Surgical time independently affected by surgical team size

被引:57
|
作者
Cassera, Maria A. [1 ]
Zheng, Bin [1 ]
Martinec, Danny V. [1 ]
Dunst, Christy M. [1 ]
Swanstroem, Lee L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Legacy Hlth Syst, Minimally Invas Surg Program, Portland, OR 97210 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 2009年 / 198卷 / 02期
关键词
Team size; Team composition; OR efficiency; Communication; Team cooperation; Laparoscopic surgery; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; OPERATING-ROOM; CARDIAC-SURGERY; SKILLS; COMMUNICATION; MANAGEMENT; ERROR; SIMULATIONS; TECHNOLOGY; FAILURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.10.016
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Team size and composition provide essential data for the study of operating room (OR) efficiency. METHODS: Laparoscopic procedures between July 2005 and July 2007 were reviewed retrospectively to record the number of OR personnel and the procedure time (PT). RESULTS: Of 399 procedures reviewed, 360 cases with complete data were analyzed. The average PT was 148 minutes. A mean of 8 different team members (range, 4-15) were involved. Surgeons and anesthesiologists stayed constant whereas the OR nurses were replaced more than once per procedure (mean, 4 nurses/procedure; range, 2-11). Multiple regression analysis revealed that both complexity of surgery and team size affected the PT significantly. When procedure complexity and patient condition were held constant, we found that adding 1 individual to a team predicted a 15.4-minutes increase in PT. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical team is a dynamic system with a large amount of member turnover. Efforts to improve OR efficiency should focus on decreasing surgical team size, limiting staff turnover, and enhancing communication between team members. (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 222
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The surgical time-out: the relationship between perceptions of a safety-task anchor and surgical team workflow
    Zagarese, Vivian J.
    Hernandez, Ivan
    Hauenstein, Neil M. A.
    Foti, Roseanne J.
    Parker, Sarah H.
    BMC SURGERY, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [32] Dedicated robotics team reduces pre-surgical preparation time
    Lasser, Michael S.
    Patel, Chintan K.
    Elsamra, Sammy E.
    Renzulli, Joseph F., II
    Haleblian, George E.
    Pareek, Gyan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 28 (03) : 263 - 266
  • [33] Is Migraine Surgery Ready for Prime Time? The Surgical Team's View
    Guyuron, Bahman
    HEADACHE, 2015, 55 (10): : 1464 - 1473
  • [34] Evaluation of adherence to measures for the prevention of surgical site infections by the surgical team
    de Oliveira, Adriana Cristina
    Gama, Camila Sarmento
    REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2015, 49 (05) : 764 - 770
  • [35] Successful Development and Implementation of a Surgical Response Team for Emergent Surgical Cases
    Pichoff, Amy M.
    Shah, Abha
    Baer, John
    Staab, Jared
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (01) : 45 - 47
  • [36] Surgical Team Assessment Training: improving surgical teams during deployment
    Kellicut, Dwight C.
    Kuncir, Eric J.
    Williamson, Hope M.
    Masella, Pamela C.
    Nielsen, Peter E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 208 (02): : 275 - 283
  • [37] Surgical Smoke and Transmission of Coronavirus to Surgical Team Members; a Letter to Editor
    Imani, Behzad
    Merajikhah, Amirmohammad
    Khazaei, Salman
    Bouraghi, Hamid
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2021, 28 (05) : 654 - 655
  • [38] A survey on assesment of surgical gowns based on the opinions of surgical team members
    Pamuk, Oktay
    Ondogan, Ziynet
    TEKSTIL VE KONFEKSIYON, 2008, 18 (02): : 142 - 148
  • [39] Optimizing Austere Surgical Team Efficiency: An Evaluation of Team Composition During US Air Force Ground Surgical Team Training
    Edmonds, Maj Robert J.
    Hirwantwari, Didier N.
    Hansen, Dallas G.
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 2025,
  • [40] Surgical Team Familiarity: An Integrative Review
    Stucky, Christopher H.
    De Jong, Marla J.
    AORN JOURNAL, 2021, 113 (01) : 64 - 75