Consensus building for developing gender-sensitive leading health indicators

被引:6
|
作者
Ben Abdelaziz, Faten [1 ]
机构
[1] WHO, Ctr Hlth Dev, Chuo Ku, Kobe, Hyogo 6510073, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00038-006-6075-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: This article seeks to describe the process of reaching consensus for a gender-sensitive set of leading health indicators between and within multi-level stakeholders from various cultural, social and economic conditions. In 2000 the WHO Centre for Health Development (WKC) embarked on a multilevel participatory process aiming at the formulation of a well-accepted set of gender-sensitive leading health indicators - and considerable interest in their use. Different stakeholders have different needs and demands for information. Failure to reach consensus between the relevant actors led to the development and use of indicators by different groups, creating situation of confusion for end users of data. Methods: The consensus process took almost two years starting from 2003 and WKC played a facilitating role in this process. The consultation process was done through different mechanisms ranging from international meetings, online voting and expert group meeting. Results: The core set of indicators was brought down to 34 leading health indicators and was pilot tested in two sites. Preliminary results of the pilot testing showed that the set was considered as valuable tool for policy and decision-making at various levels. Conclusion: The consensus over the gender-sensitive core set of leading health indicators was a relatively long and extensive process and required some kind of creativity to identify appropriate platforms for consultation. But the key point is that perspectives of multiple stakeholders were included as much as possible.
引用
收藏
页码:S11 / S18
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gender-sensitive analysis
    Kaushik, A.
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2022, 233 (02) : 69 - 69
  • [22] Developing a National Set of Health Equity Indicators Using a Consensus Building Process
    Wilf-Miron, Rachel
    Avni, Shlomit
    Valinsky, Liora
    Myers, Vicki
    Ziv, Arnona
    Peretz, Gidi
    Luxenburg, Osnat
    Saban, Mor
    Feder-Bubis, Paula
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 11 (08) : 1522 - 1532
  • [23] Gender-sensitive health: menopause from the perspective of women
    Santamaria-Perez, M. Isabel
    PANACEA-BOLETIN DE MEDICINA Y TRADUCCION, 2023, 24 (58): : 14 - 22
  • [24] Caring: Gender-sensitive ethics
    Warren, MA
    BIOETHICS, 1999, 13 (01) : 79 - 81
  • [25] Gender-sensitive health policies in Uruguay (2005-2020)
    Rufo, Virginia Cardozo
    REVISTA MEDICA DEL URUGUAY, 2022, 38 (04):
  • [26] Suggestions for a gender-sensitive and intersectional practice of health monitoring and reporting
    Mena, E.
    Jaehn, P.
    Merz, S.
    Poege, K.
    Strasser, S.
    Sass, A. C.
    Rommel, A.
    Holmberg, C.
    Bolte, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30
  • [27] Gender-Sensitive Materials and Tools: The Development of a Gender-Sensitive Toolbox Through National Stakeholder Consultations
    Christou, Eirini
    Parmaxi, Antigoni
    Perifanou, Maria
    Economides, Anastasios A.
    SOCIAL COMPUTING AND SOCIAL MEDIA: DESIGN, USER EXPERIENCE AND IMPACT, SCSM 2022, PT I, 2022, 13315 : 485 - 502
  • [28] Caring: Gender-sensitive ethics
    Fox, M
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 1998, 24 (02) : 138 - 140
  • [29] The Principles of Gender-Sensitive Parliaments
    Rincker, Meg
    POLITICS & GENDER, 2016, 12 (04)
  • [30] Caring: Gender-sensitive ethics
    Hyde, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2000, 8 (01) : 153 - 154