Weed Suppression in Only-Legume Cover Crop Mixtures

被引:21
|
作者
Elsalahy, Heba [1 ,2 ]
Doering, Thomas [3 ]
Bellingrath-Kimura, Sonoko [1 ,4 ]
Arends, Danny [5 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Dept Agron & Crop Sci, Albrecht Thaer Weg 5, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Assiut Univ, Fac Sci, Bot & Microbiol Dept, Assiut 71516, Egypt
[3] Univ Bonn, Agroecol & Organ Farming Grp, Hugel 6, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
[4] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Res Area Land Use & Governance, Eberswalder Str 84, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
[5] Humboldt Univ, Albrecht Daniel Thaer Inst Agr & Hort Sci, Anim Breeding Biol & Mol Genet, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2019年 / 9卷 / 10期
关键词
asynchrony; crop diversification; forage legume; functional traits; interspecific interaction; mixed cropping; weed control; SPECIES EVENNESS; PLANT DIVERSITY; LIVING MULCHES; INTERCROPS; INVASION; YIELD; PRODUCTIVITY; DENSITY; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy9100648
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Weed suppression is a potential benefit of cover crop mixtures, as species diversity may allow for combining early and late-season competition with weeds. Here, we studied if this is possible for only-legume mixtures containing species with different growth rates, by testing two legumes, alsike clover (AC; Trifolium hybridum L.) and black medic (BM; Medicago lupulina L.) in two field trials sown in 2016 and 2017. Five AC:BM ratios (100:0, 67:33, 50:50, 33:67, and 0:100) were grown at three densities (50%, 100%, and 150% of recommended seed density). Cover crop and weed aboveground biomass (CCB and WB, respectively) were harvested three times, after establishment in spring (H1), in summer (H2), and in autumn after mulching (H3). Compared to fallow plots, all monocultures and mixtures showed early-season weed suppression in terms of biomass production and more efficiency over time with an average reduction of 42%, 52%, and 96% in 2016, and 39%, 55%, and 89% in 2017 at H1, H2, and H3, respectively. Out of 54 mixture treatments, only eight mixtures showed stronger weed suppression than monocultures. Mixtures reduced WB by 28%, as an average value, in 2017 compared to the respective monocultures, but not significantly in 2016, indicating that the crop diversity effect on weeds was dependent on the growing environment. Weed suppression was significantly higher at 100% and 150% seed density than 50%, but no significant differences were determined between 100% and 150% seed density. After mulching, no density effect was observed on CCB and WB. In conclusion, AC and BM can be used as a keystone species on weed suppression for sustainable agriculture as they possess plasticity to suppress weeds when higher biomass productivity is limited by environmental conditions. However, their diversity effects are time and condition dependent. Appropriate seed density and mulching can successfully be employed in weed management, but seed density may not have an effect after mulching.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mechanisms of weed suppression by cereal rye cover crop: A review
    Silva, Gustavo Camargo
    Bagavathiannan, Muthukumar
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2023, 115 (04) : 1571 - 1585
  • [22] Impact of Rye Cover Crop Termination Timing on Cover Crop Biomass, Weed Suppression and Corn Yield
    Boakye, Daniel Adu
    Chase, Carlene A.
    Presley, Deann
    Mirsky, Steven
    Robertson, Alison
    Haramoto, Erin
    Tooker, John
    Matthiesen-Anderson, Rashelle
    Basche, Andrea
    Bagavathiannan, Muthukumar
    McVane, Jodie M.
    Loria, Kristen
    Seiter, Nick
    Adam, Jared
    Wavering, John
    Sias, Cynthia
    Waggoner, Ashley
    Tomlinson, Peter
    Flessner, Michael
    de Almeida, Tauana Ferrira
    Miller, Jarrod
    VanGessel, Mark
    Darby, Heather
    Ryan, Matthew
    Tilmon, Kelley
    Raudenbush, Amy
    Singh, Vijay
    Ruark, Matthew
    Leon, Ramon
    Ruhl, Linsey
    HORTSCIENCE, 2023, 58 (09) : S106 - S107
  • [23] Crucifer glucosinolate production in legume-crucifer cover crop mixtures
    Couedel, Antoine
    Alletto, Lionel
    Kirkegaard, John
    Justes, Eric
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2018, 96 : 22 - 33
  • [24] Seeding Rate and Planting Arrangement Effects on Growth and Weed Suppression of a Legume-Oat Cover Crop for Organic Vegetable Systems
    Brennan, Eric B.
    Boyd, Nathan S.
    Smith, Richard F.
    Foster, Phil
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2009, 101 (04) : 979 - 988
  • [25] Timing Termination of a Biofumigant Cover Crop for Weed Suppression in Chile Pepper
    Bajagain, Akash
    Lehnhoff, Erik A.
    Creamer, Rebecca
    Steiner, Robert
    Schutte, Brian J.
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 34 (02) : 142 - 152
  • [26] Optimal planting period for buckwheat cover crop for weed suppression in Florida
    Huang, Pei-wen
    Chase, Carlene
    Santos, Bielinski
    Zhao, Xin
    HORTSCIENCE, 2008, 43 (04) : 1183 - 1184
  • [27] Mechanisms of weed suppression in cover crop-based production systems
    Creamer, NG
    Bennett, MA
    Stinner, BR
    Cardina, J
    Regnier, EE
    HORTSCIENCE, 1996, 31 (03) : 410 - 413
  • [28] Cover crop mixture diversity, biomass productivity, weed suppression, and stability
    Florence, A. M.
    Higley, L. G.
    Drijber, R. A.
    Francis, C. A.
    Lindquist, J. L.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [29] Winter cover crop growth and weed suppression on the central coast of California
    Brennan, EB
    Smith, RF
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 19 (04) : 1017 - 1024
  • [30] IN ORGANIC CROP ROTATION WINTER COVER CROPS IMPROVE SOIL, WEED SUPPRESSION AND CROP YIELDS
    Madsen, Helena
    Talgre, Liina
    Eremeev, Viatcheslav
    Luik, Anne
    Maeorg, Erkki
    NORDIC VIEW TO SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, : 91 - 96