ENDOTOXIN REMOVAL IN SEPTIC SHOCK WITH THE ALTECO LPS ADSORBER WAS SAFE BUT SHOWED NO BENEFIT COMPARED TO PLACEBO IN THE DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL-THE ASSET STUDY

被引:11
|
作者
Lipcsey, Miklos [1 ]
Tenhunen, Jyrki [2 ]
Pischke, Soeren E. [3 ,4 ]
Kuitunen, Anne [5 ,6 ]
Flaatten, Hans [7 ]
De Geer, Lina [8 ,9 ]
Sjolin, Jan [10 ]
Frithiof, Robert [2 ]
Chew, Michelle S. [8 ,9 ]
Bendel, Stepani [11 ]
Kawati, Rafael [2 ]
Larsson, Anders [12 ]
Mollnes, Tom Eirik [4 ,13 ,14 ,15 ]
Tonnessen, Tor Inge [3 ,16 ]
Rubertsson, Sten [2 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Hedenstierna Lab, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Div Emergencies & Crit Care, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Dept Immunol, Oslo, Norway
[5] Univ Tampere, Dept Intens Care, Tampere, Finland
[6] Tampere Univ Hosp, Tampere, Finland
[7] UiB Bergen, Dept Clin Med, Haukeland Univ Hosp, Bergen, Norway
[8] Linkoping Univ, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Linkoping, Sweden
[9] Linkoping Univ, Dept Med & Hlth Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[10] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci, Sect Infect Dis, Uppsala, Sweden
[11] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Kuopio, Finland
[12] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci, Sect Clin Chem, Uppsala, Sweden
[13] Nordland Hosp, Res Lab, Bodo, Norway
[14] Univ Tromso, KG Jebsen TREC, Tromso, Norway
[15] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Ctr Mol Inflammat Res, Trondheim, Norway
[16] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
来源
SHOCK | 2020年 / 54卷 / 02期
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Endotoxins; gram-negative bacteria; hemoperfusion; septic shock; POLYMYXIN-B HEMOPERFUSION; ORGAN FAILURE; SEPSIS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1097/SHK.0000000000001503
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) are presumed to contribute to the inflammatory response in sepsis. We investigated if extracorporeal Alteco LPS Adsorber for LPS removal in early gram-negative septic shock was feasible and safe. Also, effects on endotoxin level, inflammatory response, and organ function were assessed. Methods: A pilot, double-blinded, randomized, Phase IIa, feasibility clinical investigation was undertaken in six Scandinavian intensive care units aiming to allocate 32 septic shock patients with abdominal or urogenital focus on LPS Adsorber therapy or a Sham Adsorber, therapy without active LPS binding. The study treatment was initiated within 12 h of inclusion and given for 6 h daily on first 2 days. LPS was measured in all patients. Results: The investigation was terminated after 527 days with eight patients included in the LPS Adsorber group and seven in the Sham group. Twenty-one adverse effects, judged not to be related to the device, were reported in three patients in the LPS Adsorber group and two in the Sham group. Two patients in the Sham group and no patients in the LPS Adsorber group died within 28 days. Plasma LPS levels were low without groups differences during or after adsorber therapy. The changes in inflammatory markers and organ function were similar in the groups. Conclusions: In a small cohort of patients with presumed gram-negative septic shock, levels of circulating endotoxin were low and no adverse effects within 28 days after LPS adsorber-treatment were observed. No benefit compared with a sham device was seen when using a LPS adsorber in addition to standard care.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 231
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Abdominal Septic Shock - Endotoxin Adsorption Treatment (ASSET) - endotoxin removal in abdominal and urogenital septic shock with the Alteco® LPS Adsorber: study protocol for a double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial
    Lipcsey, Miklos
    Tenhunen, Jyrki
    Sjolin, Jan
    Frithiof, Robert
    Bendel, Stepani
    Flaatten, Hans
    Kawati, Rafael
    Kuitunen, Anne
    Tonnessen, Tor Inge
    Rubertsson, Sten
    TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [2] Abdominal Septic Shock – Endotoxin Adsorption Treatment (ASSET) – endotoxin removal in abdominal and urogenital septic shock with the Alteco® LPS Adsorber: study protocol for a double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial
    Miklos Lipcsey
    Jyrki Tenhunen
    Jan Sjölin
    Robert Frithiof
    Stepani Bendel
    Hans Flaatten
    Rafael Kawati
    Anne Kuitunen
    Tor Inge Tønnessen
    Sten Rubertsson
    Trials, 17
  • [3] Hydrocortisone for Cirrhotic Patients with Septic Shock: Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial
    Arabi, Y.
    Al Jumah, A.
    Dabbagh, O.
    Tamim, H.
    Rishu, A.
    Al Abdulkareem, A.
    Al Knawy, B.
    Hajeer, A.
    Al-Tamimi, W.
    Cherfan, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 179
  • [4] Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Thiamine as a Metabolic Resuscitator in Septic Shock: A Pilot Study
    Donnino, Michael W.
    Andersen, Lars W.
    Chase, Maureen
    Berg, Katherine M.
    Tidswell, Mark
    Giberson, Tyler
    Wolfe, Richard
    Moskowitz, Ari
    Smithline, Howard
    Ngo, Long
    Cocchi, Michael N.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (02) : 360 - 367
  • [5] Thiamine as a metabolic resuscitator in septic shock: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot trial
    M Donnino
    LW Andersen
    M Chase
    KM Berg
    TA Giberson
    H Smithline
    M Tidswell
    R Wolfe
    M Cocchi
    Critical Care, 19 (Suppl 1):
  • [6] Epinephrine versus dopamine in neonatal septic shock: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Baske, Kishore
    Saini, Shiv Sajan
    Dutta, Sourabh
    Sundaram, Venkataseshan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2018, 177 (09) : 1335 - 1342
  • [7] Epinephrine versus dopamine in neonatal septic shock: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Kishore Baske
    Shiv Sajan Saini
    Sourabh Dutta
    Venkataseshan Sundaram
    European Journal of Pediatrics, 2018, 177 : 1335 - 1342
  • [8] Thiamine as a Renal Protective Agent in Septic Shock A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
    Moskowitz, Ari
    Andersen, Lars W.
    Cocchi, Michael N.
    Karlsson, Mathias
    Patel, Parth V.
    Donnino, Michael W.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2017, 14 (05) : 737 - 741
  • [9] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with septic shock
    Stephens, Dianne P.
    Thomas, Jane H.
    Higgins, Alisa
    Bailey, Michael
    Anstey, Nicholas M.
    Currie, Bart J.
    Cheng, Allen C.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (02) : 448 - 454
  • [10] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover pilot study of a potassium channel blocker in patients with septic shock
    Warrillow, S
    Egi, M
    Bellomo, R
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (04) : 980 - 985