Public-Private Partnerships

被引:16
|
作者
Custos, Dominique [1 ]
Reitz, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ, Coll Law, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Law, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
来源
关键词
PRIVATIZATION; LAW;
D O I
10.5131/ajcl.2009.0037
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In U.S. law, the term "public private partnership" is a term that began to be used in the late 1990s and early 2000s in two distinct but related senses. In both cases, the term is used to denote government contracts in which the private contractor takes on more responsibility than has been customary in the past for the delivery of the services contracted for. With respect to transportation infrastructure, such as highways and bridges, the term refers to a family of relatively new contract types, actively promoted by the federal government for use by state governments, such as Operations and Maintenance or Design-Build-Finance-Operate-Maintain, by which the government is able to shift much of the financing, maintenance, and/or operating cost for public infrastructure to private contractors, who may then be allowed to recoup their costs through tolls or other user payments, thus enabling the government to use the market to accomplish its purposes and to relieve public budgets of the financial burden associated with infrastructure upgrading and maintenance. By extension, the term has been applied broadly to all types of contracting out of important government services, including such things as schools and prisons, provision of health care, and even the administration of state welfare programs and financial rescue of the economy. In neither case are the contract types in question really new. There is an extensive history of such use of government contracting, both with respect to transportation infrastructure and more broadly. But the use of the term "public private partnerships" appears to symbolize a new enthusiasm for privatizing governmental functions. In both cases, this extensive use of contracting out raises important public law questions, both with respect to the ways in which the enthusiasm for contracting out has led to efforts to weaken existing legal protections for the public interest and with respect to the ways in which existing law fails to ensure that public values and interests are protected in such contracting out.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 584
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Practice of Public-Private Partnerships
    LaRocque, Norman
    SCHOOL CHOICE INTERNATIONAL: EXPLORING PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS, 2009, : 71 - 87
  • [32] Renegotiating public-private partnerships
    Sarmento, Joaquim Miranda
    Renneboog, Luc
    JOURNAL OF MULTINATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 59
  • [33] PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IN ESTONIA
    Gueldenkoh, Maret
    Silberg, Uno
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE EUROPEAN ENTREPRENEURSHIP FORUM 2015: EFFICIENCY IN THE PRIVATE AND THE PUBLIC SECTOR, 2016, : 43 - 56
  • [34] The challenge of public-private partnerships
    Lonsdale, Chris
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, 2007, 33 (02) : 311 - 319
  • [35] Privatization and public-private partnerships
    Twombly, EC
    NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2003, 32 (03) : 477 - 481
  • [36] Public-private partnerships and public-private value trade-offs
    Weihe, Gudrid
    PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 28 (03) : 153 - 158
  • [37] THE BASIC PUBLIC FINANCE OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
    Engel, Eduardo
    Fischer, Ronald
    Galetovic, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2013, 11 (01) : 83 - 111
  • [38] Public-private partnerships - A public economics perspective
    Sadka, Efraim
    CESIFO ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2007, 53 (03) : 466 - 490
  • [39] Public-Private Partnerships and the Public Accountability Question
    Forrer, John
    Kee, James Edwin
    Newcomer, Kathryn E.
    Boyer, Eric
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2010, 70 (03) : 475 - 484
  • [40] PUBLIC PROCUREMENT MECHANISMS FOR PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
    Vinogradov, Dmitri
    Shadrina, Elena
    Kokareva, Larissa
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, 2014, 14 (04) : 538 - 566