Judges as activists: how Polish judges mobilise to defend the rule of law

被引:22
|
作者
Matthes, Claudia-Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Dept Social Sci, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Rule of law; judiciary; Poland; European Union; mobilisation; POLITICS; POLAND; DEMOCRACY; SAFEGUARDS; JUDICIARY; COURTS;
D O I
10.1080/21599165.2022.2092843
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
What research on democratic backsliding often overlooks is that protest against the decline of rule of law also emerges inside state institutions. In Poland, the judges' associations are using legal means, organising public events and urging the European institutions to stand firm towards the Polish government. In this article, I analyse the judiciary's collective actions and motivations regarding on- and off-bench mobilisation. Based on in-depth interviews with judges, I show how they focus on litigation but use lobbying and protesting as complementary tools. Moreover, their networking and adaptation of measures to changing circumstances proves their ability to act strategically.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 487
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Judges and Law Reform
    Ulman, Joseph N.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1937, 189 : 229 - 229
  • [32] JUDGES AND LAW REFORM
    Phillips, Orie L.
    ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW, 1936, 31 (04): : 564 - 565
  • [33] LAW, JUDGES AND ABORTION
    BUCHERBONDET, V
    HISTORIA, 1979, (396): : 120 - &
  • [34] The Rule of Climate Policy: How Do Chinese Judges Contribute to Climate Governance without Climate Law?
    Zhu, Mingzhe
    TRANSNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2022, 11 (01) : 119 - 139
  • [35] Opposition and resistance: how judges and professional associations in Poland, Hungary, and Romania defend their independence
    Coman, Ramona
    Puleo, Leonardo
    EAST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2025, 41 (01) : 24 - 45
  • [36] How judges think
    Douglas, Lawrence R.
    TLS-THE TIMES LITERARY SUPPLEMENT, 2008, (5490): : 26 - 26
  • [37] How Judges Think
    Owens, B. Robert
    LAW AND SOCIAL INQUIRY-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION, 2016, 41 (02): : 502 - 521
  • [38] How Judges Think
    Shiffman, Stuart
    Scalia, Antonin
    Garner, Bryan A.
    JUDICATURE, 2009, 92 (04) : 170 - 172
  • [39] How Judges Think
    Flanders, Chad
    LAW AND HUMANITIES, 2009, 3 (01): : 118 - 122
  • [40] HOW JUDGES THINK
    Mirza, Ahsan
    OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL, 2009, 47 (01): : 179 - 180