The use of feasibility studies for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: protocol for a review of impact and scope

被引:7
|
作者
Kristunas, Caroline A. [1 ]
Hemming, Karla [2 ]
Eborall, Helen C. [1 ]
Gray, Laura J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Dept Hlth Sci, Leicester, Leics, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 07期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DESIGN; PILOT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017290
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (SW-CRT) is a complex design, for which many decisions about key design parameters must be made during the planning. These include the number of steps and the duration of time needed to embed the intervention. Feasibility studies are likely to be useful for informing these decisions and increasing the likelihood of the main trial's success. However, the number of feasibility studies being conducted for SW-CRTs is currently unknown. This review aims to establish the number of feasibility studies being conducted for SW-CRTs and determine which feasibility issues are commonly investigated. Methods and analysis Fully published feasibility studies for SW-CRTs will be identified, according to predefined inclusion criteria, from searches conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and PsycINFO. To also identify and gain information on unpublished feasibility studies the following will be contacted: authors of published SW-CRTs (identified from the most recent systematic reviews); contacts for registered SW-CRTs (identified from clinical trials registries); lead statisticians of UK registered clinical trials units and researchers known to work in the area of SW-CRTs. Data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers. For the fully published feasibility studies, data will be extracted on the study characteristics, the rationale for the study, the process for determining progression to a main trial, how the study informed the main trial and whether the main trial went ahead. The researchers involved in the unpublished feasibility studies will be contacted to elicit the same information. A narrative synthesis will be conducted and provided alongside a descriptive analysis of the study characteristics. Ethics and dissemination This review does not require ethical approval, as no individual patient data will be used. The results of this review will be published in an open-access peer-reviewed journal.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The use of feasibility studies for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: a review of impact and scope
    Kristunas, Caroline
    Hemming, Karla
    Eborall, Helen C.
    Gray, Laura J.
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [2] The current use of feasibility studies in the assessment of feasibility for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: a systematic review
    Caroline A. Kristunas
    Karla Hemming
    Helen Eborall
    Sandra Eldridge
    Laura J. Gray
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19
  • [3] The current use of feasibility studies in the assessment of feasibility for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: a systematic review
    Kristunas, Caroline A.
    Hemming, Karla
    Eborall, Helen
    Eldridge, Sandra
    Gray, Laura J.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [4] Unequal cluster sizes in stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: a systematic review
    Kristunas, Caroline
    Morris, Tom
    Gray, Laura
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (11):
  • [5] Stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trials: level of evidence, feasibility and reporting
    Haines, Terry P.
    Hemming, Karla
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2018, 64 (01) : 63 - 66
  • [6] Stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: where, when and why?
    Michael Grayling
    James Wason
    Adrian Mander
    Trials, 16
  • [7] Group sequential designs for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
    Grayling, Michael J.
    Wason, James M. S.
    Mander, Adrian P.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2017, 14 (05) : 507 - 517
  • [8] Stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: where, when and why?
    Grayling, Michael
    Wason, James
    Mander, Adrian
    TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [9] The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
    Martin, James Thomas
    Hemming, Karla
    Girling, Alan
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [10] The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
    James Thomas Martin
    Karla Hemming
    Alan Girling
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19