FEC in optical communications - A tutorial overview on the evolution of architectures and the future prospects of outband and inband FEC for optical communications

被引:42
|
作者
Tychopoulos, Afxendios [1 ]
Koufopavlou, Odysseas
Tomkos, Ioannis
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, GR-26110 Patras, Greece
[2] Athens Informat Technol, Athens, Greece
来源
IEEE CIRCUITS & DEVICES | 2006年 / 22卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1109/MCD.2006.307281
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
There are three representative architectures of 1/2/3-g outband and inband forward error correction (FEC) schemes. The first generation outband FEC is Reed-Solomon (RS) codes which are Maximum Distance Separable (MDS) and suitable for burst-form errors, because of their nonbinary structure. An extensive experience on the corrective properties of RS codes (compact disks, wireless/satellite links, deep space missions) made them a natural first choice for the enhancement of optical links. A widely used approach is RS coding is the code-symbol interleaving of a number of individual RS-codes. The reason for interleaving is the distribution of channel errors to all partial codes in the FEC scheme so that no single one of them is overwhelmed by these errors. The second generation came from the maturity of DWDM systems, diverse FEC-concentration schemes made their appearance in the market. The clear performance-advantage over classic FEC and the common element of serial FEC concatenation put these schemes under the umbrella of second generation FEC systems for optical communications. It was soon realized that second generation FEC schemes don't achieve the required system margin for some important ULH links. Third-generation FEC mostly rely on Turbo and low-density parity-check (LDPC) coding concepts, they also leverage iterative decoding to obtain realizable receivers and achieve very high coding-gains.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 86
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Overview of Vehicle Optical Wireless Communications
    Mei, Hongye
    Ding, Jupeng
    Zheng, Jiong
    Chen, Xifeng
    Liu, Wenwen
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 173461 - 173480
  • [22] Underwater Optical Wireless Communications: Overview
    Spagnolo, Giuseppe Schirripa
    Cozzella, Lorenzo
    Leccese, Fabio
    SENSORS, 2020, 20 (08)
  • [23] Underwater Optical Wireless Communications in Swarm Robotics: A Tutorial
    Hoeher, Peter Adam
    Sticklus, Jan
    Harlakin, Andrej
    IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2021, 23 (04): : 2630 - 2659
  • [24] Quantum physics and optical communications. A tutorial paper
    Hinton, K.
    ATR. Australian telecommunication research, 1990, 24 (01): : 27 - 42
  • [25] Optimization of the "FOCUS" Inband-FEC architecture for 10-gbps SDH/SONET optical communication channels
    Tychopoulos, Afxendios
    Koufopavlou, Odysseas
    2007 DESIGN, AUTOMATION & TEST IN EUROPE CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION, VOLS 1-3, 2007, : 1575 - 1580
  • [26] Progress in optical amplifiers and the future of optical communications systems
    Nakagawa, K
    OPTICAL AMPLIFIERS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS, 1999, 30 : 2 - 9
  • [27] TWO-PARALLEL CONCATENATED BCH SUPER-FEC ARCHITECTURE FOR 100-GB/S OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS
    Yoon, Sangho
    Lee, Hanho
    Lee, Kihoon
    Choi, Chang-Seok
    Shin, Jongyoon
    Kim, Jongho
    Ko, Je-Soo
    SIPS: 2009 IEEE WORKSHOP ON SIGNAL PROCESSING SYSTEMS, 2009, : 36 - +
  • [28] An Envisioned Future for Space Optical Communications
    Edwards, Bernard L.
    Antsos, Dimitrios
    Biswas, Abhijit
    Braatz, Lena
    Robinson, Bryan
    2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SPACE OPTICAL SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, ICSOS, 2023, : 1 - 7
  • [29] OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE FUTURE - STAFF REPORT
    不详
    PHOTONICS SPECTRA, 1982, 16 (06) : 55 - 59
  • [30] OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS - PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE
    GREEN, RJ
    ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1989, 1 (03): : 105 - 114