The Vancouver Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model: Assessment by Using a Subset of the National Lung Screening Trial Cohort

被引:30
|
作者
White, Charles S. [1 ]
Dharaiya, Ekta [2 ]
Campbell, Erin [3 ]
Boroczky, Lilla [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Diagnost Radiol, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Philips Healthcare, Highland Hts, OH USA
[3] Philips Res North Amer, Briarcliff Manor, NY USA
关键词
CT;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2016152627
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the likelihood of malignancy among a subset of nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) by using a risk calculator based on nodule and patient characteristics. Materials and Methods: All authors received approval for use of NLST data. An institutional review board exemption and a waiver for informed consent were granted to the author with an academic appointment. Nodule characteristics and patient attributes with regard to benign and malignant nodules in the NLST were applied to a nodule risk calculator from a group in Vancouver, Canada. Patient populations and their nodule characteristics were compared between the NLST and Vancouver cohorts. Multiple thresholds were tested to distinguish benign nodules from malignant nodules. An optimized threshold value was used to determine positive and negative predictive values, and a full logistic regression model was applied to the NLST data set. Results: Sufficient data were available for 4431 nodules (4315 benign nodules and 116 malignant nodules) from the NLST data set. The NLST and Vancouver data sets differed in that the former included fewer nodules per study, fewer nonsolid nodules, and more nodule spiculation and emphysema. A composite risk score threshold of 10% was determined to be optimal, demonstrating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 85.3%, 93.9%, 27.4%, and 99.6%, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve for the full regression model applied to the NLST database demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.963 (95% confidence interval: 0.945, 0.974). Conclusion: Application of an NLST data subset to the Vancouver risk calculator yielded a high discriminant value, which supports the use of a risk calculator method as a valuable approach to distinguish between benign and malignant nodules. (C) RSNA, 2016
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 272
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A benchmark of deep learning approaches to predict lung cancer risk using national lung screening trial cohort
    Jiang, Yifan
    Ebrahimpour, Leyla
    Despres, Philippe
    Manem, Venkata SK.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [2] Effect Of Screening CT Findings On Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Within The National Lung Screening Trial
    Robbins, H. A.
    Berg, C.
    Cheung, L. C.
    Chaturvedi, A.
    Katki, H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 195
  • [3] Lung Nodule Cancer Risk In The National Lung Screening Trial
    Nair, V. S.
    Sundaram, V.
    Desai, M.
    Gould, M. K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 195
  • [4] Validation of the Spitz lung cancer risk prediction model with the Dutch Belgian randomized lung cancer screening trial (NELSON) cohort
    D'Amelio, Anthony M.
    Baecke, Eleonora
    Spitz, Margaret R.
    de Koning, Harry J.
    van Klaveren, Rob J.
    Etzel, Carol J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 71
  • [5] Effect of screening CT results and features on lung cancer risk prediction within the National Lung Screening Trial
    Robbins, Hilary A.
    Berg, Christine D.
    Cheung, Li C.
    Chaturvedi, Anil K.
    Katki, Hormuzd A.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [6] Interstitial Lung Abnormalities and Lung Cancer Risk in the National Lung Screening Trial
    Brown, Stacey-Ann Whittaker
    Padilla, Maria
    Mhango, Grace
    Powell, Charles
    Salvatore, Mary
    Henschke, Claudia
    Yankelevitz, David
    Sigel, Keith
    De-Torres, Juan P.
    Wisnivesky, Juan
    CHEST, 2019, 156 (06) : 1195 - 1203
  • [7] Personalizing lung cancer risk prediction and imaging follow-up recommendations using the National Lung Screening Trial dataset
    Hostetter, Jason M.
    Morrison, James J.
    Morris, Michael
    Jeudy, Jean
    Wang, Kenneth C.
    Siegel, Eliot
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2017, 24 (06) : 1046 - 1051
  • [8] National Lung Screening Trial A Breakthrough in Lung Cancer Screening?
    White, Charles S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2011, 26 (02) : 86 - 87
  • [9] Lung cancer risk and scarring on imaging and histology in the National Lung Screening Trial
    Van Dyke, Alison L.
    Berg, Christine D.
    Caporaso, Neil E.
    Katki, Hormuzd A.
    Chaturvedi, Anil K.
    Engels, Eric A.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [10] Occupational Risk, Race, and Lung Cancer Incidence in the National Lung Screening Trial
    Barta, J.
    Rojulpote, M.
    Lake, M.
    McIntire, R.
    Juon, H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 199