Allergic contact dermatitis from methyldibromo glutaronitrile in a sanitary pad and review of Australian clinic data

被引:22
|
作者
Williams, Jason D. [1 ]
Frowen, Kathryn E. [1 ]
Nixon, Rosemary L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Skin & Canc Fdn, Occupat Dermatol Res & Educ Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3053, Australia
关键词
adhesive; Australia; biocide; Euxyl((R)); K400; glue; occupational; Tektamer; 38; A; D; vulva;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01040.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Methyldibromo glutaronitrile (MDBGN) has rarely been reported as an allergen in adhesives but is recognized as a common allergen in skin care products in Europe. It has been banned for use in leave-on products by the European Union. In this study, we present a case with an unusual source of this common allergen and review all cases of allergy to MDBGN from our clinics over a 12-year period. A 49-year-old nurse presented with dermatitis affecting the vulva caused by MDBGN present in her sanitary pad. All other cases of allergy to MDBGN in patients attending the occupational dermatology or contact dermatitis clinics at the Skin and Cancer Foundation, Victoria, between January 1993 and December 2004, were reviewed. Patch testing was positive to her sanitary pad, the adhesive and MDBGN, which were used as a biocide in the pad adhesive. Only 20 cases of allergy to MDBGN have been diagnosed in 2837 patients tested during this period (0.7%). To conclude, this study highlights the importance of considering allergic contact dermatitis in the differential diagnosis of vulval rashes and the emergence of MDBGN as an important sensitizer. However, our review suggests that MDBGN remains an infrequent cause of allergy in Australia.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 167
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] NICKEL ALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS - A REVIEW
    MENNE, T
    MAIBACH, HI
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF TOXICOLOGY, 1989, 8 (07): : 1271 - 1273
  • [32] Consort Allergic Contact Dermatitis: A Systematic Review
    Lee, Jaewon
    Guo, Sarah
    Dinalo, Jennifer
    DeLeo, Vincent A.
    Adler, Brandon L.
    DERMATITIS, 2022, 33 (03) : 181 - 186
  • [33] Allergic contact dermatitis from enoxolone
    Tanaka, S
    Otsuki, T
    Matsumoto, Y
    Hayakawa, R
    Sugiura, M
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2001, 44 (03) : 192 - 192
  • [34] Allergic contact dermatitis from grasses
    Koh, D
    Goh, CL
    Tan, HTW
    Ng, SK
    Wong, WK
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1997, 37 (01) : 32 - 34
  • [35] Allergic contact dermatitis from lanoconazole
    Nakano, R
    Miyoshi, H
    Kanzaki, T
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1996, 35 (01) : 63 - 63
  • [36] CONTACT ALLERGIC DERMATITIS FROM OATMEAL
    RIBOLDI, A
    PIGATTO, PD
    ALTOMARE, GF
    GIBELLI, E
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1988, 18 (05) : 316 - 317
  • [37] Allergic contact dermatitis from tromantadine
    Jauregui, I
    Urrutia, I
    Gamboa, PM
    Antepara, I
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY & CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1997, 7 (04): : 260 - 261
  • [38] Allergic contact dermatitis from myrrh
    Gallo, R
    Rivara, G
    Cattarini, G
    Cozzani, E
    Guarrera, M
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1999, 41 (04) : 230 - 231
  • [39] Allergic contact dermatitis from calcipotriol
    Park, YK
    Lee, JH
    Chung, WG
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2002, 82 (01) : 71 - 72
  • [40] Allergic contact dermatitis from gold
    Wiesner, M
    Pambor, M
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1998, 38 (01) : 52 - 53