Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability

被引:129
|
作者
Scheufler, Kai-Michael
Dohmen, Hildegard
Vougioukas, Vassilios I.
机构
[1] Hirslanden Med Ctr Aarau, Dept Neurosurg, CH-5000 Aarau, Switzerland
[2] Univ Freiburg, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Freiburg, Med Ctr, Dept Neuropathol, Freiburg, Germany
关键词
degenerative disc; instrumentation; interbody fusion; modified percutaneous transforaminal; lumbar interbody fixation;
D O I
10.1227/01.NEU.0000255388.03088.B7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous spinal instrumentation techniques may be helpful to reduce approach-related morbidity inherent to conventional open surgery. This article reports technique, clinical outcomes, and fusion rates of percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fixation (pTLIF). Results are compared with those of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fixation (oTLIF) using a muscle splitting (Wiltse) approach. METHODS: pTLIF was performed in 43 patients with single-level and 10 patients with bi- or multilevel lumbar discopathy or degenerative pseudolisthesis resulting in axial back pain and claudication, pseudoradicular, or radicular symptoms. Decompression, discectomy, and interbody cage insertion were performed through 18-mm tubular retractors followed by percutaneous pedicle screw-rod fixation. Clinical outcome was assessed by early postoperative pain scores (visual analog,score) and standardized functional outcome questionnaires (American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons lumbar spine and Roland-Morris low back pain score). Fusion rates were assessed by thin-slice computed tomographic scan at 16 months. Clinical outcome, time in the operating room, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative access-site pain were compared with an institutional reference series of 67 oTLIF procedures. RESULTS: Excellent and good clinical results were obtained in 46 (87%) out of 53 patients at 16 months. The time spent in the operating room was equivalent and the blood loss reduced compared with oTLIF (P < 0.01). There was no morbidity related to instrumentation. Postoperative pain was significantly lower after pTLIF after the second postoperative day (P < 0.01). The overall clinical outcome was not different from oTLIF at 8 and 16 months. CONCLUSION: pTLIF allows for safe and efficient minimally invasive treatment of single and multilevel degenerative lumbar instability with good clinical results. Further prospective studies investigating long-term functional results are required to assess the definitive merits of percutaneous instrumentation of the lumbar spine.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 212
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION IN DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINE DISEASE
    Gupta, Pankaj
    Sharma, Arvind
    Singh, Jitendra
    Deen, Shameer
    Tanwar, Akansha
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (105): : 17055 - 17057
  • [22] Comparison between transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Han, Shao-Yu
    Xiao, Quan
    Zhu, Guo-Tai
    Dai, Jian
    Tang, Xiao-Ming
    Sun, Hai-Lang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (02): : 3932 - 3938
  • [23] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw and Contralateral Percutaneous Transfacet Screw Fixation for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disorders
    Luo, Peng
    Shao, Rong-Xue
    Wu, Ai-Min
    Xu, Hua-Zi
    Chi, Yong-Long
    Lin, Yan
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 26 (05) : 763 - 770
  • [24] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion as an Adjunct to Posterior Instrumented Correction of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis
    Crandall, Dennis G.
    Revella, Jan
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (20) : 2126 - 2133
  • [25] Surgical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Spondylolisthesis and Degenerative Segmental Instability
    Park, Yung
    Ha, Joong Won
    Lee, Yun Tae
    Oh, Hyun Chul
    Yoo, Ju Hyung
    Kim, Hyung Bok
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 5 (04) : 228 - 236
  • [26] Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it?
    Frederic Jacquot
    Daniel Gastambide
    International Orthopaedics, 2013, 37 : 1507 - 1510
  • [27] Comparison Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lan, Tao
    Hu, Shi-Yu
    Zhang, Yuan-Tao
    Zheng, Yu-Chen
    Zhang, Rui
    Shen, Zhe
    Yang, Xin-Jian
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 112 : 86 - 93
  • [28] Efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Xi-yong
    Wang, Yun-lu
    Yang, Su
    Liao, Chang-sheng
    Li, Song-feng
    Han, Peng-yong
    Han, Peng-fei
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (09) : 5657 - 5670
  • [29] Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it?
    Jacquot, Frederic
    Gastambide, Daniel
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (08) : 1507 - 1510
  • [30] Efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xi-yong Li
    Yun-lu Wang
    Su Yang
    Chang-sheng Liao
    Song-feng Li
    Peng-yong Han
    Peng-fei Han
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 5657 - 5670