Oral dydrogesterone vs. micronized vaginal progesterone gel for luteal phase support in frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer in good prognosis patients

被引:24
|
作者
Ozer, Gonul [1 ,2 ]
Yuksel, Beril [1 ,2 ]
Cicek, Ozge Senem Yucel [3 ]
Kahraman, Semra [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Mem Hosp IVF, TR-34385 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Reprod Genet Ctr, TR-34385 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Kocaeli Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, TR-41380 Kocaeli, Turkey
关键词
Frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle; In vitro fertilization; Luteal phase support; Oral dydrogesterone; Randomized controlled trial; EMBRYO-TRANSFER CYCLES; NATURAL CYCLE; METAANALYSIS; PROTOCOLS; FRESH; IVF;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.102030
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the efficacy of oral dydrogesterone for luteal phase support (LPS) in modified natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfers (mNC-FET) compared to micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) gel. Methods: This was a randomized, single-center, parallel controlled trial conducted at an ART and Reproductive Genetics Centre within a private hospital between January and August 2019. A total of 134 women, aged below 38, were assigned randomly to receive oral dydrogesterone (n = 67) or MVP (n = 67) for LPS in mNC-FET. The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) and secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates, patients' satisfaction and tolerability of oral and vaginal progesterone. A questionnaire was developed to compare patient satisfaction and side effect profiles. Results: There was no significant difference in demographic features such as female age, body mass index, AMH levels and fresh cycle characteristics between two groups (p > 0.05). When mNC-FET outcomes were compared, OPR was 68.7 % in MVP gel group and 71.6 % in the dydrogesterone group respectively percentage difference, -2.99; 95 % CI: -17.96, 13.10) Biochemical and clinical pregnancy rates and biochemical and clinical miscarriage rates were also similar between two groups. A significantly higher patient tolerability score was present in the dydrogesterone arm (4.09 +/- 0.96 vs 3.36 +/- 1.23, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Our results suggest that oral dydrogesterone provides similar ongoing pregnancy rates compared to MVP gel as a LPS in mNC FET. Since dydrogesterone is an effective and easy-to-use option with fewer intolerable side effects including vaginal irritation, vaginal discharge, and preventing sexual intercourse, it can be used as LPS in mNC FET. (C) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Phase III randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral dydrogesterone versus micronized vaginal progesterone for luteal support in in vitro fertilization
    Tournaye, Herman
    Sukhikh, Gennady T.
    Kahler, Elke
    Griesinger, Georg
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 (05) : 1019 - 1027
  • [42] INCREASED LIVE BIRTHS AMONG PATIENTS USING INTAMUSCULAR VERSUS VAGINAL PROGESTERONE FOR LUTEAL PHASE SUPPORT DURING FROZEN BLASTOCYST TRANSFER.
    Heitmann, R. J.
    Richter, K. S.
    Devine, K.
    McKeeby, J.
    DeCherney, A. H.
    Widra, E. A.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) : S459 - S460
  • [43] Crinone Gel for Luteal Phase Support in Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial in the Chinese Population
    Wang, Yang
    He, Yaqiong
    Zhao, Xiaoming
    Ji, Xiaowei
    Hong, Yan
    Wang, Yuan
    Zhu, Qinling
    Xu, Bin
    Sun, Yun
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07):
  • [44] Dydrogesterone addition to vaginal progesterone and transfer postponement improve outcome in patients with low P levels following hormonally substituted cycles for frozen-thawed embryo transfer
    Cedrin-Durnerin, I.
    Vinolas, C.
    Krief, F.
    Dagher-Hayeck, B.
    Peigne, M.
    Sifer, C.
    Sarandi, S.
    Smires, B. Bennani
    Grynberg, M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : I304 - I304
  • [45] Individualized luteal phase support in frozen-thawed embryo transfer after intramuscular progesterone administration might rectify live birth rate
    Boynukalin, Fazilet Kubra
    Tohma, Yusuf Aytac
    Yarkiner, Zalihe
    Gultomruk, Meral
    Bozdag, Gurkan
    Ozkavukcu, Sinan
    Bahceci, Mustafa
    Demir, Berfu
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [46] Intramuscular progesterone versus 8% Crinone vaginal gel for luteal phase support following blastocyst cryopreserved single embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study
    Jennifer B. Bakkensen
    Catherine Racowsky
    Ann M. Thomas
    Andrea Lanes
    Mark D. Hornstein
    Fertility Research and Practice, 6 (1)
  • [47] Oral micronized progesterone versus vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in fresh embryo transfer cycles: a multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial
    Niu, Yue
    Liu, Hong
    Li, Xiufang
    Zhao, Junli
    Hao, Guimin
    Sun, Yun
    Zhang, Bo
    Hu, Chunxiu
    Lu, Yingli
    Ren, Chun'e
    Yuan, Yingying
    Zhang, Jie
    Lu, Yao
    Wen, Qianqian
    Guo, Min
    Sui, Mingxing
    Wang, Guili
    Zhao, Dingying
    Chen, Zi-Jiang
    Wei, Daimin
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38 : II24 - II33
  • [48] Oral dydrogesterone (OD) versus micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) for luteal phase support (LPS) in IVF/ICSI: a double blind, cross-over, pharmacokinetic study
    Mackens, S.
    Brucker, M. D.
    Illingworth, K.
    Tournaye, H.
    Blockeel, C.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 : 418 - 419
  • [49] The efficacy of subcutaneous versus vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support - a comparison in 723 blastocyst hormone replacement therapy frozen embryo transfer cycles
    Yarali, H.
    Mumusoglu, S.
    Polat, M.
    Erden, M.
    Ozbek, I. Yarali
    Esteves, S.
    Humaidan, P.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38
  • [50] A comparison of luteal phase support in graduated estradiol/progesterone replacement cycles using intramuscular progesterone alone vs. combination with vaginal suppositories on outcome following frozen embryo transfer
    Graziano, V
    Check, JH
    Dietterich, C
    Choe, JK
    Yuan, W
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 81 : S30 - S30