A randomised controlled trial comparing use of lignocaine periprostatic nerve block alone and combined with diclofenac suppository for patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy

被引:10
|
作者
Ooi, Wei Ling [1 ,2 ]
Hawks, Cynthia [2 ,3 ]
Tan, Andrew H. H. [3 ]
Hayne, Dickon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Surg, Perth, WA 6160, Australia
[2] Fremantle Hosp, Dept Urol, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] West Australian Urol Res Org, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
prostate; biopsy; transrectal; diclofenac; lignocaine; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA TECHNIQUES; GUIDED BIOPSY; PAIN; MANAGEMENT; PHARMACOKINETICS; LIDOCAINE; EFFICACY; PARACETAMOL; MORBIDITY; TOLERANCE;
D O I
10.1111/bju.12610
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo examine whether or not the combination of diclofenac suppository with peri-prostatic nerve block (PPNB) was effective in reducing the degree of pain experienced during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy in a randomised single-blind placebo-controlled trial. Patients and MethodsIn all, 96 patients having a planned TRUS-guided prostate biopsy were randomised into one of the following arms on a 1:1 basis: 10mL 1% lignocaine PPNB and placebo suppository (control) or 10mL 1% lignocaine PPNB and 100mg diclofenac suppository (treatment). Pain scores were recorded using the Numerical Rating Scale for pain (0-10) at the following time-points: (i) introduction of probe, (ii) during biopsy, (iii) 1h after biopsy, (iv) later that evening (approximate to 6h after biopsy) and (v) 1 day after biopsy. Patients were asked about their preferred method for pain control if a repeat TRUS-guided prostate biopsy was required: local anaesthetic (LA) again or intravenous sedation. ResultsThere were no significant differences in age (P = 0.653) or PSA level (P = 0.584) between either study arm. The differences in pain scores between the control and treatment groups were not significant at Time 1 (probe insertion; P = 0.299), Time 2 (biopsy; P = 0.983), Time 4 (evening after; P = 0.231) and Time 5 (1 day after biopsy; P = 0.384). At Time 3 (1h after biopsy), the control pain scale scores were statistically significantly higher than the treatment pain scale scores (P = 0.044). There was no difference between treatment (87%) and control (80%) groups as to whether they would prefer to repeat the biopsy under LA (P = 0.373). ConclusionThe use of a diclofenac suppository with PPNB did not show any clinically meaningful effect in decreasing pain or improving tolerability of TRUS-guided prostate biopsy and is not recommended. PPNB TRUS-guided biopsy is extremely well tolerated, with >80% of patients electing for subsequent LA biopsy if required.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 49
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条