Clinicopathological risk factors and survival analysis of ovarian cancer with synchronous endometrial cancer diagnosed after surgery

被引:3
|
作者
Bakir, Mehmet Sait [1 ]
Birge, Ozer [1 ]
Karadag, Ceyda [1 ]
Dogan, Selen [1 ]
Tuncer, Hasan Aykut [1 ]
Simsek, Tayup [1 ]
机构
[1] Akdeniz Univ, Dept Gynecol Obstet, Div Gynecol Oncol, TR-07070 Antalya, Turkey
关键词
Synchronous epithelial ovarian cancer; Endometrial cancer; Endometriosis; Survival; PRIMARY NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; MALIGNANCIES; UTERINE; TRENDS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.31083/j.ejgo.2021.03.2336
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: In the present study, we tried to retrospectively evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis and survival of patients with synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancer (SOEC). Material and methods: The data of patients with ovarian cancer who had been admitted to our hospital between February 2006 and March 2019 were retrospectively obtained from the hospital's electronic archive system collected after having obtained the ethics committee approval. Thirty-six patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and simultaneously diagnosed with primary endometrial cancer were included in the study. Patients with non-epithelial ovarian cancer, recurrent, metastatic and metachronous tumor, borderline ovarian tumor, uterine sarcoma and carcinosarcoma, and patients who had not attended regular controls were excluded from the study. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using the Kaplan Meier survival analysis. The log rank test was used to test the effect of subgroups on survival. Results: The mean age of the SOEC patients included in the study was 52.05 +/- 13.46 years. Of the patients, 8.3% had endometriosis and 16.7% had concurrent adenomyosis. Optimal surgery was seen to have been performed when evaluated with regard to post-operative residual tumor (R0, R1 and R2 61.1%, 33.3% and 5.6%, respectively). The histological grade was Grade 3 in most of the patients (44.4%). When the histology of SOEC patients was examined, endometrioid type was seen to be the most frequent in 18 patients (50%), followed by the serous type in 10 patients (27.8%). The least frequent was clear histology in 2 patients (5.6%). On the other hand, with regard to the endometrial cancer histology of SOEC patients, while the most common type was endometrioid type with 27 patients (75%), serous histological type was seen in 8 patients (22.2%). The five-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 43.6% for all patients, while the overall survival (OS) was 67.1%. The median PFS was 32 months, while the median OS was 89.6 months. In the subgroup analysis was performed as serous/serous histological type with SOEC patients with endometrioid/endometrioid, the median PFS was 53.8 months for the endometrioid/endometrioid type and 11.5 months for the serous/serous type, and it was statistically significant (p: 0.001). In terms of OS for both groups, it was 110.2 and 36.8 months, respectively, and it was statistically significant (p: 0.001). Conclusion: Endometrioid type endometrial cancer is more common than serous in synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancer patients and serous type has a worse prognosis than endometrioid.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 505
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Lymphedema Predictor Factors after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Survival Analysis
    Monleon, Sandra
    Murta-Nascimento, Cristiane
    Bascuas, Iria
    Macia, Francesc
    Duarte, Esther
    Belmonte, Roser
    LYMPHATIC RESEARCH AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 13 (04) : 268 - 274
  • [32] Risk Factors for Severe Complications in Ovarian Cancer Surgery
    Egger, Eva Katharina
    Kohls, Natascha
    Stope, Matthias B.
    Condic, Mateja
    Keyver-Paik, Mignon-Denise
    Koensgen, Dominique
    Hilbert, Tobias
    Klaschik, Sven
    Exner, Daniel
    Vilz, Tim
    Mustea, Alexander
    IN VIVO, 2020, 34 (06): : 3361 - 3365
  • [33] Risk Factors for Developing Endometrial Cancer After Benign Endometrial Sampling
    Ricci, Giuseppe
    Mangino, Francesco Paolo
    Bouche, Carlo
    Fischer-Tamaro, Leo
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (02): : 380 - 381
  • [34] Risk Factors for Developing Endometrial Cancer After Benign Endometrial Sampling
    Torres, Michelle L.
    Weaver, Amy L.
    Kumar, Sanjeev
    Uccella, Stefano
    Famuyide, Abimbola O.
    Cliby, William A.
    Dowdy, Sean C.
    Gostout, Bobbie S.
    Mariani, Andrea
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 120 (05): : 998 - 1004
  • [35] Risk reduction of endometrial and ovarian cancer after bisphosphonates use: A meta-analysis
    Zhang, Xiao-san
    Zhang, Yi-ming
    Li, Bin
    Fan, Bo
    Zhao, Yan
    Yang, Shu-jun
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 150 (03) : 509 - 514
  • [36] How to manage synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer patients?
    Shin, Wonkyo
    Park, Sang-Yoon
    Kang, Sokbom
    Lim, Myong Cheol
    Seo, Sang-Soo
    BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [37] CLINICAL ASPECTS OF SYNCHRONOUS ENDOMETRIAL AND OVARIAN-CANCER
    SHUVAYEVA, NI
    VEKHOVA, LI
    SMOLYANINOVA, IV
    VOPROSY ONKOLOGII, 1986, 32 (03) : 32 - 35
  • [38] How to manage synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer patients?
    Wonkyo Shin
    Sang-Yoon Park
    Sokbom Kang
    Myong Cheol Lim
    Sang-Soo Seo
    BMC Cancer, 21
  • [39] Synchronous early-stage endometrial and ovarian cancer
    Signorelli, Mauro
    Fruscio, Robert
    Lissoni, Andrea Alberto
    Pirovano, Cecilia
    Perego, Patrizia
    Mangioni, Costantino
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2008, 102 (01) : 34 - 38
  • [40] Analysis of survival after laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer
    Nezhat, Farr
    Yadav, Jyoti
    Rahaman, Jamal
    Gretz, Herbert
    Cohen, Carmel
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 15 (02) : 181 - 187