Point-of-care ultrasound before attempting clean-catch urine collection in infants: a randomized controlled trial

被引:5
|
作者
Weill, Olivia [1 ]
Labrosse, Melanie [1 ]
Levy, Arielle [1 ]
Desjardins, Marie Pier [1 ]
Trottier, Evelyne D. [1 ]
Gravel, Jocelyn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, CHU St Justine, Div Emergency Med, Dept Pediat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Midstream; pediatrics emergency; POCUS; urinary tract infection; TRACT-INFECTION; BLADDER ULTRASOUND; CATHETERIZATION; DIAGNOSIS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; VALIDATION; ASPIRATION; YOUNGER; VOLUME; PAIN;
D O I
10.1017/cem.2019.30
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: A new non-invasive bladder stimulation technique has been described to obtain clean-catch urine specimens in infants. This study aimed to evaluate if point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) guided feeding protocol to measure bladder volume prior to stimulation techniques improves clean-catch urine collection success. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial study was conducted in a tertiary care pediatric emergency department. Infants aged less than 6 months needing a urine sample were randomized to either POCUS group or feeding group (standard procedure) before performing a standardized clean-catch urine stimulation technique. In the POCUS group, a feeding period was permitted if the bladder width was less than 2 cm, otherwise the clean-catch urine was performed immediately. The primary outcome was the success of the procedure defined by the collection of at least 2 mL of urine, obtained within 300 seconds of bladder stimulation manoeuvres. It was estimated that the recruitment of 200 children was necessary to yield 80% power to identify an improvement of 20% in the success rate. Results: Atotal of 201 infants were included. The procedure was not more successful in the POCUS group (48%) compared to the feeding group (54%) (Difference: 6.5%; 95% CI:-7.3 to 19.8%). The mean time to collect urine samples from randomization to sample collection was not different between the two groups. Conclusions: Our study failed to show a benefit of using POCUS to improve the success rate of stimulated clean-catch urine. Moreover, the importance of the feeding period prior to clean-catch urine manoeuvres should be evaluated further.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 652
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Point-of-care urine culture for managing urinary tract infection in primary care: a randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness
    Butler, Christopher C.
    Francis, Nick A.
    Thomas-Jones, Emma
    Longo, Mirella
    Wootton, Mandy
    Llor, Carl
    Little, Paul
    Moore, Michael
    Bates, Janine
    Pickles, Timothy
    Kirby, Nigel
    Gillespie, David
    Rumsby, Kate
    Brugman, Curt
    Gal, Micaela
    Hood, Kerenza
    Verheij, Theo
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2018, 68 (669): : E268 - E278
  • [42] How representative is a point-of-care randomized trial? Clinical outcomes of patients excluded from a point-of-care randomized controlled trial evaluating antibiotic duration for Gram-negative bacteraemia: a multicentre prospective observational cohort study
    Rossel, Anne
    Zandberg, Kimberly P. M.
    Albrich, Werner C.
    Huttner, Angela
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2022, 28 (02) : 297.e1 - 297.e6
  • [43] Evidence for clinical practice: Point-of-care application of: 'Acupuncture for chronic severe functional constipation: A randomized controlled trial'
    Alper, Brian S.
    Malone-Moses, Meghan
    Manheimer, Eric W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 10 : 57 - 58
  • [44] The Use of Point-of-Care Bacterial Autofluorescence Imaging in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Rahma, Sara
    Woods, Janet
    Brown, Sarah
    Nixon, Jane
    Russell, David
    DIABETES CARE, 2022, 45 (07) : 1601 - 1609
  • [45] The effectiveness of computer reminders for improving quality assessment for point-of-care testing in general practice—a randomized controlled trial
    Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard
    Volkert Siersma
    Susanne Reventlow
    Ruth Ertmann
    Peter Felding
    Frans Boch Waldorff
    Implementation Science, 8
  • [46] The POCUS pulse check: A randomized controlled crossover study comparing pulse detection by palpation versus by point-of-care ultrasound
    Badra, Karine
    Coutin, Alexandre
    Simard, Robert
    Pinto, Ruxandra
    Lee, Jacques S.
    Chenkin, Jordan
    RESUSCITATION, 2019, 139 : 17 - 23
  • [47] Influence of case-based e-learning on students' performance in point-of-care ultrasound courses: a randomized trial
    Hempel, Dorothea
    Sinnathurai, Sivajini
    Haunhorst, Stephanie
    Seibel, Armin
    Michels, Guido
    Heringer, Frank
    Recker, Florian
    Breitkreutz, Raoul
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (04) : 298 - 304
  • [48] Social media to supplement point-of-care ultrasound courses: the “sandwich e-learning” approach. A randomized trial
    Hempel D.
    Haunhorst S.
    Sinnathurai S.
    Seibel A.
    Recker F.
    Heringer F.
    Michels G.
    Breitkreutz R.
    Critical Ultrasound Journal, 2016, 8 (1)
  • [49] The Integrating Pharmacogenetics in Clinical Care (I-PICC) Study: Protocol for a point-of-care randomized controlled trial of statin pharmacogenetics in primary care
    Vassy, Jason L.
    Brunette, Charles A.
    Majahalme, Nilla
    Advani, Sanjay
    MacMullen, Lauren
    Hau, Cynthia
    Zimolzak, Andrew J.
    Miller, Stephen J.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 75 : 40 - 50
  • [50] Randomized controlled clinical trial of point-of-care, limited ultrasonography for trauma in the emergency department: The first Sonography Outcomes Assessment Program trial
    Melniker, Lawrence A.
    Leibner, Evan
    McKenney, Mark G.
    Lopez, Peter
    Briggs, William M.
    Mancuso, Carol A.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 48 (03) : 227 - 235