Accurate Outcome Prediction in Neuroblastoma across Independent Data Sets Using a Multigene Signature

被引:72
|
作者
De Preter, Katleen [1 ]
Vermeulen, Joelle [1 ]
Brors, Benedikt [2 ]
Delattre, Olivier [4 ]
Eggert, Angelika [5 ]
Fischer, Matthias [6 ]
Janoueix-Lerosey, Isabelle [4 ]
Lavarino, Cinzia [7 ]
Maris, John M. [8 ]
Mora, Jaume [7 ]
Nakagawara, Akira [9 ]
Oberthuer, Andre [6 ]
Ohira, Miki [9 ]
Schleiermacher, Gudrun [4 ]
Schramm, Alexander [5 ]
Schulte, Johannes H. [5 ]
Wang, Qun [8 ]
Westermann, Frank [3 ]
Speleman, Frank [1 ]
Vandesompele, Jo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Ctr Med Genet, State Univ Ghent Hosp, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Theoret Bioinformat, D-6900 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Tumour Genet, D-6900 Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Inst Curie, Inst Natl Sante & Rech Med U830, Paris, France
[5] Univ Childrens Hosp Essen, Div Hematol & Oncol, Essen, Germany
[6] Childrens Hosp Cologne, Dept Pediat Oncol, Cologne, Germany
[7] Hosp St Joan de Deu, Dev Tumor Biol Lab, Barcelona, Spain
[8] Univ Penn, Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Sch Med, Div Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[9] Chiba Canc Ctr, Res Inst, Div Biochem, Chiba 2608717, Japan
关键词
GENE-EXPRESSION PROFILES; RISK STRATIFICATION; CANCER; CLASSIFICATION; MICROARRAYS; IDENTIFICATION; AMPLIFICATION; PROGNOSIS; DIAGNOSIS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2607
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Reliable prognostic stratification remains a challenge for cancer patients, especially for diseases with variable clinical course such as neuroblastoma. Although numerous studies have shown that outcome might be predicted using gene expression signatures, independent cross-platform validation is often lacking. Experimental Design: Using eight independent studies comprising 933 neuroblastoma patients, a prognostic gene expression classifier was developed, trained, tested, and validated. The classifier was established based on reanalysis of four published studies with updated clinical information, reannotation of the probe sequences, common risk definition for training cases, and a single method for gene selection (prediction analysis of microarray) and classification (correlation analysis). Results: Based on 250 training samples from four published microarray data sets, a correlation signature was built using 42 robust prognostic genes. The resulting classifier was validated on 351 patients from four independent and unpublished data sets and on 129 remaining test samples from the published studies. Patients with divergent outcome in the total cohort, as well as in the different risk groups, were accurately classified (log-rank P < 0.001 for overall and progression-free survival in the four independent data sets). Moreover, the 42-gene classifier was shown to be an independent predictor for survival (odds ratio, >5). Conclusion: The strength of this 42-gene classifier is its small number of genes and its cross-platform validity in which it outperforms other published prognostic signatures. The robustness and accuracy of the classifier enables prospective assessment of neuroblastoma patient outcome. Most importantly, this gene selection procedure might be an example for development and validation of robust gene expression signatures in other cancer entities. Clin Cancer Res; 16(5); 1532-41. (C)2010 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:1532 / 1541
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Network-based integration of multi-omics data for clinical outcome prediction in neuroblastoma
    Conghao Wang
    Wu Lue
    Rama Kaalia
    Parvin Kumar
    Jagath C. Rajapakse
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [22] Network-based integration of multi-omics data for clinical outcome prediction in neuroblastoma
    Wang, Conghao
    Lue, Wu
    Kaalia, Rama
    Kumar, Parvin
    Rajapakse, Jagath C.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [23] Improved Outcome Prediction Across Data Sources Through Robust Parameter Tuning
    Nicole Ellenbach
    Anne-Laure Boulesteix
    Bernd Bischl
    Kristian Unger
    Roman Hornung
    Journal of Classification, 2021, 38 : 212 - 231
  • [24] Improved Outcome Prediction Across Data Sources Through Robust Parameter Tuning
    Ellenbach, Nicole
    Boulesteix, Anne-Laure
    Bischl, Bernd
    Unger, Kristian
    Hornung, Roman
    JOURNAL OF CLASSIFICATION, 2021, 38 (02) : 212 - 231
  • [25] Lung Transplant Outcome Prediction using UNOS Data
    Agrawal, Ankit
    Al-Bahrani, Reda
    Russo, Mark J.
    Raman, Jaishankar
    Choudhary, Alok
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA, 2013,
  • [26] Consilience Across Multiple, Independent Genomic Data Sets Reveals Species in a Complex with Limited Phenotypic Variation
    Wootton, Lara M.
    Forest, Felix
    Verboom, G. Anthony
    SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2023, 72 (04) : 753 - 766
  • [27] Ischemic stroke clinical outcome prediction based on image signature selection from multimodality data
    Cui, Hui
    Wang, Xiuying
    Bian, Yu
    Song, Shaoli
    Feng, David Dagan
    2018 40TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2018, : 722 - 725
  • [28] A review of integrative data analysis using across independent longitudinal studies
    Tang, Wenqing
    Zhang, Minqiang
    Zhang, Jieting
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 47 : 669 - 669
  • [29] Prediction of clinical outcome in glioblastoma using a biologically relevant nine-microRNA signature
    Hayes, Josie
    Thygesen, Helene
    Tumilson, Charlotte
    Droop, Alastair
    Boissinot, Marjorie
    Hughes, Thomas A.
    Westheadd, David
    Alder, Jane E.
    Shaw, Lisa
    Short, Susan C.
    Lawler, Sean E.
    MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY, 2015, 9 (03) : 704 - 714
  • [30] Prediction Technique for Time Series Data Sets Using Regression Models
    Sagar, Pinki
    Gupta, Prinima
    Kashyap, Indu
    ADVANCED INFORMATICS FOR COMPUTING RESEARCH, ICAICR 2018, PT I, 2019, 955 : 480 - 488