Machine learning method for predicting pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement

被引:17
|
作者
Truong, Vien T. [1 ,2 ]
Beyerbach, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Mazur, Wojciech [1 ,2 ]
Wigle, Matthew [1 ,2 ]
Bateman, Emma [3 ]
Pallerla, Akhil [4 ]
Ngo, Tam N. M. [1 ,2 ]
Shreenivas, Satya [1 ,2 ]
Tretter, Justin T. [5 ]
Palmer, Cassady [1 ,2 ]
Kereiakes, Dean J. [1 ,2 ]
Chung, Eugene S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Christ Hosp, Hlth Network, Cincinnati, OH 45219 USA
[2] Lindner Res Ctr, 2123 Auburn Ave,Ste 424, Cincinnati, OH 45219 USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Lexington, KY USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Inst Heart, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
来源
关键词
machine learning; pacemaker implantation; prediction; random forest; TAVR; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY; CONDUCTION DISTURBANCES; RANDOM FOREST; RISK; OUTCOMES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/pace.14163
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background An accurate assessment of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) risk following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is important for clinical decision making. The aims of this study were to investigate the significance and utility of pre- and post-TAVR ECG data and compare machine learning approaches with traditional logistic regression in predicting pacemaker risk following TAVR. Methods Five hundred fifity seven patients in sinus rhythm undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis (AS) were included in the analysis. Baseline demographics, clinical, pre-TAVR ECG, post-TAVR data, post-TAVR ECGs (24 h following TAVR and before PPI), and echocardiographic data were recorded. A Random Forest (RF) algorithm and logistic regression were used to train models for assessing the likelihood of PPI following TAVR. Results Average age was 80 +/- 9 years, with 52% male. PPI after TAVR occurred in 95 patients (17.1%). The optimal cutoff of delta PR (difference between post and pre TAVR PR intervals) to predict PPI was 20 ms with a sensitivity of 0.82, a specificity of 0.66. With regard to delta QRS, the optimal cutoff was 13 ms with a sensitivity of 0.68 and a specificity of 0.59. The RF model that incorporated post-TAVR ECG data (AUC 0.81) more accurately predicted PPI risk compared to the RF model without post-TAVR ECG data (AUC 0.72). Moreover, the RF model performed better than logistic regression model in predicting PPI risk (AUC: 0.81 vs. 0.69). Conclusions Machine learning using RF methodology is significantly more powerful than traditional logistic regression in predicting PPI risk following TAVR.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 340
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predictors of Late (≥30-Days) Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Okoh, Alexis K.
    Obaidi, Nawar
    Singh, Swaiman
    Khakwani, Zain
    Haik, Bruce
    Chen, Chunguang
    Cohen, Marc
    Russo, Mark
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 13 (04) : S48 - S48
  • [42] Outcomes Following Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement SWEDEHEART Observational Study
    Rack, Andreas
    Saleh, Nawzad
    Glaser, Natalie
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 14 (19) : 2173 - 2181
  • [43] Conduction disorders and permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement-a systematic review
    Zirngast, B.
    Marangozova, N.
    Yates, A.
    Maechler, H.
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2020, 132 : S260 - S260
  • [44] ;Electrocardiographic and Imaging Predictors for Permanent Pacemaker (PPM) Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)
    Routh, Jared M.
    Joseph, Lee
    Marthaler, Brodie R.
    Bhave, Prashant
    CIRCULATION, 2015, 132
  • [45] Risk of permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Which factors are most relevant?
    Batta, Akash
    Hatwal, Juniali
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 16 (02): : 49 - 53
  • [46] Rates of Late Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Kawsara, Akram
    Berzingi, Chalak
    Alkhouli, Mohamad
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 182 : 104 - 105
  • [47] Shifting Trends in Timing of Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Mazzella, Anthony J.
    Hendrickson, Michael J.
    Arora, Sameer
    Sanders, Mason
    Li, Quefeng
    Vavalle, John P.
    Gehi, Anil K.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 14 (02) : 232 - 234
  • [48] Prognostic impact of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Sharobeem, Sam
    Boulmier, Dominique
    Leurent, Guillaume
    Bedossa, Marc
    Leclercq, Christophe
    Mabo, Philippe
    Martins, Raphael P.
    Tomasi, Jacques
    Verhoye, Jean-Philippe
    Donal, Erwan
    Sost, Gwenaelle
    Le Guellec, Marielle
    Le Breton, Herve
    Auffret, Vincent
    HEART RHYTHM, 2022, 19 (07) : 1124 - 1132
  • [49] A prediction model for permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Qi, Yiming
    Lin, Xiaolei
    Pan, Wenzhi
    Zhang, Xiaochun
    Ding, Yuefan
    Chen, Shasha
    Zhang, Lei
    Zhou, Daxin
    Ge, Junbo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 28 (01)
  • [50] Incidence and Predictors of Pacemaker Implantation in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Maan, Abhishek
    Refaat, Marwan M.
    Heist, Edwin Kevin
    Passeri, Jonathan
    Inglessis, Ignacio
    Ptaszek, Leon
    Vlahakes, Gus
    Ruskin, Jeremy N.
    Palacios, Igor
    Sundt, Thoralf
    Mansour, Moussa
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 38 (07): : 878 - 886