Mixed conditional logistic regression for habitat selection studies

被引:157
|
作者
Duchesne, Thierry [1 ]
Fortin, Daniel [2 ]
Courbin, Nicolas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Dept Math & Stat, Ste Foy, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Dept Biol, Chaire Rech Ind CRSNG, Univ Laval Sylviculture & Faune, Ste Foy, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 加拿大创新基金会;
关键词
case-control location sampling; farmland; Global Positioning System; likelihood-ratio test; mixed multinomial logit model; Prince Albert National Park; Spatially Explicit Landscape Event Simulator; YELLOWSTONE-NATIONAL-PARK; MULTINOMIAL LOGIT MODEL; RESOURCE SELECTION; PREDATION RISK; WILDLIFE; SCALE; ELK; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01670.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
P>1. Resource selection functions (RSFs) are becoming a dominant tool in habitat selection studies. RSF coefficients can be estimated with unconditional (standard) and conditional logistic regressions. While the advantage of mixed-effects models is recognized for standard logistic regression, mixed conditional logistic regression remains largely overlooked in ecological studies. 2. We demonstrate the significance of mixed conditional logistic regression for habitat selection studies. First, we use spatially explicit models to illustrate how mixed-effects RSFs can be useful in the presence of inter-individual heterogeneity in selection and when the assumption of independence from irrelevant alternatives (IIA) is violated. The IIA hypothesis states that the strength of preference for habitat type A over habitat type B does not depend on the other habitat types also available. Secondly, we demonstrate the significance of mixed-effects models to evaluate habitat selection of free-ranging bison Bison bison. 3. When movement rules were homogeneous among individuals and the IIA assumption was respected, fixed-effects RSFs adequately described habitat selection by simulated animals. In situations violating the inter-individual homogeneity and IIA assumptions, however, RSFs were best estimated with mixed-effects regressions, and fixed-effects models could even provide faulty conclusions. 4. Mixed-effects models indicate that bison did not select farmlands, but exhibited strong inter-individual variations in their response to farmlands. Less than half of the bison preferred farmlands over forests. Conversely, the fixed-effect model simply suggested an overall selection for farmlands. 5. Conditional logistic regression is recognized as a powerful approach to evaluate habitat selection when resource availability changes. This regression is increasingly used in ecological studies, but almost exclusively in the context of fixed-effects models. Fitness maximization can imply differences in trade-offs among individuals, which can yield inter-individual differences in selection and lead to departure from IIA. These situations are best modelled with mixed-effects models. Mixed-effects conditional logistic regression should become a valuable tool for ecological research.
引用
收藏
页码:548 / 555
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Variable selection for sparse logistic regression
    Zanhua Yin
    Metrika, 2020, 83 : 821 - 836
  • [32] Variable selection in logistic regression models
    Zellner, D
    Keller, F
    Zellner, GE
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2004, 33 (03) : 787 - 805
  • [33] Testing for violations of the homogeneity needed for conditional logistic regression
    Rieger, R. H.
    Weinberg, C. R.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2009, 36 (10) : 1147 - 1157
  • [34] OUTLIER TESTS FOR LOGISTIC-REGRESSION - A CONDITIONAL APPROACH
    BEDRICK, EJ
    HILL, JR
    BIOMETRIKA, 1990, 77 (04) : 815 - 827
  • [35] Inference using conditional logistic regression with missing covariates
    Lipsitz, SR
    Parzen, M
    Ewell, M
    BIOMETRICS, 1998, 54 (01) : 295 - 303
  • [36] Conditional versus unconditional logistic regression in the medical literature
    Rahman, M
    Sakamoto, J
    Fukui, T
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (01) : 101 - 102
  • [37] Variable Selection in Logistic Regression Model
    Zhang Shangli
    Zhang Lili
    Qiu Kuanmin
    Lu Ying
    Cai Baigen
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS, 2015, 24 (04) : 813 - 817
  • [38] Variable Selection in Logistic Regression Model
    ZHANG Shangli
    ZHANG Lili
    QIU Kuanmin
    LU Ying
    CAI Baigen
    ChineseJournalofElectronics, 2015, 24 (04) : 813 - 817
  • [39] Ensemble Logistic Regression for Feature Selection
    Zakharov, Roman
    Dupont, Pierre
    PATTERN RECOGNITION IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 7036 : 133 - 144
  • [40] Variable selection for sparse logistic regression
    Yin, Zanhua
    METRIKA, 2020, 83 (07) : 821 - 836