Genomic DNA from mice: A comparison of recovery methods and tissue sources

被引:41
|
作者
Hofstetter, JR
Zhang, AW
Mayeda, AR
Guscar, T
Nurnberger, JI
Lahiri, DK
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Inst Psychiat Res, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Richard L Roudebush Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/bmme.1997.2637
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Our aim is to identify an extraction method and the source of mouse tissue(s) that could allow a high-resolution genomic scan from a living mouse. We compared and optimized two methods for yield, purity of DNA, and their use in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of DNA extracted from different mouse tissues. In addition to whole blood, tissue samples from the brain, liver, testis, and tail were included in this study. The Rapid Method (RM) is preferable for the whole blood samples-and testis and brain tissue samples because it is quicker, less toxic, and more cost-effective than the proteinase K method (PM). For liver the PM produced higher yields of DNA with less degradation than the RM. For tail tip, the PM produced a higher yield of DNA, but the RM resulted in a higher yield of PCR product. From a living mouse, a tail snip generated a sufficient amount of DNA for several hundred PCRs but not a complete genomic scan. We suggest that the RM can be used to extract genomic DNA for a complete genomic scan which requires either testicular tissues or repeated blood samples from the suborbital sinus over several months without sacrificing the animal. (C) 1997 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 202
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Isolation of Genomic DNA from Mammalian Cells and Fixed Tissue
    Miskimen, Kristy L. S.
    Miron, Penelope L.
    CURRENT PROTOCOLS, 2023, 3 (07):
  • [42] Comparison of different human tissue processing methods for maximization of bacterial recovery
    Mohamed Askar
    Waheed Ashraf
    Brigitte Scammell
    Roger Bayston
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2019, 38 : 149 - 155
  • [43] Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound tissue acquisition methods for genomic analysis of pancreatic cancer
    Elhanafi, Sherif
    Mahmud, Nadim
    Vergara, Norge
    Kochman, Michael L.
    Das, Koushik K.
    Ginsberg, Gregory G.
    Rajala, Michael
    Chandrasekhara, Vinay
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 34 (05) : 907 - 913
  • [44] Comparison of different human tissue processing methods for maximization of bacterial recovery
    Askar, Mohamed
    Ashraf, Waheed
    Scammell, Brigitte
    Bayston, Roger
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 38 (01) : 149 - 155
  • [45] Comparison of six DNA extraction methods for recovery of fungal DNA as assessed by quantitative PCR
    Fredricks, DN
    Smith, C
    Meier, A
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 43 (10) : 5122 - 5128
  • [46] Evaluation of Lysis and Recovery of Genomic DNA from Microbiota to Maximize Efficiency for DNA Sequencing
    Proctor, Caleb
    Okparanta, Akelachi
    Ryan, Gabriella
    Easparro, Brandon
    Nash, Rodney
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2020, 34
  • [47] Systematic comparison of three genomic enrichment methods for massively parallel DNA sequencing
    Teer, Jamie K.
    Bonnycastle, Lori L.
    Chines, Peter S.
    Hansen, Nancy F.
    Aoyama, Natsuyo
    Swift, Amy J.
    Abaan, Hatice Ozel
    Albert, Thomas J.
    Margulies, Elliott H.
    Green, Eric D.
    Collins, Francis S.
    Mullikin, James C.
    Biesecker, Leslie G.
    GENOME RESEARCH, 2010, 20 (10) : 1420 - 1431
  • [48] RECOVERY AND CLONING OF GENOMIC DNA FRAGMENTS FROM DRIED AGAROSE GELS
    MATHER, MW
    KEIGHTLEY, JA
    FEE, JA
    METHODS IN ENZYMOLOGY, 1993, 218 : 695 - 704
  • [49] Comparison of performance and efficiency of four methods to extract genomic DNA from oil contaminated soils in southwestern of Iran
    Yalda Basim
    Ghasemali Mohebali
    Sahand Jorfi
    Ramin Nabizadeh
    Ata Ghadiri
    Mehdi Ahmadi Moghadam
    Farid Soleymani
    Nematollah Jaafarzadeh Haghighi Fard
    Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 2020, 18 : 463 - 468
  • [50] Comparison of six methods for the recovery of PCR-compatible microbial DNA from an agricultural biogas plant
    L. Stagnati
    G. Soffritti
    A. Lanubile
    M. Busconi
    Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2017, 101 : 3907 - 3917