MULTI-OBJECTIVE PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION OF THE K-TYPE SHELL AND TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER (CASE STUDY)

被引:2
|
作者
Nadi, M. [1 ]
Ehyaei, M. A. [1 ]
Ahmadi, A. [2 ]
Turgut, O. E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Pardis Branch, Pardis New City, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Sch New Technol, Tehran, Iran
[3] Bakircay Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Menemen Izmir, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF THERMAL ENGINEERING | 2021年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
Cryogenic; Heat exchanger; Optimization; Objective; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC OPTIMIZATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; ENVIRONMENTAL-ANALYSIS; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN APPROACH; THERMAL DESIGN; EXERGY; COST; ENTROPY;
D O I
10.18186/thermal.888261
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper investigated optimization of two objectives function include the total amount of heat transfer between two mediums and the total cost of shell and tube heat exchanger. The study was carried out for k-type heat exchanger of the cryogenic unit of gas condensates by multiple objective particle swarm optimization. Six decision variables including pipe pitch ratio, pipe diameter, pipe number, pipe length, baffle cut ratio, and baffle distance ratio were taking into account to conduct this simulation-based research. The results of mathematical modeling confirmed the actual results (data collected from the evaporator unit of the Tehran refinery's absorption chiller). The optimization results revealed that the two objective functions of heat transfer rate and the total cost were in contradiction with each other. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that with change in the pitch ratio from 1.25 to 2, the amount of heat transfer was reduced from 420 to 390 kW about 7.8%. Moreover, these variations caused reduction in cost function from 24,500 to 23,500 $, less than 1%. On the other hand, an increase in pipe length from 3 to 12 meters, the heat transfer rate raised from 365 to 415 kW by 13.7%, while the cost increased from 20,000$ to 24500$ about 22%.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 583
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A particle swarm optimization for multi-objective flowshop scheduling
    D. Y. Sha
    Hsing Hung Lin
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2009, 45 (7-8) : 749 - 758
  • [42] Improved multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm
    College of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710129, China
    不详
    Liu, B. (lbn1987113@163.com), 2013, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (BUAA) (39):
  • [43] An improved multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm
    Zhang, Qiuming
    Xue, Siqing
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTATION AND INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4683 : 372 - +
  • [44] Molecular docking with multi-objective particle swarm optimization
    Janson, Stefan
    Merkle, Daniel
    Middendorf, Martin
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2008, 8 (01) : 666 - 675
  • [45] Intelligent particle swarm optimization in multi-objective problems
    Ho, Shinn-Jang
    Ku, Wen-Yuan
    Jou, Jun-Wun
    Hung, Ming-Hao
    Ho, Shinn-Ying
    ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 3918 : 790 - 800
  • [46] Constrained Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm
    Gao, Yue-lin
    Qu, Min
    EMERGING INTELLIGENT COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS, 2012, 304 : 47 - 55
  • [47] A particle swarm optimization for multi-objective flowshop scheduling
    Sha, D. Y.
    Lin, Hsing-Hung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 45 (7-8): : 749 - 758
  • [48] Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization in Intrusion Detection
    Cleetus, Nimmy
    Dhanya, K. A.
    COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN DATA MINING, VOL 2, 2015, 32 : 175 - 185
  • [49] MOVPSO: Vortex Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization
    Meza, Joaquin
    Espitia, Helbert
    Montenegro, Carlos
    Gimenez, Elena
    Gonzalez-Crespo, Ruben
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 52 : 1042 - 1057
  • [50] Correlative Particle Swarm Optimization for Multi-objective Problems
    Shen, Yuanxia
    Wang, Guoyin
    Liu, Qun
    ADVANCES IN SWARM INTELLIGENCE, PT II, 2011, 6729 : 17 - 25