Risk-adjusted cesarean rates - What risk factors for cesarean delivery are important to practicing obstetricians?

被引:0
|
作者
Bailit, Jennifer L.
Schulkin, Jay
Dawson, Neal V.
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Metrohlth Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44109 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Med, Metrohlth Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44109 USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Metrohlth Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44109 USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Ctr Hlth Care Res & Policy, Metrohlth Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44109 USA
[5] Amer Coll Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Dept Res, Washington, DC 20024 USA
关键词
cesarean section; quality of health care; risk adjustment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To determine which primary cesarean delivery risk factors are important to practicing physicians. STUDY DESIGN: A sample of current members of the American College of Obstetrician Gynecologists were surveyed about the risk factors for primary cesarean delivery that they thought were most important. Data on demographic and practice characteristics were also collected. Sample size was determined by theoretical saturation. RESULTS: Theoretical saturation was reach at 60 responses. A total of 290 surveys were returned. The 10 most common factors listed by physicians as preexisting patient risk factors for primary cesarean delivery were, in descending order of importance, medical problems, maternal obesity, macrosomic infant, malpresentation, multiple gestation, maternal age, Bishop score, patient's fear, preterm labor, and postdate pregnancy. Six of the 10 factors listed by respondents are in previously published risk-adjustment models. CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that the addition of obesity and birth weight to previously published risk adjustment models should improve representation of practicing obstetricians' views.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 198
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk factors for postoperative ileus after cesarean delivery
    Hennebery, Ruth B.
    Burke, Christine A.
    Bank, Tracy Caroline
    Hoffman, Matthew K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2022, 4 (06)
  • [22] Risk Factors for Postoperative Infection After Cesarean Delivery
    Moulton, Laura J.
    Lachiewicz, Mark
    Buechel, Megan E.
    Jaiyeoba, Oluwatosin
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 125 : 96S - 97S
  • [23] Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery
    Pelosi, MA
    Pelosi, MA
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 105 (04): : 900 - 900
  • [24] Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage following cesarean delivery
    Ashwal, Eran
    Bergel Bson, Riki
    Aviram, Amir
    Hadar, Eran
    Yogev, Yariv
    Hiersch, Liran
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (18): : 3626 - 3630
  • [25] Anthropometric factors and risk of primary cesarean delivery.
    Shepard, MJ
    Saftlas, AF
    LeoSummers, L
    Bracken, MB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 143 (11) : 105 - 105
  • [26] Risk-adjusted Social Discount Rates
    Cherbonnier, Frederic
    Gollier, Christian
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 2022, 43 (04): : 45 - 68
  • [27] Cesarean birth after vaginal: risk factors for primary cesarean delivery in multiparous women
    Kaimal, Anjali
    Newman, Katharine
    Croft, Damien
    Ecker, Jeffrey
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S295 - S295
  • [28] Outcome and risk factors of cesarean delivery with and without cesarean myomectomy in women with uterine myomatas
    Dedes, I.
    Schaffer, L.
    Zimmermann, R.
    Burkhardt, T.
    Haslinger, C.
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 295 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [29] DETERMINATION OF RISK-ADJUSTED DISCOUNT RATES
    PLANE, DR
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 1967, 2 (04) : 421 - 422
  • [30] Outcome and risk factors of cesarean delivery with and without cesarean myomectomy in women with uterine myomatas
    I. Dedes
    L. Schäffer
    R. Zimmermann
    T. Burkhardt
    C. Haslinger
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2017, 295 : 27 - 32