Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire (SDQ-20)

被引:10
|
作者
Isabel Gonzalez-Vazquez, Ana [1 ]
del Rio-Casanova, Lucia [2 ]
Seijo-Ameneiros, Natalia [3 ]
Cabaleiro-Fernandee, Paloma [4 ,5 ]
Seoane-Pillado, Teresa [6 ]
Justo-Alonso, Ania
Santed-German, Miguel Angel [7 ]
机构
[1] Complexo Hosp Univ A Coruna, La Coruna, Spain
[2] Clin Assistens, La Coruna, Spain
[3] Ctr Psicol Trauma, Ferrol, Spain
[4] Ctr Psicoterapia, Orense, Spain
[5] Inst Invest Biomed A Coruna INIBIC, La Coruna, Spain
[6] Clin Assistens, Vigo, Spain
[7] Univ Nacl Educ Distancia, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Conversion disorders; dissociative disorders; stress disorders; post-traumatic; validation study; CHILDHOOD TRAUMA; PSYCHOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISSOCIATION; SCID-D; DISORDERS; CONVERSION; SYMPTOMS; SOMATIZATION; ADOLESCENTS; ETIOLOGY;
D O I
10.7334/psicothema2016.346
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: The Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire (SDQ-20) is a self-reported questionnaire measuring somatoform dissociation. The aim of this study is to analyze the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the SDQ-20 and its short version (SDQ-5). Methods: Validity and reliability were examined in a sample of 360 psychiatric outpatients: 38 dissociative (conversion) disorders, 30 dissociative (psychoform) disorders, and 292 patients suffering from other disorders. Dissociative disorders were diagnosed using the SCID-D and a specific interview for conversion disorders. Results: Subjects meeting criteria for any dissociative or conversion disorder scored significantly higher in the SDQ-20 (criterion validity). Somatoform dissociation, psychoform dissociation and early trauma were significantly correlated (construct validity). An alpha coefficient of .866 (reliability) and a test-retest correlation of 0.91 were obtained. The cut-off score maximizing sensitivity and specificity was 27.5 for psychoform dissociative disorders (sensitivity of 81.6% and specificity of 71.0%) and 29.5 for conversion disorders (81.6% and 71.0%). For the SDQ-5, the coefficient alpha was 0.561 and the selected cut-off score was 5.5 (sensitivity of 73.33% and specificity of 70.41%). Conclusions: The Spanish version of the SDQ-20 presents good psychometric properties while the SDQ-5 shows worse characteristics and its use with Spanish samples is not recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 280
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reliability and validity of a Turkish version of Leicester cough questionnaire
    Gonen, Nazmiye Akis
    Havlucu, Yavuz
    Yorgancioglu, Arzu
    Goktalay, Tugba
    Coskun, Aysin Sakar
    Celik, Pinar
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2015, 46
  • [42] The reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of the Surgical Fear Questionnaire
    Wittmann Victoria
    Csabai Marta
    Drotos Gergely
    Lazar Gyorgy
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2018, 159 (47) : 1988 - 1993
  • [43] Reliability and validity of Leicester Cough Questionnaire Korean version
    Han, Jong-Min
    Jung, In-Chul
    Kang, Weechang
    Kim, Seung-Su
    Yeo, Yoon
    Park, Yang-Chun
    CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2014, 11 (03) : 147 - 152
  • [44] Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Pain Disability Questionnaire
    Yoon, Jisun
    Choi, Kyoung Hyo
    Kim, Tae Woo
    Yang, Seo Yon
    Sim, Mi Kyung
    ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2013, 37 (06): : 814 - 823
  • [45] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Breathlessness Beliefs Questionnaire
    Wu, Qing
    Guo, AiMin
    Zhao, YanWei
    Li, Sijia
    Huang, Hui
    CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2018, 15 (02) : 114 - 122
  • [46] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire
    Erdogan, Sengul
    Ucpunar, Habibe K.
    Cangoz Tavat, Banu
    TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI, 2022, 33 (04) : 274 - 279
  • [47] Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire
    Lin, Chuan-Ju
    Shiah, I-Shin
    Chu, Hsin
    Tsai, Pei-Shan
    Chen, Chiung-Hua
    Chang, Yue-Cune
    Chou, Kuei-Ru
    ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRIC NURSING, 2011, 25 (01) : 53 - 62
  • [48] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Parenting Concerns Questionnaire
    Yanai, Misa
    Aoyama, Maho
    Kosugi, Kazuhiro
    Tsumura, Akemi
    Nakanishi, Erika
    Miyashita, Mitsunori
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 54 (07) : 797 - 804
  • [49] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Childhood Trauma Questionnaire
    Sar, Vedat
    Ozturk, Erdinc
    Ikikardes, Eda
    TURKIYE KLINIKLERI TIP BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2012, 32 (04): : 1054 - 1063
  • [50] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
    S. Sarmer
    S. Ergin
    G. Yavuzer
    Rheumatology International, 2000, 20 : 9 - 12