Self-reported sick leave following a brief preventive intervention on work-related stress: a randomised controlled trial in primary health care

被引:6
|
作者
Hulten, Anna-Maria [1 ]
Bjerkeli, Pernilla [2 ]
Holmgren, Kristina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Neurosci & Physiol, Dept Hlth & Rehabil, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Skovde, Dept Publ Hlth Res, Skovde, Sweden
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 03期
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
medical education & training; occupational & industrial medicine; primary care; public health;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041157
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of a brief intervention about early identification of work-related stress combined with feedback at consultation with a general practitioner (GP) on the number of self-reported sick leave days. Design Randomised controlled trial. Prospective analyses of self-reported sick leave data collected between November 2015 and January 2017. Setting Seven primary healthcare centres in western Sweden. Participants The study included 271 employed, non-sick-listed patients aged 18-64 years seeking care for mental and/or physical health complaints. Of these, 132 patients were allocated to intervention and 139 patients to control. Interventions The intervention group received a brief intervention about work-related stress, including training for GPs, screening of patients' work-related stress, feedback to patients on screening results and discussion of measures at GP consultation. The control group received treatment as usual. Outcome measures The number of self-reported gross sick leave days and the number of self-reported net sick leave days, thereby also considering part-time sick leave. Results At 6 months' follow-up, 220/271 (81%) participants were assessed, while at 12 months' follow-up, 241/271 (89%) participants were assessed. At 6-month follow-up, 59/105 (56%) in the intervention group and 61/115 (53%) in the control group reported no sick leave. At 12-month follow-up, the corresponding numbers were 61/119 (51%) and 57/122 (47%), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention group and the control group in the median number of self-reported gross sick leave days and the median number of self-reported net sick leave days. Conclusions The brief intervention showed no effect on the numbers of self-reported sick leave days for patients seeking care at the primary healthcare centres. Other actions and new types of interventions need to be explored to address patients' perceiving of ill health due to work-related stress.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A cluster randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of a brief walking intervention delivered in primary care: Study protocol
    French, David P.
    Williams, Stefanie L.
    Michie, Susan
    Taylor, Claire
    Szczepura, Ala
    Stallard, Nigel
    Dale, Jeremy
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2011, 12
  • [42] A Technology-Assisted Telephone Intervention for Work-Related Stress Management: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Muuraiskangas, Salla Tuulikki
    Honka, Anita Marianne
    Junno, Ulla-Maija
    Nieminen, Hannu Olavi
    Kaartinen, Jouni Kalevi
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (07)
  • [43] Early multidisciplinary assessment was associated with longer periods of sick leave: A randomized controlled trial in a primary health care centre
    Carlsson, Lars
    Englund, Lars
    Hallqvist, Johan
    Wallman, Thorne
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2013, 31 (03) : 141 - 146
  • [44] Lifetime Prevalence of Self-Reported Work-Related Health Problems Among US Workers - United States, 2018
    Free, Hannah
    Groenewold, Matthew R.
    Luckhaupt, Sara E.
    MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, 2020, 69 (13): : 361 - 365
  • [45] Cognitive-behavioural therapy and return-to-work intervention for patients on sick leave due to common mental disorders: a randomised controlled trial
    Salomonsson, Sigrid
    Santoft, Fredrik
    Lindaster, Elin
    Ejeby, Kersti
    Ljtosson, Brjann
    Ost, Lars-Goran
    Ingvar, Martin
    Lekander, Mats
    Hedman-Lagerlof, Erik
    OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 74 (12) : 905 - 912
  • [46] Employment status five years after a randomised controlled trial comparing multidisciplinary and brief intervention in employees on sick leave due to low back pain
    Pedersen, Pernille
    Nielsen, Claus Vinther
    Jensen, Ole Kudsk
    Jensen, Chris
    Labriola, Merete
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 46 (03) : 383 - 388
  • [47] Efficacy of an Omaha system-based remote ergonomic intervention program on self-reported work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) - A randomized controlled study
    Zhang, Tianqiao
    Tian, Ye
    Yin, Yanliang
    Sun, Weige
    Tang, Limei
    Tang, Ruoliang
    Tian, Yichao
    Gong, Shuhui
    Tian, Suzhai
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (02)
  • [48] Does early identification of work-related stress in primary health care effect pharmacy dispensing?
    Bjerkeli, P.
    Skoglund, I. M.
    Holmgren, K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30 : V326 - V326
  • [49] Feasibility randomised controlled trial of a guided workbook intervention to support work-related goals among cancer survivors in the UK
    Grunfeld, Elizabeth A.
    Schumacher, Lauren
    Armaou, Maria
    Woods, Pernille L.
    Rolf, Pauline
    Sutton, Andrew John
    Zarkar, Anjali
    Sadhra, Steven S.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (01):
  • [50] A brief guided self-help intervention for psychological distress in palliative care patients: A randomised controlled trial
    Galfin, John M.
    Watkins, Ed R.
    Harlow, Tim
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 26 (03) : 197 - 205