Consumer preferences for electricity tariffs: Does proximity matter?

被引:48
|
作者
Kalkbrenner, Bernhard J. [1 ]
Yonezawa, Koichi [2 ]
Roosen, Jutta [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Management, Chair Mkt & Consumer Res, Munich, Germany
[2] Cornell Univ, Charles H Dyson Sch Appl Econ & Management, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
Discrete choice experiment; Distributed energy; Electricity labeling; Regional electricity supply; Renewable energy; Willingness to pay; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; INTEGRATING DISTRIBUTED GENERATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; MIXED LOGIT; WIND-ENERGY; CHOICE EXPERIMENT; SMART GRIDS; CHEAP TALK; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The introduction of renewable energy sources fosters the transformation to an energy system with distributed generation. This alters the relation between consumers and power generation sites, as generation and consumption spatially converge. It allows for new configurations within the energy sector and provides opportunities for marketing regional energy. We empirically investigate consumer preferences for electricity generation in proximity to end-users, focusing on the proximity of generation and providers, and present representative data for Germany. In a discrete choice experiment, a sample of 780 consumer households and 173 adopters of a renewable energy system (prosumers) chose from a range of different electricity tariffs. We estimate the willingness to pay for the following attributes: shares of regional generation, power providers, and electricity mixes. We find evidence in favor of regional production, but in spite of positive attitudes towards local generation from renewable sources, willingness to pay is not responsive to higher shares of regional generation. In addition, a preference for regional providers exists. The results show that renewable energy mixes are preferred, particularly a solar and hydro mix. Adopters state slightly more distinct preferences as compared to consumer households. Thus, we find there is potential for business models offering regionally generated electricity.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 424
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pressure mountains and electricity tariffs
    Pfeiffer
    ZEITSCHRIFT DES VEREINES DEUTSCHER INGENIEURE, 1930, 74 : 1022 - 1023
  • [32] ELECTRICITY TARIFFS IN SWEDEN - A REPLY
    ANDERSSON, R
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1986, 8 (01) : 54 - 56
  • [33] ELECTRICITY TARIFFS IN SWEDEN - A COMMENT
    HJALMARSSON, L
    VEIDERPASS, A
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1986, 8 (01) : 51 - 53
  • [34] Tariffs and trade fluctuations: Does protectionism matter as much as we think?
    Thompson, WR
    Reuveny, R
    INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 1998, 52 (02) : 421 - +
  • [35] Consumer preferences for local renewable electricity production in Japan: A choice experiment
    Irie, Noriko
    Kawahara, Naoko
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 182 : 1171 - 1181
  • [36] Consumer preferences for local renewable electricity production in Japan: A choice experiment
    Irie, Noriko
    Kawahara, Naoko
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 182 : 1171 - 1181
  • [37] The theoretical bases of urban competitiveness: does proximity matter?
    Martin, Ron
    Simmie, James
    REVUE D ECONOMIE REGIONALE ET URBAINE, 2008, (03): : 333 - 351
  • [38] Mobile home parks and crime: Does proximity matter?
    McCarty, William
    Hepworth, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF CRIME & JUSTICE, 2013, 36 (03): : 319 - 333
  • [39] Does geographical proximity matter in determining the profitability of banks?
    Ramlall, Indranarain
    JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2022, 44 (06) : 1251 - 1279
  • [40] Does proximity matter? Distance dependence of adolescent friendships
    Preciado, Paulina
    Snijders, Tom A. B.
    Burk, William J.
    Stattin, Hakan
    Kerr, Margaret
    SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2012, 34 (01) : 18 - 31