Testing for nonlinear genotype x environment interactions

被引:1
|
作者
Yang, Rong-Cai [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Alberta Agr & Forestry, Crop Genet Sect, Edmonton, AB T6H 5T6, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Agr Food & Nutr Sci, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
MODEL; ADAPTATION; PLASTICITY;
D O I
10.1002/csc2.20268
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The responses of different genotypes to an environmental gradient are often nonlinear and nonparallel. Current tests for differential genotypic responses are based largely on linear regression models (stability analysis) or on evaluations of all quadruples for crossover interactions (COIs) from a two-way genotype x environment (G x E) table if the environments are unquantified. The objective of this study was to develop a new statistical analysis for comparing nonlinear genotypic response curves over an environmental gradient. We first conducted an investigation to find the points where the two nonparallel curves intersected. If the intersection points lie within the attainable environmental range, the two nonparallel curves involve COI; if the points lie at the boundaries or outside the attainable range, the nonparallel curves do not involve COI. We then developed statistical tests for comparing a full and a reduced model describing the two nonparallel curves. The tests were used to analyze a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germination test (WGT) data under the reciprocal of a linear function and a barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivar trial (BCT) data under Cauchy function. The WGT analysis shows that at least one pair of cultivars involve COI over the temperature gradient, which went undetected by a previous test based on all possible quadruples. The BCT analysis revealed that 56% of 780 possible pairs of 40 genotypes differ significantly from each other, providing more insights into the patterns of complex G x E interactions. Our analysis is therefore a viable alternative to the existing procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:3127 / 3140
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MEASUREMENT AND SIGNIFICANCE OF GENOTYPE X ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS IN PERENNIAL GRASSES
    BREESE, EL
    HEREDITY, 1967, 22 : 616 - &
  • [32] Genotype x environment interactions in gene regulation and complex traits
    Boye, Carly
    Nirmalan, Shreya
    Ranjbaran, Ali
    Luca, Francesca
    NATURE GENETICS, 2024, 56 (06) : 1057 - 1068
  • [33] GENOTYPE X ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS IN BURLEY TOBACCO VARIETY TESTS
    GUPTON, CL
    LEGG, PD
    LINK, LA
    ROSS, HF
    CROP SCIENCE, 1974, 14 (06) : 811 - 814
  • [34] YIELD STABILITY AND GENOTYPE X ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS IN SWEET POTATOES
    COLLINS, WW
    WILSON, LG
    ARRENDELL, S
    HORTSCIENCE, 1979, 14 (02) : 123 - 123
  • [35] Genotype x Environment Interactions for Potato Tuber Carotenoid Content
    Haynes, Kathleen G.
    Clevidence, Beverly A.
    Rao, David
    Vinyard, Bryan T.
    White, J. Marion
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2010, 135 (03) : 250 - 258
  • [36] Heritability and genotype X environment interactions for discolored rice kernels
    Gravois, KA
    Bernhardt, JL
    CROP SCIENCE, 2000, 40 (02) : 314 - 318
  • [37] Path analysis of genotype x environment interactions of wheats to nitrogen
    Ehdaie, B
    Shakiba, MR
    Waines, JG
    AGRONOMIE, 1999, 19 (01): : 45 - 56
  • [38] Genotype X environment interactions and heritability of tocopherol contents in canola
    Marwede, V
    Schierholt, A
    Möllers, C
    Becker, HC
    CROP SCIENCE, 2004, 44 (03) : 728 - 731
  • [39] Effect of genotype x environment x management interactions on chickpea phenotypic stability
    Kaloki, Peter
    Trethowan, Richard
    Tan, Daniel K. Y.
    CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE, 2019, 70 (05): : 453 - 462
  • [40] Testing Systematic Genotype by Environment Interactions Using Item Level Data
    Dylan Molenaar
    Conor V. Dolan
    Behavior Genetics, 2014, 44 : 212 - 231