Comparison of different configurations of Phase Doppler Analyser

被引:0
|
作者
Zaremba, Matous [1 ]
Maly, Milan [1 ]
Jedelsky, Jan [1 ]
Jicha, Miroslav [1 ]
机构
[1] Brno Univ Technol, Fac Mech Engn, Dept Thermodynam & Environm Engn, Tech 2896 2, Brno 61669, Czech Republic
关键词
SPRAYS;
D O I
10.1051/epjconf/201611402142
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
A phase Doppler anemometry (PDA) technique is widely used in experimental fluid mechanics to measure size and velocity of particles in the fluid flow. Even though this method is common in experimental fluid mechanics, there are only few techniques that might serve for the purpose of the evaluation of the PDA system. To examine results of the PDA visualizations techniques are usually used. However, this approach suffers from several aspects. Mainly, it is difficult to determine the exact position of the measurement volume of PDA system. Then it is complicated to determine which particles are passing through the measuring volume. Another way how to examine performance of the PDA system is to use two PDA systems simultaneously. By using one laser for both systems we can avoid previously mentioned aspects. In our experiments, we use fiber based PDA system and classical PDA system both made by Dantec Dynamics. The aim of this paper is to compare results from various configurations and highlight crucial parameters that influence measurements.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quantitative comparison of stability of ANAMMOX process in different reactor configurations
    Jin, Ren-Cun
    Hu, Bao-Lan
    Zheng, Ping
    Qaisar, Mahmood
    Hu, An-Hui
    Islam, Ejazul
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 99 (06) : 1603 - 1609
  • [42] Comparison of four different FIM configurations-a simulation study
    Pettersen, F. J.
    Ferdous, H.
    Kalvoy, H.
    Martinsen, O. G.
    Hogetveit, J. O.
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2014, 35 (06) : 1067 - 1082
  • [43] Comparison of ice growth on composite insulators with different shed configurations
    Hu Q.
    Wang S.
    Yang H.
    Shu L.
    Jiang X.
    Ren X.
    Yu H.
    1600, Power System Technology Press (40): : 2236 - 2243
  • [44] Experimental analysis with numerical comparison for different thermoelectric generators configurations
    Favarel, Camille
    Bedecarrats, Jean-Pierre
    Kousksou, Tank
    Champier, Daniel
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 107 : 114 - 122
  • [45] Analysis and comparison of two different configurations of external dissipative systems
    Gioiella, Laura
    Tubaldi, Enrico
    Gara, Fabrizio
    Dezi, Lugino
    Dall'Asta, Andrea
    X INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS (EURODYN 2017), 2017, 199 : 164 - 169
  • [46] Design and comparison of different Magneto-Rheological valves configurations
    Daniel, Grivon
    Yoan, Civet
    Zoltan, Pataky
    Yves, Perriard
    2015 IEEE/ASME INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INTELLIGENT MECHATRONICS (AIM), 2015, : 818 - 823
  • [47] Comparison of District Heating Supply Options for Different CHP Configurations
    Ruseljuk, Pavel
    Dedov, Andrei
    Hlebnikov, Aleksandr
    Lepiksaar, Kertu
    Volkova, Anna
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (02)
  • [48] Comparison of Flight Characteristics of Two Different Airplanes and Ice Configurations
    Deiler, Christoph
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2020, 57 (05): : 995 - 1000
  • [49] Optimization of the electrodeionization process: comparison of different resin bed configurations
    Lakehal, Aicha
    Bouhidel, Kamel-Eddine
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2017, 86 : 96 - 101
  • [50] Theoretical comparison between different configurations of radial and conventional bogies
    Garcia, JF
    Olaizola, X
    Martin, LM
    Gimenez, JG
    VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2000, 33 (04) : 233 - 259