How to improve consumers' environmental sustainability judgements of foods

被引:72
|
作者
Lazzarini, Gianna A. [1 ]
Visschers, Vivianne H. M. [2 ]
Siegrist, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Decis, Consumer Behav, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Sch Appl Psychol, Often, Switzerland
关键词
food choices; environmental label; environmentally friendly food; guidelines; consumers' environmental evaluation; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CONSUMPTION; PERCEPTION; HEALTH; IMPACT; PRODUCTS; LABELS; FRIENDLINESS; BEHAVIOR; COUNTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.033
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Food production and consumption account for approximately one-third of households' environmental impact. Consumers thus play a major role in the shift towards more sustainable foods and diets. An overall sustainability label or simple guidelines may enable consumers to make more environmentally friendly food choices, but whether such information-based tools improve consumers' ability to choose environmentally sustainable foods has not been empirically investigated. This study's online choice task experiment shows that eco-labels and guidelines marginally increased consumers' accuracy in selecting environmentally friendly foods. Respondents adhered, however, more to guidelines than to eco-labels and led to choices with lower environmental impact. In addition, respondents showed several misconceptions related to the environmental performance of protein products, which were resistant to both eco-labels and guidelines. These findings suggest that new, costly labels may not improve consumers' environmental judgements. Instead, addressing consumers' misconceptions and finding ways to promote environmentally sustainable food purchases is essential. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 574
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Consumers' Environmental Sustainability Beliefs and Activism: A Cross-Cultural Examination
    Leonidou, Constantinos N.
    Gruber, Verena
    Schlegelmilch, Bodo B.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MARKETING, 2022, 30 (04) : 78 - 104
  • [32] The price of sustainability: How consumers trade-off conventional packaging benefits against sustainability
    Granato, Giulia
    Fischer, Arnout R. H.
    van Trijp, Hans C. M.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 365
  • [33] Clothing Disposal Behavior of Taiwanese Consumers with Respect to Environmental Protection and Sustainability
    Lai, Chih-Chun
    Chang, Ching-Erh
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (22) : 1 - 14
  • [34] A protection motivation explanation of base-of-pyramid consumers' environmental sustainability
    Zhao, Guohao
    Cavusgil, Erin
    Zhao, Yushan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 45 : 116 - 126
  • [35] CONSUMERS ASSOCIATIONS AND FOODS
    GAUSSEL, A
    ANNALES DE LA NUTRITION ET DE L ALIMENTATION, 1971, 25 (03): : 99 - &
  • [36] How Reliable is the Environmental Sustainability Index 2005?
    Tambouratzis, Tatiana
    2015 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN), 2015,
  • [37] How Systematic is the Environmental Sustainability Index 2002 as a Tool for Grouping Countries in Terms of Their Environmental Sustainability?
    Tambouratzis, Tatiana
    Hatziefthimiou, Nikos
    2017 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN), 2017, : 4087 - 4094
  • [38] Does Intelligence Improve Environmental Sustainability? An Empirical Test
    Salahodjaev, Raufhon
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 24 (01) : 32 - 40
  • [39] Understanding intercropping to improve agricultural resiliency and environmental sustainability
    Glaze-Corcoran, Samantha
    Hashemi, Masoud
    Sadeghpour, Amir
    Jahanzad, Emad
    Afshar, Reza Keshavarz
    Liu, Xiaobing
    Herbert, Stephen J.
    ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 162, 2020, 162 : 199 - 256
  • [40] Communicating Sustainability to Consumers - How to Effectively Tell Our Story.
    Ballerstedt, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 100 : 39 - 39