Safety of modified extended right hepatectomy in living liver donors

被引:18
|
作者
Cho, Eung-Ho [1 ]
Suh, Kyung-Suk [1 ]
Lee, Hae W. [1 ]
Shin, Woo Y. [1 ]
Yi, Nam-Joon [1 ]
Lee, Kuhn U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Seoul 110744, South Korea
关键词
living donor liver transplantation; middle hepatic vein;
D O I
10.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00520.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), the standard right graft has been adopted by many centers to meet the metabolic demands of large recipients. In conventional right liver graft, congestion at anterior section may be problematic especially when graft volume is insufficient. We previously introduced a technical aspect of modified extended right hepatectomy (MERH), in which the middle hepatic vein was excavated by preserving the entire segment 4 (Sg4) to the donor. In this report, we investigated the safety of donors who received MERH. Between August 2002 and July 2005, 97 donors underwent right liver donation. MERH was considered when remnant-left liver volume exceeded 35% of whole liver. Eighteen donors underwent MERH (MERH group, n =18). We compared the clinical outcomes of MERH group with those of donors who underwent conventional right hepatectomy (RH) with remnant liver volume exceeding 35% (RH group, n = 37). No donor mortality occurred. No intra-operative transfusion and no re-operation were performed. There were no differences in operative time (290.8 min in MERH group vs. 297.0 min in RH group, respectively), blood loss (453.3 ml vs. 426.5 ml), and postoperative hospital stay (12.5 days vs. 12.8 days) between the two groups (P > 0.05). Period of drain removal was longer in MERH group (12.5 days vs. 9.4 days, P < 0.05). But, there was no difference in complication rate between the two groups (11/18 vs. 23/37, P > 0.05). Computed tomography scan showed that congestion of Sg4 was occurred in 13 out of 18 MERH donors in early postoperative period, but all recovered at 4 months. The regeneration of the remnant liver after MERH and RH were similar (209.8% vs. 200.0% at 4 months, P > 0.05). Our results show that MERH did not impair recovery or liver regeneration in donors, and indicate that MERH can be safely done in adult LDLT when the remnant liver exceeds 35%.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 783
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Right hepatectomy in living donors with previous abdominal surgery
    Seong Hoon Kim
    Seung Duk Lee
    Young Kyu Kim
    Sang-Jae Park
    Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International, 2017, 16 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [22] IS RIGHT HEPATECTOMY FOR LIVER LIVING DONATION REALLY COMPARABLE TO RIGHT HEPATECTOMY FOR BENIGN LIVER LESIONS?
    Dondero, Federica
    Llido, Guido
    Zappa, Magaly
    Vilgrain, Valrie
    Belghiti, Jacques
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 15 (07) : S250 - S251
  • [23] Safety of hepatectomy for living donors as evaluated using asialoscintigraphy
    Kwon, AH
    Matsui, Y
    Kaibori, M
    Satoi, S
    Kamiyama, Y
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 36 (08) : 2239 - 2242
  • [24] Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Hepatectomy in Living Liver Donors: Graft Weight Discrepancy
    Seo, Jiwon
    Hong, Suk Kyun
    Lee, Sola
    Hong, Su Young
    Choi, YoungRok
    Yi, Nam-Joon
    Lee, Kwang-Woong
    Suh, Kyung-Suk
    ANNALS OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 27
  • [25] Pure Laparoscopic versus Open Right Hepatectomy in Living Liver Donors (Graft Weight Discrepancy).
    Seo, J.
    Hong, S.
    Lee, S.
    Suh, S.
    Hong, S.
    Han, E.
    Choi, Y.
    Yi, N.
    Lee, K.
    Suh, K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 22 : 1122 - 1122
  • [26] Pure laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy in living liver donors: graft weight discrepancy
    Hong, S. K.
    Seo, J.
    Lee, S.
    Suh, S.
    Hong, S. Y.
    Han, E. S.
    Choi, Y.
    Yi, N. -J.
    Lee, K. -W.
    Suh, K. -S.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 106 (8S) : 145 - 145
  • [27] Living related donors' liver regeneration after hepatectomy
    Kubota, M
    Dono, K
    Hashimoto, K
    Kato, T
    Nagano, H
    Umeshita, K
    Nakamori, S
    Sakon, M
    Monden, M
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (06) : C26 - C26
  • [28] Is Remnant Liver Volume Ratio Less Than 30% Still Contraindication to Right Hepatectomy for Living Liver Donors?
    Kim, J.
    Choi, D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 22 : 1118 - 1118
  • [29] Safety of donor right hepatectomy for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation
    Itamoto, T
    Emoto, K
    Mitsuta, H
    Fukuda, S
    Ohdan, H
    Tashiro, H
    Asahara, T
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 19 (03) : 177 - 183
  • [30] Using marginal right lobe living liver donors: Safety of expanding the margins
    Dayangac, Murat
    Taner, Burcin C.
    Akin, Baris E.
    Balci, Deniz
    Uraz, Suleyman
    Duran, Cihan
    Killi, Refik
    Ayanoglu, Omer H.
    Yuzer, Yildiray
    Tokat, Yaman
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 20 : 14 - 14