The Vancouver Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model: Assessment by Using a Subset of the National Lung Screening Trial Cohort

被引:30
|
作者
White, Charles S. [1 ]
Dharaiya, Ekta [2 ]
Campbell, Erin [3 ]
Boroczky, Lilla [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Diagnost Radiol, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Philips Healthcare, Highland Hts, OH USA
[3] Philips Res North Amer, Briarcliff Manor, NY USA
关键词
CT;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2016152627
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the likelihood of malignancy among a subset of nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) by using a risk calculator based on nodule and patient characteristics. Materials and Methods: All authors received approval for use of NLST data. An institutional review board exemption and a waiver for informed consent were granted to the author with an academic appointment. Nodule characteristics and patient attributes with regard to benign and malignant nodules in the NLST were applied to a nodule risk calculator from a group in Vancouver, Canada. Patient populations and their nodule characteristics were compared between the NLST and Vancouver cohorts. Multiple thresholds were tested to distinguish benign nodules from malignant nodules. An optimized threshold value was used to determine positive and negative predictive values, and a full logistic regression model was applied to the NLST data set. Results: Sufficient data were available for 4431 nodules (4315 benign nodules and 116 malignant nodules) from the NLST data set. The NLST and Vancouver data sets differed in that the former included fewer nodules per study, fewer nonsolid nodules, and more nodule spiculation and emphysema. A composite risk score threshold of 10% was determined to be optimal, demonstrating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 85.3%, 93.9%, 27.4%, and 99.6%, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve for the full regression model applied to the NLST database demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.963 (95% confidence interval: 0.945, 0.974). Conclusion: Application of an NLST data subset to the Vancouver risk calculator yielded a high discriminant value, which supports the use of a risk calculator method as a valuable approach to distinguish between benign and malignant nodules. (C) RSNA, 2016
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 272
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The (US) National Lung Cancer Screening Trial: intensifying the debate about the introduction of screening for lung cancer
    Baldwin, D. R.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF EDINBURGH, 2012, 42 (02): : 131 - 132
  • [42] Variation In The Efficacy Of Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Lung Screening Based On Risk Of Lung Cancer Mortality In The National Lung Screening Trial
    Katki, H. A.
    Kovalchik, S. A.
    Tammemagi, M. C.
    Berg, C.
    Caporaso, N.
    Riley, T.
    Korch, M.
    Silvestri, G. A.
    Chaturvedi, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 187
  • [43] Lung Cancer Deaths in the National Lung Screening Trial Attributed to Nonsolid Nodules
    Yip, Rowena
    Yankelevitz, David F.
    Hu, Minxia
    Li, Kunwei
    Xu, Dong Ming
    Jirapatnakul, Artit
    Henschke, Claudia I.
    RADIOLOGY, 2016, 281 (02) : 589 - 596
  • [44] Time to first morning cigarette and lung cancer in National Lung Screening Trial
    Gu, Fangyi
    Katki, Hormuzd
    Freedman, Neal
    Marcus, Pam
    Caporaso, Neil
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [45] Genetic Susceptibility to Lung Cancer and COPD in the National Lung Screening Trial: The Differing Role of Genes Conferring Risk in the Screening Setting
    Young, R. P.
    Hopkins, R. J.
    Duan, F.
    Chiles, C.
    Aberle, D.
    Silvestri, G. A.
    Billings, P.
    Gamble, G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 199
  • [46] Predictors of Smoking Cessation in Lung Cancer Screening: A Secondary Analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial
    Thomas, N.
    Ward, R.
    Tanner, N. T.
    Rojewski, A.
    Toll, B.
    Gebregzhiaber, M.
    Silvestri, G. A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 205
  • [47] Characterizing Screen-Detected Small Cell Lung Cancer in a Lung Cancer Screening Program and in the National Lung Screening Trial
    Ruane, B. M.
    Shusted, C. S.
    Muse, E.
    Emeigh-McBride, L.
    Jackson, B.
    Kane, G. C.
    Evans, N. R., III
    McIntire, R.
    Zeigler-Johnson, C.
    Juon, H.
    Barta, J. A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 205
  • [48] Survival Following Detection of Stage I Lung Cancer by Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial
    Gierada, David S.
    Pinsky, Paul F.
    CHEST, 2021, 159 (02) : 862 - 869
  • [49] Development and Validation of a Multivariable Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model That Includes Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening Results A Secondary Analysis of Data From the National Lung Screening Trial
    Tammemagi, Martin C.
    ten Haaf, Kevin
    Toumazis, Iakovos
    Kong, Chung Yin
    Han, Summer S.
    Jeon, Jihyoun
    Commins, John
    Riley, Thomas
    Meza, Rafael
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (03) : e190204
  • [50] Lung cancer risk in welders and foundry workers with a history of heavy smoking in the USA: The National Lung Screening Trial
    Wong, Jason Y. Y.
    Bassig, Bryan A.
    Seow, Wei Jie
    Hu, Wei
    Ji, Bu-Tian
    Blair, Aaron
    Silverman, Debra T.
    Lan, Qing
    OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 74 (06) : 440 - 448