A randomised controlled trial comparing use of lignocaine periprostatic nerve block alone and combined with diclofenac suppository for patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy

被引:10
|
作者
Ooi, Wei Ling [1 ,2 ]
Hawks, Cynthia [2 ,3 ]
Tan, Andrew H. H. [3 ]
Hayne, Dickon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Surg, Perth, WA 6160, Australia
[2] Fremantle Hosp, Dept Urol, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] West Australian Urol Res Org, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
prostate; biopsy; transrectal; diclofenac; lignocaine; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA TECHNIQUES; GUIDED BIOPSY; PAIN; MANAGEMENT; PHARMACOKINETICS; LIDOCAINE; EFFICACY; PARACETAMOL; MORBIDITY; TOLERANCE;
D O I
10.1111/bju.12610
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo examine whether or not the combination of diclofenac suppository with peri-prostatic nerve block (PPNB) was effective in reducing the degree of pain experienced during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy in a randomised single-blind placebo-controlled trial. Patients and MethodsIn all, 96 patients having a planned TRUS-guided prostate biopsy were randomised into one of the following arms on a 1:1 basis: 10mL 1% lignocaine PPNB and placebo suppository (control) or 10mL 1% lignocaine PPNB and 100mg diclofenac suppository (treatment). Pain scores were recorded using the Numerical Rating Scale for pain (0-10) at the following time-points: (i) introduction of probe, (ii) during biopsy, (iii) 1h after biopsy, (iv) later that evening (approximate to 6h after biopsy) and (v) 1 day after biopsy. Patients were asked about their preferred method for pain control if a repeat TRUS-guided prostate biopsy was required: local anaesthetic (LA) again or intravenous sedation. ResultsThere were no significant differences in age (P = 0.653) or PSA level (P = 0.584) between either study arm. The differences in pain scores between the control and treatment groups were not significant at Time 1 (probe insertion; P = 0.299), Time 2 (biopsy; P = 0.983), Time 4 (evening after; P = 0.231) and Time 5 (1 day after biopsy; P = 0.384). At Time 3 (1h after biopsy), the control pain scale scores were statistically significantly higher than the treatment pain scale scores (P = 0.044). There was no difference between treatment (87%) and control (80%) groups as to whether they would prefer to repeat the biopsy under LA (P = 0.373). ConclusionThe use of a diclofenac suppository with PPNB did not show any clinically meaningful effect in decreasing pain or improving tolerability of TRUS-guided prostate biopsy and is not recommended. PPNB TRUS-guided biopsy is extremely well tolerated, with >80% of patients electing for subsequent LA biopsy if required.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 49
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomised controlled trial comparing use of lignocaine periprostatic nerve block alone and in combination with diclofenac suppository for patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy of prostate
    Ooi, W. L.
    Hawks, C.
    Hayne, D.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 : 100 - 100
  • [2] Comparing use of lidocaine periprostatic nerve block and diclofenac suppository alone for patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
    Senturk, Aykut Bugra
    Yaytokgil, Muhammet
    Ekici, Musa
    Sari, Sercan
    Demir, Emre
    Cakiroglu, Basri
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 71 (01) : 38 - 42
  • [3] A randomized, controlled trial comparing lidocaine periprostatic nerve block, diclofenac suppository and both for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of prostate
    Ragavan, N
    Philip, J
    Balasubramanian, SP
    De Souza, J
    Marr, C
    Javle, P
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (02): : 510 - 513
  • [4] A randomized, controlled trial comparing lidocaine periprostatic nerve block, diclofenac suppository and both for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of prostate - Editorial comment
    Soloway, MS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (02): : 513 - 513
  • [5] Comparative evaluation of bilateral pudendal nerve blockade and periprostatic nerve block in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a prospective randomised trial
    Aslan, Rahmi
    Erbin, Akif
    Eryilmaz, Recep
    Taken, Kerem
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 73 (02) : 140 - 145
  • [6] Periprostatic nerve block alone versus combined with perineal pudendal nerve block or intrarectal local anesthesia during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Aslan, Rahmi
    Erbin, Akif
    Celik, Sebahattin
    Ucpinar, Burak
    Eryilmaz, Recep
    Taken, Kerem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 (08) : 833 - 838
  • [7] Intraprostatic Local Anesthesia With Periprostatic Nerve Block for Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Liu Bingqian
    Li Peihuan
    Wu Yudong
    Wei Jinxing
    Wang Zhiyong
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (02): : 479 - 483
  • [8] Combination of lidocaine suppository and periprostatic nerve block during transrectal prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized trial
    Lunacek, Andreas
    Mrstik, Christof
    Simon, Josef
    Frauscher, Ferdinand
    Schwentner, Christian
    Radmayr, Christian
    Horninger, Wolfgang
    Plas, Eugen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 21 (11) : 1126 - 1130
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of periprostatic nerve block combined with perineal subcutaneous anaesthesia and intrarectal lidocaine gel in transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal prostate biopsy: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial
    Lv, Zhengtong
    Jiang, Huichuan
    Hu, Xiheng
    Yang, Changzhao
    Chand, Harripersaud
    Tang, Congyi
    Li, Yuan
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2020, 23 (01) : 74 - 80
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of periprostatic nerve block combined with perineal subcutaneous anaesthesia and intrarectal lidocaine gel in transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal prostate biopsy: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial
    Zhengtong Lv
    Huichuan Jiang
    Xiheng Hu
    Changzhao Yang
    Harripersaud Chand
    Congyi Tang
    Yuan Li
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2020, 23 : 74 - 80