ENDOTOXIN REMOVAL IN SEPTIC SHOCK WITH THE ALTECO LPS ADSORBER WAS SAFE BUT SHOWED NO BENEFIT COMPARED TO PLACEBO IN THE DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL-THE ASSET STUDY

被引:11
|
作者
Lipcsey, Miklos [1 ]
Tenhunen, Jyrki [2 ]
Pischke, Soeren E. [3 ,4 ]
Kuitunen, Anne [5 ,6 ]
Flaatten, Hans [7 ]
De Geer, Lina [8 ,9 ]
Sjolin, Jan [10 ]
Frithiof, Robert [2 ]
Chew, Michelle S. [8 ,9 ]
Bendel, Stepani [11 ]
Kawati, Rafael [2 ]
Larsson, Anders [12 ]
Mollnes, Tom Eirik [4 ,13 ,14 ,15 ]
Tonnessen, Tor Inge [3 ,16 ]
Rubertsson, Sten [2 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Hedenstierna Lab, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Div Emergencies & Crit Care, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Dept Immunol, Oslo, Norway
[5] Univ Tampere, Dept Intens Care, Tampere, Finland
[6] Tampere Univ Hosp, Tampere, Finland
[7] UiB Bergen, Dept Clin Med, Haukeland Univ Hosp, Bergen, Norway
[8] Linkoping Univ, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Linkoping, Sweden
[9] Linkoping Univ, Dept Med & Hlth Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[10] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci, Sect Infect Dis, Uppsala, Sweden
[11] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Kuopio, Finland
[12] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci, Sect Clin Chem, Uppsala, Sweden
[13] Nordland Hosp, Res Lab, Bodo, Norway
[14] Univ Tromso, KG Jebsen TREC, Tromso, Norway
[15] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Ctr Mol Inflammat Res, Trondheim, Norway
[16] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
来源
SHOCK | 2020年 / 54卷 / 02期
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Endotoxins; gram-negative bacteria; hemoperfusion; septic shock; POLYMYXIN-B HEMOPERFUSION; ORGAN FAILURE; SEPSIS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1097/SHK.0000000000001503
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) are presumed to contribute to the inflammatory response in sepsis. We investigated if extracorporeal Alteco LPS Adsorber for LPS removal in early gram-negative septic shock was feasible and safe. Also, effects on endotoxin level, inflammatory response, and organ function were assessed. Methods: A pilot, double-blinded, randomized, Phase IIa, feasibility clinical investigation was undertaken in six Scandinavian intensive care units aiming to allocate 32 septic shock patients with abdominal or urogenital focus on LPS Adsorber therapy or a Sham Adsorber, therapy without active LPS binding. The study treatment was initiated within 12 h of inclusion and given for 6 h daily on first 2 days. LPS was measured in all patients. Results: The investigation was terminated after 527 days with eight patients included in the LPS Adsorber group and seven in the Sham group. Twenty-one adverse effects, judged not to be related to the device, were reported in three patients in the LPS Adsorber group and two in the Sham group. Two patients in the Sham group and no patients in the LPS Adsorber group died within 28 days. Plasma LPS levels were low without groups differences during or after adsorber therapy. The changes in inflammatory markers and organ function were similar in the groups. Conclusions: In a small cohort of patients with presumed gram-negative septic shock, levels of circulating endotoxin were low and no adverse effects within 28 days after LPS adsorber-treatment were observed. No benefit compared with a sham device was seen when using a LPS adsorber in addition to standard care.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 231
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EFFECTS OF DOBUTAMINE ON SYSTEMIC. REGIONAL AND MICROCIRCULATORY PERFUSION PARAMETERS IN SEPTIC SHOCK, A RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, DOUBLE-BLIND, CROSSOVER STUDY
    Hernandez, G.
    Bruhn, A.
    Luengo, C.
    Regueira, T.
    Kattan, E.
    Fuentealba, A.
    Florez, J.
    Aquevedo, A.
    Pairumani, R.
    Ince, C.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 39 : S213 - S214
  • [42] Dexmedetomidine to reduce vasopressor resistance in refractory septic shock: Protocol for a double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial (ADRESS Pilot study)
    Dargent, Auguste
    Bourredjem, Abderrahmane
    Argaud, Laurent
    Levy, Bruno
    Fournel, Isabelle
    Cransac, Amelie
    Badie, Julio
    Quintin, Luc
    Quenot, Jean-Pierre
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [43] Probiotics in acute gastroenteritis-benefit or harm?: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial
    Freedman, Stephen
    Williamson-Urquhart, Sarah
    Farion, Ken
    Gouin, Serge
    Willan, Andrew
    Poonai, Naveen
    Hurley, Katrina
    Sherman, Phillip
    Finkelstein, Yaron
    Lee, Bonita
    Pang, Xiao-Li
    Chui, Linda
    Schnadower, David
    Xie, Jianling
    Gorelick, Marc
    Schuh, Suzanne
    CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 56 (10) : 1064 - 1066
  • [44] Novel renal biomarkers show that creatine supplementation is safe: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial
    Vilar Neto, Jose de Oliveira
    da Silva, Carlos Alberto
    Meneses, Gdayllon Cavalcante
    Pinto, Daniel Vieira
    Brito, Luciana Catunda
    da Cruz Fonseca, Said Goncalves
    Alves, Renata de Sousa
    Costa Martins, Alice Maria
    Assumpcao, Claudio de Oliveira
    Daher, Elizabeth De Francesco
    TOXICOLOGY RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (03) : 263 - 270
  • [45] Buprenorphine augmentation improved symptoms of OCD, compared to placebo - Results from a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trial
    Ahmadpanah, Mohammad
    Reihani, Amin
    Ghaleiha, Ali
    Soltanian, Alireza
    Haghighi, Mohammad
    Jahangard, Leila
    Bahmani, Dena Sadeghi
    Holsboer-Trachsler, Edith
    Brand, Serge
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2017, 94 : 23 - 28
  • [46] Adjunctive use of physostigmine salicylate (Anticholium®) in perioperative sepsis and septic shock: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, monocentric trial (Anticholium® per Se)
    Johannes B. Zimmermann
    Nadine Pinder
    Thomas Bruckner
    Monika Lehmann
    Johann Motsch
    Thorsten Brenner
    Torsten Hoppe-Tichy
    Stefanie Swoboda
    Markus A. Weigand
    Stefan Hofer
    Trials, 18
  • [47] Adjunctive use of physostigmine salicylate (Anticholium®) in perioperative sepsis and septic shock: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, monocentric trial (Anticholium® per Se)
    Zimmermann, Johannes B.
    Pinder, Nadine
    Bruckner, Thomas
    Lehmann, Monika
    Motsch, Johann
    Brenner, Thorsten
    Hoppe-Tichy, Torsten
    Swoboda, Stefanie
    Weigand, Markus A.
    Hofer, Stefan
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [48] Lactobacillus ruteri compared with placebo as an adjuvant in quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Mohtasham, Mahsa
    Joukar, Farahnaz
    Maroufizadeh, Saman
    Mojtahedi, Kourosh
    Asgharnezhad, Mehrnaz
    Mansour-Ghanaei, Fariborz
    ARAB JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 24 (01) : 40 - 44
  • [49] A controlled, double-blind, randomized pilot clinical trial of nicardipine as compared with a placebo in patients with moderate or severe head injury
    Sahuquillo, J
    Robles, A
    Poca, A
    Ballabriga, A
    Mercadal, J
    Secades, JJ
    REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA, 2000, 30 (05) : 401 - 408
  • [50] IBUPROFEN INTERFERES WITH THE EFFICACY OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF IBUPROFEN COMPARED WITH ACETAMINOPHEN
    RADACK, KL
    DECK, CC
    BLOOMFIELD, SS
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1987, 107 (05) : 628 - 635