Multiple attribute decision-making methods for the dynamic operator allocation problem

被引:65
|
作者
Yang, Taho
Chen, Mu-Chen
Hung, Chih-Ching
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Inst Mfg Engn, Tainan 701, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Dept Business Management, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
AHP; fuzzy set theory; integrated circuit packaging; multiple attribute decision making; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.matcom.2006.04.002
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This study explores two multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) methods to solve a dynamic operator allocation problem. Both methods use an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to determine attribute weights a priori. The first method uses a technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). The second method incorporates a fuzzy-based logic that uses linguistic variable representation, fuzzy operation, and fuzzy defuzzification. The TOPSIS uses deterministic performance ratings and attribute weights, whilst the fuzzy-based is a linguistic method. An applied case study drawn from existing literature is used to demonstrate and test findings. The proposed methods systematically evaluate alternative scenarios, with the result indicating promise for solving an operator allocation decision problem. (c) 2006 IMACS. Published by Elsevier BX All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 299
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] INTERACTIVE WEIGHT ASSESSMENT IN MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING
    MOND, B
    ROSINGER, EE
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1985, 22 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [22] RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN GOALS IN MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING
    FELIX, R
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1994, 67 (01) : 47 - 52
  • [23] Multi-attribute decision making with dynamic weight allocation
    Jiao, Hongqiang
    Wang, Shuangyou
    INTELLIGENT DECISION TECHNOLOGIES-NETHERLANDS, 2014, 8 (03): : 225 - 230
  • [24] Sustainable Assessment of Aerosol Pollution Decrease Applying Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Methods
    Cereska, Audrius
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Cavallaro, Fausto
    Podvezko, Valentinas
    Tetsman, Ina
    Grinbergiene, Irina
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (07)
  • [25] Applying multiple attribute decision-making methods to solve the problematic selection of living environment
    Chu, Chien-Chien
    Chiang, Ting-Yi
    Perng, Yeng-Horng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE AND MATERIALS (IFEESM 2017), 2017, 120 : 44 - 49
  • [26] Heronian mean operators of linguistic neutrosophic multisets and their multiple attribute decision-making methods
    Fan, Changxing
    Hu, Keli
    Feng, Sheng
    Ye, Jun
    Fan, En
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISTRIBUTED SENSOR NETWORKS, 2019, 15 (04)
  • [27] Evaluation of environmentally conscious manufacturing programs using multiple attribute decision-making methods
    Rao, R. V.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART B-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANUFACTURE, 2008, 222 (03) : 441 - 451
  • [28] Comparison of Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Methods-TOPSIS and PROMETHEE for Distribution Systems
    Kamble, S. G.
    Vadirajacharya, K.
    Patil, U. V.
    COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, ICCASP 2018, 2019, 810 : 669 - 680
  • [29] An investigation on the multiple attribute decision making (MADM) methods for solving the cell formation problem
    Ahi, Arshia
    Ashtiani, Behzad
    Aryanezhad, Mir-Bahador
    Makui, Ahmad
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2007, : 709 - 712
  • [30] Z Linguistic-induced ordered weighted averaging operator for multiple attribute group decision-making
    Xian, Sidong
    Chai, Jiahui
    Guo, Hailin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (02) : 271 - 296