共 50 条
The Use of 23.4% Hypertonic Saline for the Management of Elevated Intracranial Pressure in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Study
被引:81
|作者:
Kerwin, Andrew J.
[1
]
Schinco, Miren A.
[1
]
Tepas, Joseph J., III
[1
]
Renfro, William H.
[3
]
Vitarbo, Elizabeth A.
[2
]
Muehlberger, Michael
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Florida, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, Jacksonville, FL 32209 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Jacksonville, FL 32209 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Shands Jacksonville Med Ctr, Dept Pharm, Jacksonville, FL 32209 USA
来源:
关键词:
Hypertonic saline;
Severe traumatic brain injury;
Intracranial pressure;
Mannitol;
CEREBRAL OXYGEN DELIVERY;
HEAD-INJURY;
FLUID RESUSCITATION;
HYPERTENSION;
MANNITOL;
EPIDEMIOLOGY;
REDUCTION;
HEMORRHAGE;
DEXTRAN;
UREA;
D O I:
10.1097/TA.0b013e3181acc726
中图分类号:
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100602 ;
摘要:
Background: Oncotic agents are a therapeutic mainstay for the management of intracranial hypertension. Both mannitol and varied concentrations of hypertonic saline (HTS) have been shown to be effective at reducing elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). We compared the safety and efficacy of 23.4% HTS to mannitol for acute management of elevated ICP after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: After approval from our institutional review board, the records of patients admitted with severe TBI who received mannitol or HTS were reviewed. Demographic and physiologic data were recorded. ICP, cerebral perfusion pressure, reduction of ICP after dose administration, serum sodium, osmolality, and magnitude of dose response during the subsequent 60 minutes were analyzed. Efficacy was determined by comparison of proportion of patients with any response and mean change in ICP after dosing with either agent. Safety was determined by recording any new postinfusion electrolyte or neurologic anomalies. Data were compared using chi(2) test, accepting p < 0.05 as significant. Results: Twenty-two patients with severe TBI received 210 doses of either mannitol or HTS. All patients suffered severe blunt injury (mean Injury Severity Score 28 +/- 11). HTS patients had a significantly higher ICP at the initiation of therapy than that of mannitol group (30.7 +/- 7.94 mm Hg vs. 28.3 +/- 8.07 mm Hg, respectively). There was no difference in initial cerebral perfusion pressure. Mean ICP reduction in the hour after administration of 102 doses of mannitol and 108 doses of HTS was greater for patients receiving HTS (9.3 +/- 7.37 mm Hg vs. 6.4 +/- 6.57 mm Hg, respectively; p = 0.0028, chi(2)). More patients responded to HTS (92.6% HTS vs. 74% mannitol; p = 0.0002, chi(2)). There was no significant difference between groups in the duration of ICP reduction after dose administration (4.1 hours vs. 3.8 hours, respectively). No adverse events after administration of either agent were identified. Conclusion: Based on this retrospective analysis, 23.4% HTS is more efficacious than mannitol in reducing ICP. If these results are confirmed in a prospective, randomized study, 23.4% HTS may become the agent of choice for the management of elevated ICP after TBI.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 282
页数:6
相关论文