共 50 条
ENDOTOXIN REMOVAL IN SEPTIC SHOCK WITH THE ALTECO LPS ADSORBER WAS SAFE BUT SHOWED NO BENEFIT COMPARED TO PLACEBO IN THE DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL-THE ASSET STUDY
被引:11
|作者:
Lipcsey, Miklos
[1
]
Tenhunen, Jyrki
[2
]
Pischke, Soeren E.
[3
,4
]
Kuitunen, Anne
[5
,6
]
Flaatten, Hans
[7
]
De Geer, Lina
[8
,9
]
Sjolin, Jan
[10
]
Frithiof, Robert
[2
]
Chew, Michelle S.
[8
,9
]
Bendel, Stepani
[11
]
Kawati, Rafael
[2
]
Larsson, Anders
[12
]
Mollnes, Tom Eirik
[4
,13
,14
,15
]
Tonnessen, Tor Inge
[3
,16
]
Rubertsson, Sten
[2
]
机构:
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Hedenstierna Lab, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Div Emergencies & Crit Care, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Dept Immunol, Oslo, Norway
[5] Univ Tampere, Dept Intens Care, Tampere, Finland
[6] Tampere Univ Hosp, Tampere, Finland
[7] UiB Bergen, Dept Clin Med, Haukeland Univ Hosp, Bergen, Norway
[8] Linkoping Univ, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Linkoping, Sweden
[9] Linkoping Univ, Dept Med & Hlth Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[10] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci, Sect Infect Dis, Uppsala, Sweden
[11] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Kuopio, Finland
[12] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci, Sect Clin Chem, Uppsala, Sweden
[13] Nordland Hosp, Res Lab, Bodo, Norway
[14] Univ Tromso, KG Jebsen TREC, Tromso, Norway
[15] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Ctr Mol Inflammat Res, Trondheim, Norway
[16] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
来源:
基金:
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词:
Endotoxins;
gram-negative bacteria;
hemoperfusion;
septic shock;
POLYMYXIN-B HEMOPERFUSION;
ORGAN FAILURE;
SEPSIS;
GUIDELINES;
D O I:
10.1097/SHK.0000000000001503
中图分类号:
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100602 ;
摘要:
Purpose: Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) are presumed to contribute to the inflammatory response in sepsis. We investigated if extracorporeal Alteco LPS Adsorber for LPS removal in early gram-negative septic shock was feasible and safe. Also, effects on endotoxin level, inflammatory response, and organ function were assessed. Methods: A pilot, double-blinded, randomized, Phase IIa, feasibility clinical investigation was undertaken in six Scandinavian intensive care units aiming to allocate 32 septic shock patients with abdominal or urogenital focus on LPS Adsorber therapy or a Sham Adsorber, therapy without active LPS binding. The study treatment was initiated within 12 h of inclusion and given for 6 h daily on first 2 days. LPS was measured in all patients. Results: The investigation was terminated after 527 days with eight patients included in the LPS Adsorber group and seven in the Sham group. Twenty-one adverse effects, judged not to be related to the device, were reported in three patients in the LPS Adsorber group and two in the Sham group. Two patients in the Sham group and no patients in the LPS Adsorber group died within 28 days. Plasma LPS levels were low without groups differences during or after adsorber therapy. The changes in inflammatory markers and organ function were similar in the groups. Conclusions: In a small cohort of patients with presumed gram-negative septic shock, levels of circulating endotoxin were low and no adverse effects within 28 days after LPS adsorber-treatment were observed. No benefit compared with a sham device was seen when using a LPS adsorber in addition to standard care.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 231
页数:8
相关论文