Photon extremity absorbed dose and kerma conversion coefficients for calibration geometries

被引:3
|
作者
Veinot, K. G. [1 ]
Hertel, N. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, George W Woodruff Sch Mech Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
来源
HEALTH PHYSICS | 2007年 / 92卷 / 02期
关键词
dose; absorbed; photons; extremities; dosimetry; personnel;
D O I
10.1097/01.HP.0000243165.43316.78
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Absorbed dose and dose equivalent conversion coefficients are routinely used in personnel dosimetry programs. These conversion coefficients can be applied to particle fluences or to measured air kerma values to determine appropriate operational monitoring quantities such as the ambient dose equivalent or personal dose equivalent for a specific geometry. For personnel directly handling materials, the absorbed dose to the extremities is of concern. This work presents photon conversion coefficients for two extremity calibration geometries using ringer and wrist/arm phantoms described in HPS N13.32. These conversion coefficients have been calculated as a function of photon energy in terms of the kerma and the absorbed dose using Monte Carlo techniques and the calibration geometries specified in HPS N13.32. Additionally, kerma and absorbed dose conversion coefficients for commonly used x-ray spectra and calibration source fields are presented. The kerma values calculated in this work for the x-ray spectra and calibration sources compare well to those listed in HPS N13.32. The absorbed dose values, however, differ significantly for higher energy photons because charged particle equilibrium conditions have not been satisfied for the shallow depth. Thus, the air-kerma-to-dose and exposure-to-dose conversion coefficients for Cs-137 and Co-60 listed in HPS N13.32 overestimate the absorbed dose to the extremities. Applying the conversion coefficients listed in HPS N13.32 for Cs-137, for example, would result in an overestimate of absorbed dose of 62% for the ringer phantom and 55% for the wrist phantom.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 185
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Monte Carlo evaluation of uncertainties in photon and electron TG-51 absorbed dose calibration
    Mcdermott, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (07):
  • [42] Phantom conversion factors to derive absorbed-dose to water from a calibration in a solid phantom
    Seuntjens, J
    Olivares, M
    Evans, M
    Podgorsak, E
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1319 - 1319
  • [43] Monte-Carlo-computed dose, kerma and fluence distributions in heterogeneous slab geometries irradiated by small megavoltage photon fields
    Kumar, Sudhir
    Nahum, Alan E.
    Chetty, Indrin J.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (17):
  • [44] Partial kerma factors for high-energy hadron absorbed dose calculations
    Gorbatkov, DV
    Kryuchkov, VP
    Sumaneev, OV
    IRPA9 - 1996 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON RADIATION PROTECTION / NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, PROCEEDINGS, VOL 4, 1996, : D567 - D567
  • [45] COMPARISON OF ABSORBED DOSE TO RPL GLASS DOSIMETER CALCULATED BY EGS CODE AND KERMA
    YAMAGUCHI, C
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH, 1982, 197 (2-3): : 473 - 476
  • [46] TECHNIQUES FOR EVALUATING CONVERSION COEFFICIENTS TO THE NEW DOSE EQUIVALENT QUANTITIES AT A CALIBRATION LABORATORY
    TILIKIDIS, A
    GRINDBORG, JE
    LINDBORG, L
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1989, 28 (1-2) : 53 - 57
  • [48] On absorbed dose coefficients calculated by Veinot and Hertel
    Schwahn, Scott O.
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 2007, 92 (06): : 668 - 668
  • [49] Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study
    Palmans, H
    Nafaa, L
    De Jans, J
    Gillis, S
    Hoornaert, MT
    Martens, C
    Piessens, M
    Thierens, H
    Van der Plaetsen, A
    Vynckier, S
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (03): : 421 - 440
  • [50] Kerma factors for calculating the absorbed dose of 15-150 MeV neutrons
    Gorbatkov, DV
    Kryuchkov, VP
    Sumaneev, OV
    ATOMIC ENERGY, 1996, 80 (04) : 271 - 276