The use of feasibility studies for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: protocol for a review of impact and scope

被引:7
|
作者
Kristunas, Caroline A. [1 ]
Hemming, Karla [2 ]
Eborall, Helen C. [1 ]
Gray, Laura J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Dept Hlth Sci, Leicester, Leics, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 07期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DESIGN; PILOT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017290
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (SW-CRT) is a complex design, for which many decisions about key design parameters must be made during the planning. These include the number of steps and the duration of time needed to embed the intervention. Feasibility studies are likely to be useful for informing these decisions and increasing the likelihood of the main trial's success. However, the number of feasibility studies being conducted for SW-CRTs is currently unknown. This review aims to establish the number of feasibility studies being conducted for SW-CRTs and determine which feasibility issues are commonly investigated. Methods and analysis Fully published feasibility studies for SW-CRTs will be identified, according to predefined inclusion criteria, from searches conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and PsycINFO. To also identify and gain information on unpublished feasibility studies the following will be contacted: authors of published SW-CRTs (identified from the most recent systematic reviews); contacts for registered SW-CRTs (identified from clinical trials registries); lead statisticians of UK registered clinical trials units and researchers known to work in the area of SW-CRTs. Data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers. For the fully published feasibility studies, data will be extracted on the study characteristics, the rationale for the study, the process for determining progression to a main trial, how the study informed the main trial and whether the main trial went ahead. The researchers involved in the unpublished feasibility studies will be contacted to elicit the same information. A narrative synthesis will be conducted and provided alongside a descriptive analysis of the study characteristics. Ethics and dissemination This review does not require ethical approval, as no individual patient data will be used. The results of this review will be published in an open-access peer-reviewed journal.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Integrated Early Childhood Development in Cambodia: Protocol of a Cluster Stepped-Wedge Trial
    King, Katherine Merseth
    Yeng, Seng
    Brennan, Claire
    Creel, Darryl
    Ames, John W.
    Cotes, Gwyneth
    Bann, Carla M.
    Black, Maureen M.
    PEDIATRICS, 2023, 151
  • [42] Stepped-wedge trials should be classified as research for the purpose of ethical review
    Hemming, Karla
    Taljaard, Monica
    Marshall, Tom
    Goldstein, Cory E.
    Weijer, Charles
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2019, 16 (06) : 580 - 588
  • [43] Improving oxygen therapy for children and neonates in secondary hospitals in Nigeria: study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial
    Hamish R. Graham
    Adejumoke I. Ayede
    Ayobami A. Bakare
    Oladapo B. Oyewole
    David Peel
    Amy Gray
    Barbara McPake
    Eleanor Neal
    Shamim Qazi
    Rasa Izadnegahdar
    Adegoke G. Falade
    Trevor Duke
    Trials, 18
  • [44] Improving oxygen therapy for children and neonates in secondary hospitals in Nigeria: study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial
    Graham, Hamish R.
    Ayede, Adejumoke I.
    Bakare, Ayobami A.
    Oyewole, Oladapo B.
    Peel, David
    Gray, Amy
    McPake, Barbara
    Neal, Eleanor
    Qazi, Shamim
    Izadnegahdar, Rasa
    Falade, Adegoke G.
    Duke, Trevor
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [45] Comprehensive workplace intervention for cancer prevention in China (WECAN): protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial
    Li, Yuan
    Sun, Kaige
    Wang, Baohua
    Wang, Ning
    Luo, Rong
    Wang, Changqiong
    Liu, Yu
    Duffy, Stephen
    MacGregor, Graham A.
    Wu, Jing
    He, Feng J.
    Zhang, Puhong
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [46] Interdisciplinary intervention (GAIN) for adults with post-concussion symptoms: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial
    Erhard Trillingsgaard Næss-Schmidt
    Mille Møller Thastum
    Henriette Holm Stabel
    Lene Odgaard
    Asger Roer Pedersen
    Charlotte Ulrikka Rask
    Noah D. Silverberg
    Andreas Schröder
    Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen
    Trials, 23
  • [47] Falls risk score removal does not impact inpatient falls: A stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial
    Jellett, Joanna
    Williams, Cylie
    Clayton, Diana
    Plummer, Virginia
    Haines, Terry
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2020, 29 (23-24) : 4505 - 4513
  • [48] Interdisciplinary intervention (GAIN) for adults with post-concussion symptoms: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial
    Naess-Schmidt, Erhard Trillingsgaard
    Thastum, Mille Moller
    Stabel, Henriette Holm
    Odgaard, Lene
    Pedersen, Asger Roer
    Rask, Charlotte Ulrikka
    Silverberg, Noah D.
    Schroder, Andreas
    NielsenL, Jurgen Feldbaek
    TRIALS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [49] IMplementing Predictive Analytics towards efficient COPD Treatments (IMPACT): protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized impact study
    Michaux, Kristina D.
    Metcalfe, Rebecca K.
    Burns, Paloma
    Conklin, Annalijn, I
    Hoens, Alison M.
    Smith, Daniel
    Struik, Laura
    Safari, Abdollah
    Sin, Don D.
    Sadatsafavi, Mohsen
    DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [50] Systematic review showed that stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials often did not reach their planned sample size
    Eichner, Felizitas A.
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    Grobbee, Diederick E.
    Rengerink, Katrien Oude
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 107 : 89 - 100