LI-RADS and transplantation: challenges and controversies

被引:8
|
作者
Cunha, Guilherme M. [1 ]
Tamayo-Murillo, Dorathy E. [2 ]
Fowler, Kathryn J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiol, Liver Imaging Grp, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Imaging diagnosis; Staging; Transplantation; PORTAL-VEIN THROMBOSIS; CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT RESPONSE; GADOXETIC ACID; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; ORGAN PROCUREMENT; MRI; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-019-02311-w
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Patients with early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be cured by liver transplantation. HCC imaging features on CT or MRI are specific enough to allow for definitive diagnosis and treatment without the need of confirmatory biopsy. When applied to the appropriate at-risk population the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) imaging criteria achieve high specificity and positive predictive value for the diagnosis of HCC. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) is the United States organization that aims to assure the adequate and fair distribution of livers across candidates. Given the importance of fair organ allocation, OPTN also provides stringent imaging criteria for the diagnosis of HCC aiming to avoid false positive diagnosis. Although most imaging criteria are identical for both systems, discrepancies between LI-RADS and the current OPTN classification system for HCC diagnosis exists. Main differences include, but are not limited to, the binary approach of OPTN to classify lesions as HCC or not, versus the probabilistic algorithmic approach of LI-RADS, technical and interpretation considerations, and the approach towards treated lesions. The purpose of this article is to highlight the similarities and discrepancies between LI-RADS and the current OPTN criteria for HCC diagnosis and the implications that these differences may have on the management of patients who are transplant candidates.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 42
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CEUS LI-RADS: a pictorial review
    Bartolotta, Tommaso Vincenzo
    Terranova, Maria Chiara
    Gagliardo, Cesare
    Taibbi, Adele
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [22] Hepatobiliary agents and their role in LI-RADS
    Hope, Thomas A.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Costa, Eduardo A. C.
    Yee, Judy
    Yeh, Benjamin M.
    Heiken, Jay P.
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2015, 40 (03): : 613 - 625
  • [23] Hepatobiliary agents and their role in LI-RADS
    Thomas A. Hope
    Kathryn J. Fowler
    Claude B. Sirlin
    Eduardo A. C. Costa
    Judy Yee
    Benjamin M. Yeh
    Jay P. Heiken
    Abdominal Imaging, 2015, 40 : 613 - 625
  • [24] LI-RADS: a great opportunity not to be missed
    Renzulli, Matteo
    Clemente, Alfredo
    Brocchi, Stefano
    Milandri, Matteo
    Lucidi, Vincenzo
    Vukotic, Ranka
    Cappabianca, Salvatore
    Golfieri, Rita
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 31 (03) : 283 - 288
  • [25] Implementation of LI-RADS into a radiological practice
    Siedlikowski, Stefan T.
    Kielar, Ania Z.
    Ormsby, Eleanor L.
    Bijan, Bijan
    Kagay, Christopher
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (01) : 179 - 184
  • [26] LI-RADS® algorithm: CT and MRI
    Victoria Chernyak
    Cynthia S. Santillan
    Demetri Papadatos
    Claude B. Sirlin
    Abdominal Radiology, 2018, 43 : 111 - 126
  • [27] Clinicoradiographic predictors of progression of an intermediate hepatic lesion (LI-RADS 3) to hepatocellular carcinoma (LI-RADS 5)
    Hannan, Lindsay M.
    Ojeda, Patricia I.
    Mieloszyk, Rebecca J.
    Harris, William P.
    Park, James O.
    Bhargava, Puneet
    HEPATOMA RESEARCH, 2021, 7 : 7 - 78
  • [28] Understanding LI-RADS, Its Relationship to AASLD and OPTN, and the Challenges of Its Adoption
    Joseph H. Yacoub
    Frank H. Miller
    Current Hepatology Reports, 2017, 16 (1) : 72 - 80
  • [29] Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Kierans, Andrea S.
    Song, Christopher
    Gavlin, Alexander
    Roudenko, Alexandra
    Lu, Lina
    Askin, Gulce
    Hecht, Elizabeth M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 215 (05) : 1085 - 1092
  • [30] LI-RADS US Surveillance Version 2024 for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Update to the American College of US LI-RADS
    Kamaya, Aya
    Fetzer, David T.
    Seow, James H.
    Burrowes, David P.
    Choi, Hailey H.
    Dawkins, Adrian A.
    Fung, Christopher
    Gabriel, Helena
    Hong, Cheng William
    Khurana, Aman
    Mcgillen, Kathryn L.
    Morgan, Tara A.
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Tse, Justin R.
    Rodgers, Shuchi K.
    RADIOLOGY, 2024, 313 (03)