Surgical resection for recurrent retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma

被引:18
|
作者
Nathenson, Michael J. [1 ]
Barysauskas, Constance M. [2 ]
Nathenson, Robert A. [3 ]
Regine, William F. [4 ]
Hanna, Nader [4 ]
Sausville, Edward [4 ]
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Ctr Sarcoma & Bone Oncol, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Biostat & Computat Biol, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Univ Penn, 3440 Market St Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19146 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Greenebaum Canc Ctr, South Greene St Suite 9d10 Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
Soft tissue sarcoma; Retroperitoneal; Leiomyosarcoma; Liposarcoma; Overall survival; Progression-free survival; SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMA; CANCER-CENTERS-SARCOMA; FRENCH-FEDERATION; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; ADULT PATIENTS; ANATOMIC SITE; SURVIVAL; HISTOLOGY; NOMOGRAMS;
D O I
10.1186/s12957-018-1505-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas (STS) include a number of histologies but are rare, with approximately 3000 cases in the USA per year. Retroperitoneal STS have a high incidence of local and distant recurrence. The purpose of this study was to review the University of Maryland Medical Center's (UMMC) treatment experience of retroperitoneal STS, where the patient population served represents a diverse socioeconomic and ethnic catchment. Methods: IRB approval was obtained. We constructed a de-identified database of patients diagnosed with retroperitoneal liposarcomas (LPS) or leiomyosarcomas (LMS) treated at UMMC between 2000 and 2013. A total of 49 patients (Pts) with retroperitoneal STS met our eligibility criteria. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to graphically portray progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The log-rank test was used to compare time-to-event distributions. Results: The median OS for all patients (Pts) was 6.3 years, and the 2-year OS rate was 81%. The median PFS for all Pts was 1.8 years, and the 2-year PFS rate was 45%. There was no difference in OS and PFS among LMS and LPS patients; the median OS for LMS was 3.8 years vs. LPS 6.4 years (p = 0.33), and the median PFS for LMS was 1.2 years vs. LPS 2.5 years (p = 0.28). There was a significant difference between histology and race (p = 0.001). LPS were primarily Caucasian 86% vs. 14% black, whereas LMS were primarily black 52% vs. 33% Caucasian. OS was influenced by functional status, gender, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, grade, histology, tumor size, and extent of resection. PFS was influenced by AJCC stage, grade, and extent of resection. Neither adjuvant chemotherapy (1 Pt) nor neoadjuvant/adjuvant radiation therapy (18 Pts) influenced OS or PFS. There was a non-significant difference that Pts who could undergo resection of local recurrence had improved 2-year OS, with 100% LMS and LPS compared to 2-year OS of 71% (LMS) and 78% (LPS) not undergoing resection of local recurrence. Conclusions: This study suggests a higher incidence of leiomyosarcoma in the African-American population. This study confirms the prognostic importance of grade, tumor size, AJCC stage, histology, and extent of resection in patient outcomes, at a large substantially diverse academic medical center. Future research into the biological features of liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma Pts imparting these characteristics will be important to define.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF PRIMARY AND RECURRENT RETROPERITONEAL LIPOSARCOMA
    WITZ, M
    SHAPIRA, Y
    DINBAR, A
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 47 (01) : 41 - 44
  • [32] LAPAROSCOPIC LIVER RESECTION FOR METASTASIS OF RETROPERITONEAL LEIOMYOSARCOMA
    Garcia, L. Solar
    Cano, D. W. Silva
    de Leon, A. Miyar
    Bernardo, C. Garcia
    Saiz, E. Contreras
    Campos, J. L. Michi
    Pinto, I. Gonzalez
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 110
  • [33] Giant recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma presenting as a recurrent inguinal hernia
    Bhandarwar, Ajay H.
    Bakhshi, Girish D.
    Borisa, Ashok D.
    Shenoy, Sachin S.
    Kori, Channabasappa G.
    Vora, Sameer
    CLINICS AND PRACTICE, 2011, 1 (04) : 287 - 289
  • [34] Surgical Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma
    Chen, Jie
    Hang, Ying
    Gao, Qi
    Huang, Xinyu
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8
  • [35] Interdisciplinary resection of a giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma of 25 kg
    Clar, Heimo
    Leithner, Andreas
    Gruber, Gerald
    Werkgartner, Georg
    Beham, Alfred
    Windhager, Reinhard
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 79 (12) : 957 - 957
  • [36] Transperineal resection of a retroperitoneal liposarcoma presenting as a perineal mass
    Wagner, M
    Vanderlee, MG
    Freeman, J
    Black, ME
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 105 (05): : 1256 - 1258
  • [37] Resection of a Giant Liposarcoma That Fills the Whole Retroperitoneal Area
    Kilinc, Gizem
    Gul, Gulen
    Tuncer, Korhan
    Dursun, Ayberk
    Atici, Semra Demirli
    Sert, Ismail
    TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 36 (04): : 543 - 544
  • [38] Recurrent Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma: a Case Report and Literature Review
    Ramu D.
    Manjunath S.
    Anuradh G.
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 9 (4) : 640 - 643
  • [39] Predictors and outcomes of recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma with multiple tumors
    Deng, Huan
    Xu, Xingming
    Gao, Jingwang
    Huang, Jun
    Liu, Guibin
    Song, Liqiang
    Wei, Bo
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [40] Diverticulum of the duodenum - unusual appearance of retroperitoneal recurrent liposarcoma
    Metzelder, M
    Hansen, O
    Ramp, U
    CHIRURG, 2000, 71 (03): : 331 - 333