Reading Hegel after Marx: Lukacs and the Question of Teleology

This paper offers a rethinking of the concept of teleology in Marxist theory. In particular, I propose some reflections on Gyorgy Lukacs's teleology of labour, addressed in The Young Hegel and subsequently reworked in The Ontology of Social Being. Lukacs challenged an idealist notion of teleology understood as realisation of a transcendental principle posited a priori. He redefined the concept by showing how Hegel and Marx reintroduced the question of purpose as an essential quality of human labour. Against idealist conceptions, Lukacs reimagined teleology as a secular purpose inherent to human praxis and the key to thinking agency within a materialist concept of history. Accordingly, a Marxist concept of teleology should highlight what Ernst Bloch described as the "anticipatory" character of consciousness, whereby teleology means the positing of an end that does not yet exist in reality and that exceeds the temporal horizon of the present. However, in his critique of Hegel, Lukacs illustrates the ambivalent and contradictory dimension of teleology, a perspective that constantly relapses into temporal closure and determinism. While proposing a radical reading of Hegel, Lukacs oscillates between the two extremes of a dialectical notion of teleology that he nonetheless helped to formulate.