Coverage provided by the global protected-area system: Is it enough?

被引:0
|
作者
Brooks, TM [1 ]
Bakarr, MI
Boucher, T
Da Fonseca, GAB
Hilton-Taylor, C
Hoekstra, JM
Moritz, T
Olivier, S
Parrish, J
Pressey, RL
Rodrigues, ASL
Sechrest, W
Stattersfield, A
Strahm, W
Stuart, SN
机构
[1] CI, CABS, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Zool, BR-31270 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[3] Nature Conservancy, Global Prior Grp, Arlington, VA 22203 USA
[4] IUCN, SSC, Cambridge CB3 0DL, England
[5] Amer Museum Nat Hist, New York, NY 10024 USA
[6] Dept Environm Conservat, Policy & Sci Div, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
[7] IUCN, SSC, CI CABS, Biodivers Assessment Initiat, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[8] BirdLife Int, Cambridge CB3 0NA, England
[9] IUCN, Species Programme, CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland
关键词
protected areas; biodiversity; gap analysis; conservation; World Parks Congress;
D O I
10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[1081:CPBTGP]2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Protected-area targets of 10% of a biome, of a country, or of the planet have often been used in conservation planning. The new World Database on Protected Areas shows that terrestrial protected-area coverage now approaches 12% worldwide. Does this mean that the establishment of new protected areas can cease? This was the core question of the "Building Comprehensive Protected Area Systems" stream of the Fifth World Parks Congress in Durban, South Africa, in 2003. To answer it requires global gap analysis, the subject of the special section of BioScience for which this article serves as an introduction. We also provide an overview of the extraordinary data sets now available to allow global gap analysis and, based on these, an assessment of the degree to which existing protected-area systems represent biodiversity. Coverage varies geographically, but is less than 2% for some bioregions, and more than 12% of 11,633 bird, mammal, amphibian, and turtle species are wholly unrepresented. The global protected-area systems are far from complete.
引用
收藏
页码:1081 / 1091
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Status review of the protected-area system in Myanmar, with recommendations for conservation planning
    Rao, M
    Rabinowitz, M
    Khaing, ST
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2002, 16 (02) : 360 - 368
  • [12] Privately protected areas increase global protected area coverage and connectivity
    Rachel Palfrey
    Johan A. Oldekop
    George Holmes
    Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2022, 6 : 730 - 737
  • [13] Privately protected areas increase global protected area coverage and connectivity
    Palfrey, Rachel
    Oldekop, Johan A.
    Holmes, George
    NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2022, 6 (06) : 730 - +
  • [14] Prospects for stakeholder coordination by protected-area managers in Europe
    Mattsson, Brady J.
    Vacik, Harald
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2018, 32 (01) : 98 - 108
  • [15] Correspondence between the habitat of the threatened pudu (Cervidae) and the national protected-area system of Chile
    Pavez-Fox, Melissa
    Estay, Sergio A.
    BMC ECOLOGY, 2016, 16
  • [16] Timelines of Tension: Trajectories of Protected-Area Creation in the Austrian Alps
    Braun, Valerie
    Bendler, Gebhard
    Haller, Andreas
    Heinrich, Kati
    REVUE DE GEOGRAPHIE ALPINE-JOURNAL OF ALPINE RESEARCH, 2018, 106 (04):
  • [17] Evaluating and expanding the European Union's protected-area network toward potential post-2020 coverage targets
    Mueller, Anke
    Schneider, Uwe A.
    Jantke, Kerstin
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2020, 34 (03) : 654 - 665
  • [18] Protected-Area Monitoring Dilemmas: a New Tool to Assess Success
    Walker, Kendra L.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2009, 23 (05) : 1294 - 1303
  • [19] Perceived barriers to and drivers of community participation in protected-area governance
    Ward, Caroline
    Holmes, George
    Stringer, Lindsay
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2018, 32 (02) : 437 - 446
  • [20] Quantifying the extent of protected-area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement in Australia
    Cook, Carly N.
    Valkan, Rebecca S.
    Mascia, Michael B.
    McGeoch, Melodie A.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2017, 31 (05) : 1039 - 1052