Comparison of Perioperative Complications in Anterior Decompression With Fusion and Posterior Decompression With Fusion for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Propensity Score Matching Analysis Using a Nation-Wide Inpatient Database

被引:24
|
作者
Yoshii, Toshitaka [1 ]
Morishita, Shingo [1 ]
Inose, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Yuasa, Masato [1 ]
Hirai, Takashi [1 ]
Okawa, Atsushi [1 ]
Fushimi, Kiyohide [2 ]
Fujiwara, Takeo [3 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Grad Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Informat, Grad Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dept Global Hlth Promot, Grad Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
anterior fusion; complication; ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; posterior fusion;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000003469
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A retrospective comparative study. Objective. To compare the perioperative complications and costs of anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and posterior decompression with fusion (PDF) for patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Summary of Background Data. Surgical treatment of cervical OPLL has a high risk of various complications. ADF and PDF are effective for the treatment of cervical OPLL; however, few studies have compared the two procedures in terms of the perioperative surgical complications. Methods. Patients undergoing ADF and PDF for cervical OPLL from 2010 to 2016 were identified in a nation-wide inpatient database. We investigated systemic and local complications, length of hospital stay, costs for hospitalization, reoperation, and mortality. Propensity score was calculated from patients' characteristics and preoperative comorbidities, and one to one matching was performed. Results. Propensity score-matching produced 854 pairs of patients who underwent ADF and PDF. The rate of at least one systemic complication was significantly higher in the ADF group (P = 0.004). The incidence rates of postoperative respiratory failure (P = 0.034) and dysphagia (P = 0.008) were significantly higher in the ADF group. The rates of pneumonia (P = 0.06) and hoarseness (P = 0.08) also tended to be higher in the ADF group. However, no difference was found in the mortality rate (P = 0.22). In the local complications, spinal fluid leakage was significantly higher in the ADF group (P < 0.001). However, blood transfusion rate was significantly higher in the PDF group (P = 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the PDF group (P < 0.001) and the cost for hospitalization was greater in the PDF group (P < 0.001). Conclusion. The present study demonstrated that perioperative complications, such as respiratory failure, dysphagia, and spinal fluid leakage, were more common in the ADF group. However, hospital stay was longer in the PDF group, and the cost for hospitalization was greater in the PDF group.
引用
收藏
页码:E1006 / E1012
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Anterior and Posterior Segmental Decompression and Fusion for Severely Localized Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament of the Cervical Spine: Technical Note
    Arima, Hironori
    Naito, Kentaro
    Yamagata, Toru
    Kawahara, Shinichi
    Ohata, Kenji
    Takami, Toshihiro
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2019, 59 (06) : 238 - 245
  • [22] Surgical outcomes of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: Anterior decompression and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty
    Xu, Ping
    Zhuang, Jing-Shen
    Huang, Yu-Sheng
    Tu, Chen
    Chen, Jian-Ting
    Zhong, Zhao-Ming
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2019, 27 (02)
  • [23] Anterior Decompression and Fusion for the Treatment of Cervical Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Narrative Review
    Park, Sehan
    Lee, Dong-Ho
    Lee, Choon Sung
    Hwang, Chang-Ju
    Yang, Jae Jun
    Cho, Jae Hwan
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 17 (03) : 582 - 594
  • [24] ANTERIOR DECOMPRESSION FOR OSSIFICATION OF THE POSTERIOR LONGITUDINAL LIGAMENT OF THE CERVICAL-SPINE
    ABE, H
    TSURU, M
    ITO, T
    IWASAKI, Y
    KOIWA, M
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1981, 55 (01) : 108 - 116
  • [25] Comparison of Perioperative Complications Between Anterior Fusion and Posterior Fusion for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in Elderly Patients Propensity Score-Matching Analysis Using Nationwide Inpatient Database
    Morishita, Shingo
    Yoshii, Toshitaka
    Okawa, Atsushi
    Inose, Hiroyuki
    Hirai, Takashi
    Ogawa, Takahisa
    Fushimi, Kiyohide
    Fujiwara, Takeo
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (10): : E586 - E592
  • [26] Anterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament A meta-analysis
    Chen, Tao-ping
    Qian, Li-gang
    Jiao, Jian-bao
    Li, Qing-gui
    Sun, Bo
    Chen, Kang
    Wang, Yun-fei
    Liang, Zhi-xing
    Chen, Yu-min
    Meng, Jie
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (01)
  • [27] Posterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xu, Ping
    Sun, Guo-Dong
    Xun, Lu
    Huang, Shi-Shu
    Li, Zhi-Zhong
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2021, 44 (03) : 1457 - 1469
  • [28] Posterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ping Xu
    Guo-Dong Sun
    Lu Xun
    Shi-Shu Huang
    Zhi-Zhong Li
    Neurosurgical Review, 2021, 44 : 1457 - 1469
  • [29] Posterior decompression with instrumented fusion for thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament
    Masashi Yamazaki
    Akihiko Okawa
    Takayuki Fujiyoshi
    Takeo Furuya
    Masao Koda
    European Spine Journal, 2010, 19 : 691 - 698
  • [30] Posterior decompression with instrumented fusion for thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament
    Yamazaki, Masashi
    Okawa, Akihiko
    Fujiyoshi, Takayuki
    Furuya, Takeo
    Koda, Masao
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 19 (05) : 691 - 698