Requirements elicitation for robotic and computer-assisted minimally invasive surgery

被引:5
|
作者
Nakawala, Hirenkumar [1 ]
De Momi, Elena [1 ]
Tzemanaki, Antonia [2 ]
Dogramadzi, Sanja [2 ]
Russo, Andrea [3 ]
Catellani, Michele [3 ]
Bianchi, Roberto [3 ]
De Cobelli, Ottavio [3 ,4 ]
Sideridis, Aristotelis [5 ]
Papacostas, Emmanuel [5 ]
Koupparis, Anthony [6 ]
Rowe, Edward [6 ]
Persad, Raj [6 ]
Ascione, Raimondo [7 ,8 ]
Ferrigno, Giancarlo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Dept Comp Sci, Via Str le Grazie 15, I-37134 Verona, Italy
[2] Univ West England, Bristol Robot Lab, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] European Inst Oncol, Div Urol, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Oncol & Hematol Oncol, Milan, Italy
[5] TheMIS Orthopaed Ctr, Thessaloniki, Greece
[6] North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol Urol Inst, Bristol, Avon, England
[7] Univ Bristol, Translat Biomed Res Ctr, Bristol, Avon, England
[8] Univ Bristol, Bristol Heart Inst, Bristol, Avon, England
来源
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Robot-assisted surgery; computer-assisted interventions; user requirement specifications;
D O I
10.1177/1729881419865805
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The robotic surgical systems and computer-assisted technologies market has seen impressive growth over the last decades, but uptake by end-users is still scarce. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive and informed list of the end-user requirements for the development of new generation robot- and computer-assisted surgical systems and the methodology for eliciting them. The requirements were elicited, in the frame of the EU project SMARTsurg, by conducting interviews on use cases of chosen urology, cardiovascular and orthopaedics procedures, tailored to provide clinical foundations for scientific and technical developments. The structured interviews resulted in detailed requirement specifications which are ranked according to their priorities. Paradigmatic surgical scenarios support the use cases.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reliability of computer-assisted periacetabular osteotomy using a minimally invasive approach
    Sepp De Raedt
    Inger Mechlenburg
    Maiken Stilling
    Lone Rømer
    Ryan J. Murphy
    Mehran Armand
    Jyri Lepistö
    Marleen de Bruijne
    Kjeld Søballe
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2018, 13 : 2021 - 2028
  • [32] Minimally invasive and robotic surgery
    Mack, MJ
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (05): : 568 - 572
  • [33] Computer-assisted and Robotic Surgery in Orthopedics: Where We Are in 2014
    Goradia, Vipool K.
    SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 2014, 22 (04): : 202 - 205
  • [34] COMPUTER-ASSISTED SURGERY
    ADAMS, L
    KRYBUS, W
    MEYEREBRECHT, D
    RUEGER, R
    GILSBACH, JM
    MOESGES, R
    SCHLOENDORFF, G
    IEEE COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND APPLICATIONS, 1990, 10 (03) : 43 - 51
  • [35] COMPUTER-ASSISTED SURGERY
    SOHN, N
    ROBBINS, RD
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (14): : 924 - 924
  • [36] Computer-assisted surgery
    Hozack, William J.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2007, 30 (02) : 109 - 110
  • [37] Computer-assisted surgery
    Gebhard, F
    Kinzl, L
    Arand, M
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2000, 103 (08): : 612 - 617
  • [38] Computer-assisted surgery
    Feussner, H.
    COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2018, 40 (02) : 100 - 101
  • [39] Soft Tissue Deformation Tracking for Robotic Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Stoyanov, Danail
    Yang, Guang-Zhong
    2009 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-20, 2009, : 254 - 257
  • [40] Optimizing the Setup Configuration for Manual and Robotic Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Woern, H.
    Weede, O.
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOL 25, PT 6, 2009, 25 : 55 - 58