation variances that served as external noise. Thresholds (tau) showed a consistent pattern across observers and external noise levels, where tau Glass > tau dGlass > tau RDK. Nested model comparisons where the thresholds were related to the external noise, internal noise, and the sampling efficiency revealed that the difference in performance between the tasks was best described by the change in sampling efficiency with invariable internal noise. Our results showed that the higher thresholds for implied motion compared to real motion could be due to inefficient pooling of local dipole orientation cues at global processing stages involving motion mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 40
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Correspondence noise limits to global motion perception
    Tripathy, S. P.
    Barlow, H. B.
    PERCEPTION, 1997, 26 : 7 - 7
  • [12] Global form and motion processing in healthy ageing
    Agnew, Hannah C.
    Phillips, Louise H.
    Pilz, Karin S.
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2016, 166 : 12 - 20
  • [13] Brain systems processing global form and motion
    Braddick, OJ
    Atkinson, J
    Wattam-Bell, J
    Aspell, J
    O'Brien, J
    PERCEPTION, 2004, 33 : 21 - 21
  • [14] GLOBAL MOTION PERCEPTION - INTERACTION OF THE ON AND OFF PATHWAYS
    EDWARDS, M
    BADCOCK, DR
    VISION RESEARCH, 1994, 34 (21) : 2849 - 2858
  • [15] The interaction of motion and orientation in the perception of global structure
    Or, CCF
    Khuu, SK
    Hayes, A
    PERCEPTION, 2005, 34 : 172 - 173
  • [16] The Influence of Sound on Visual Global Motion Directional Discrimination: An Equivalent Noise Approach
    Ku, Ang-Ke
    Huang, Pi-Chun
    I-PERCEPTION, 2017, 8 : 91 - 92
  • [17] Local form–motion interactions influence global form perception
    J. D. McCarthy
    D. Cordeiro
    G. P. Caplovitz
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2012, 74 : 816 - 823
  • [18] The influence of embedded form signals on the perception of global motion
    Ross, J.
    PERCEPTION, 2001, 30 : 69 - 69
  • [19] Vernier acuity is normal in migraine, whereas global form and global motion perception are not
    McKendrick, Allison M.
    Badcock, David R.
    Gurgone, Melissa
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2006, 47 (07) : 3213 - 3219
  • [20] Global motion and form processing in Williams syndrome children
    Braddick, O
    Atkinson, J
    WattamBell, J
    Anker, S
    PERCEPTION, 1997, 26 (06) : 762 - 762