Marginal bone-level alterations of loaded zirconia and titanium dental implants: an experimental study in the dog mandible

被引:10
|
作者
Thoma, Daniel S. [1 ]
Benic, Goran I. [1 ]
Munoz, Fernando [2 ]
Kohal, Ralf [3 ]
Martin, Ignacio Sanz [4 ]
Cantalapiedra, Antonio G. [2 ]
Haemmerle, Christoph H. F. [1 ]
Jung, Ronald E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Clin Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Santiago Compostela, Dept Vet Clin Sci, Lugo, Spain
[3] Univ Freiburg, Dept Prosthodont, Hugstetter Str 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[4] Univ Complutense, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
关键词
bone; crowns; dental implants; titanium; X-rays; zirconium oxide; IN-VIVO; ONE-PIECE; HISTOMETRIC EVALUATION; TISSUE INTEGRATION; SUBMERGED IMPLANTS; SOFT-TISSUES; FOLLOW-UP; STABILITY; OSSEOINTEGRATION; RESTORATIONS;
D O I
10.1111/clr.12595
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThe aim was to test whether or not the marginal bone-level alterations of loaded zirconia implants are similar to the bone-level alterations of a grade 4 titanium one-piece dental implant. Materials and methodsIn six dogs, all premolars and the first molars were extracted in the mandible. Four months later, three zirconia implants (BPI, VC, ZD) and a control titanium one-piece (STM) implant were randomly placed in each hemimandible and left for transmucosal healing (baseline). Six months later, CAD/CAM crowns were cemented. Sacrifice was scheduled at 6-month postloading. Digital X-rays were taken at implant placement, crowns insertion, and sacrifice. Marginal bone-level alterations were calculated, and intra- and intergroup comparisons performed adjusted by confounding factors. ResultsImplants were successfully placed. Until crown insertion, two implants were fractured (one VC, one ZD). At sacrifice, 5 more implants were (partly) fractured (one BPI, four ZD), and one lost osseointegration (VC). No decementation of crowns occurred. All implant systems demonstrated a statistically significant (except VC) loss of marginal bone between baseline and crown insertion ranging from 0.29mm (VC; P=0.116) to 0.80mm (ZD; P=0.013). The estimated marginal bone loss between baseline and 6months of loading ranged between 0.19mm (BPI) and 1.11mm (VC), being statistically significant for STM and VC only (P<0.05). The changes in marginal bone levels were statistically significantly different between zirconia implants and control implants (STM vs. BPI P=0.007; vs. VC P=0.001; vs. ZD P=0.011). ConclusionsZirconia implants were more prone to fracture prior to and after loading with implant-supported crowns compared to titanium implants. Individual differences and variability in the extent of the bone-level changes during the 12-month study period were found between the different implant types and materials.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 420
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Guided bone regeneration at zirconia and titanium dental implants: a pilot histological investigation
    Benic, Goran I.
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Sanz-Martin, Ignacio
    Munoz, Fernando
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Cantalapiedra, Antonio
    Fischer, Jens
    Jung, Ronald E.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (12) : 1592 - 1599
  • [22] Marginal bone loss of tissue- or bone-level implants after simultaneous guided bone regeneration in the posterior mandibular region: A retrospective cohort study
    Shen, Xiaoting
    Yang, Sijia
    Xu, Yangbo
    Qi, Wenting
    He, Fuming
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2023, 25 (01) : 68 - 76
  • [23] BIOMECHANICAL CONSEQUENCES OF DENTAL IMPLANTS INSERTED IN AUGMENTED ALVEOLAR RIDGES - A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN TISSUE-LEVEL AND BONE-LEVEL IMPLANTS: FINITE ELEMENTS ANALYSIS
    Ionescu, Alecsandru
    Dodi, Aliona
    Panagopoulos, Vasileios
    Nicolescu, Mihnea Ioan
    Mihai, Augustin Traian
    Tanase, Gabriela
    Vlasceanu, Daniel
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2019, 11 (01): : 82 - 88
  • [24] Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Early Loaded Maxillary Anterior Single-Tooth Bone-Level Implants
    Vanlioglu, Burcin Akojlu
    Kahramanoglu, Erkut
    Ozkan, Yasar
    Kulak-Ozkan, Yasemin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 (06) : 1369 - 1373
  • [25] Crestal bone response to loaded zirconia and titanium implants: a radiographic and histometric analysis in canines
    Corinne E. Oeschger
    Dieter D. Bosshardt
    Stefan Roehling
    Michael Gahlert
    David L. Cochran
    Simone F. M. Janner
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2020, 24 : 3609 - 3617
  • [26] Crestal bone response to loaded zirconia and titanium implants: a radiographic and histometric analysis in canines
    Oeschger, Corinne E.
    Bosshardt, Dieter D.
    Roehling, Stefan
    Gahlert, Michael
    Cochran, David L.
    Janner, Simone F. M.
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 24 (10) : 3609 - 3617
  • [27] Marginal changes at bone-level implants supporting dental prostheses with or without intermediate standardised abutments after 36 months: Randomised controlled clinical trial
    Maceiras, Lucia
    Linares, Antonio
    Novoa, Lourdes
    Batalla, Pilar
    Mareque, Santiago
    Perez, Javier
    Blanco, Juan
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (09) : 1072 - 1080
  • [28] Less marginal bone loss around bone-level implants restored with long abutments: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tajti, Peter
    Solyom, Eleonora
    Vancsa, Szilard
    Matrai, Peter
    Hegyi, Peter
    Varga, Gabor
    Hermann, Peter
    Borbely, Judit
    Sculean, Anton
    Mikulas, Krisztina
    PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2024, 94 (01) : 627 - 638
  • [29] Comparison of Marginal Bone Level Changes of Immediately Loaded Implants, Delayed Loaded Nonsubmerged Implants, and Delayed Loaded Submerged Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Giacomel, Maria Ceclia
    Camati, Paulo
    Souza, Juliana
    Deliberador, Tatiana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (03) : 661 - 666
  • [30] Does Bruxism Affect Marginal Bone Level around Single Tooth Implants in the Posterior Mandible?
    Reza Tabrizi
    Mahdie Rasaei
    Hamidreza Moslemi
    Shervin Shafiei
    Fatemeh Latifi
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2022, 21 : 1162 - 1167